Skip to content

· Private foundation

Burnett Unity Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$571k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$493kRecreation & Sports$101kEducation$67kAnimals$36kYouth Development$35kHealth$25kFood & Nutrition$15kHuman Services$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $88k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $400k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$790k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE RIVER COMMUNITY CHURCH$400,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
RISING ABOVE MINISTRIES$25,000
TENNESSEE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$20,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$13,000
COOKEVILLE RESCUE MISSION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
PIONEER CHURCH$10,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$5,000
COOKEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
STEVENS STREET CARE MINISTRY$5,000
LIGHTHOUSE CHRISTIAN CAMP$3,600
Individual grant recipient$3,500
HEART OF THE CUMBERLANDS$2,500
MOODY RADIO$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UPPER CUMBERLAND CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $2k → 19%UPPER CUMBERLAND CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $1k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$688k · 14 repeat orgs$99k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
7

Total granted

$688k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+2%

Still filing today

36%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $69k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentReligionEducationHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    Tennessee Technological University Foundation
    5× · 2021–2025 · $66k · revenue +63%
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $46k · revenue +87%
  • LC
    LIGHTHOUSE CHRISTIAN CAMP
    6× · 2020–2025 · $35k · revenue +85%

Funded once

  • AM
    ALPHA MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
  • FC
    FORWARD CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
  • UC
    UPPER CUMBERLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cumberland County Habitat for Humanity

To provide new housing for economically disadvantaged families.

—
2
Freedom Place of the Upper Cumberland Inc

To assist individuals with life-controlling problems

Human Services
3
Christ Together Inc

Christ Together is a network of churches, from various denominations or independent, collaborating to reach their cities with the Gospel in both word and deed through both proclamation and acts of service.

Religion
4
Tennessee Christian Preparatory School

Educate children in a christ like manner

Education
5
Ottumwa Christian School White

Christian education

Education
6
Hickory Hollow Christian School

School

—
7
C2C Ministries

Evangelism, Church Planting, Christian Growth and discipleship.

Religion
8
Hope Counseling Services of Chapel Hill

We provide accessible biblical counseling and training, walking alongside hurting people, which leads to Christ-centered hope, help, and healing, for the Triangle and beyond.

Health
9
Associated Christian Broadcasters

Christian Radio Station

Arts & Culture
10
United Counseling

To create and nurture within the context of the christian community ways of healing, reconciling, and guidance for clergy and laity, for problems in their lives.

—
11
Cross to Light Corporation

Cross to Light is a nondenominational Christian organization providing spiritual education and physical aid to people in need around the world. Since 2005, Cross to Light has helped people cross from darkness to light by hearing the Gospel…

Religion
12
Joshua and Caleb Ministries Inc

Church ministry

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lighthouse Christian Camp; the most unlike its peers is The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE RIVER COMMUNITY CHURCH: $410,000 · OtherTHE RIVER COMMUNITY CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOOKEVILLE RESCUE MISSION INC: $35,500 · OtherCOOKEVILLE RESCUE MISSION INCIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · Other+19 more: $83,750 · Other+19 moreFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $46,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP …LIGHTHOUSE CHRISTIAN CAMP: $35,400 · Youth DevelopmentLIGHTHOUSE …Tennessee Technological University Foundation: $66,000 · EducationTennessee…+1 more: $2,000 · EducationRISING ABOVE MINISTRIES: $35,000 · ReligionUPPER CUMBERLAND CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $2,500 · Human ServicesHeart of the Cumberland Inc: $2,500 · Health
Other$599,250Youth Development$81,400Education$68,000Religion$35,000Human Services$2,500Health$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTennessee Technological University Foundation: $66,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $46,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE CHRISTIAN CAMP: $35,400 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetRISING ABOVE MINISTRIES: $35,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetUPPER CUMBERLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUPPER CUMBERLAND CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $2,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHeart of the Cumberland Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Tennessee Technological University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE CHRISTIAN CAMP ↗
  • Who funds RISING ABOVE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds UPPER CUMBERLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds UPPER CUMBERLAND CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Heart of the Cumberland Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI11.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Burnett Unity Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Burnett Unity Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Burnett Unity Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Burnett Unity Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Burnett Unity’s filings →

    More from the funding graph