Skip to content
Burke Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Burke Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$484k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$11MHealth$1.4MEnvironment$475kArts & Culture$416kScience & Tech$200kHuman Services$184kPhilanthropy$163kAnimals$65kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $111k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$354k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLGATE UNIVERSITY$250,000
BARRETT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$50,000
VIA ART FUND$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA WESTERN$25,000
THE GOTHAM FILM AND MEDIA INSTITUTE$16,250
EPISCOPAL ACADEMY$10,000
THE RELEASE RECOVERY FOUNDATION$10,000
GREENLIGHT FUND$10,000
HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL$10,000
AMERICAN FUND FOR THE SOUTHBANK CENTRE$10,000
HEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA$10,000
EVERY MOTHER COUNTS$10,000
THE HAMPTON LIBRARY$5,000
LOS ANGELES COUNTY MUSEUM OF ART$5,000
HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $1.0M → 7%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $100k → 8%MONTANA LAND RELIANCE: $50k → 9%THE STATION FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA WESTERN: $84k → 12%EPISCOPAL ACADEMY: $50k → 10%STEPPINGSTONE SCHOLARS: $267k → 22%COLGATE UNIVERSITY: $7.0M → 11%VIA ART FUND: $50k → 17%BOTTOM LINE: $32k → 20%BONEFISH AND TARPON TRUST: $10k → 15%WESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE: $10k → 7%NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $25k → 6%MAINE MEDICAL CENTER: $50k → 7%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $25k → 7%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $100k → 8%GREENLIGHT FUND: $10k → 16%THE STATION FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA WESTERN: $84k → 12%EPISCOPAL ACADEMY: $15k → 10%STEPPINGSTONE SCHOLARS: $51k → 22%THE RELEASE RECOVERY FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%COLGATE UNIVERSITY: $3.0M → 11%BOB WOODRUFF FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%BOTTOM LINE: $32k → 20%NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $25k → 6%MAINE MEDICAL CENTER: $50k → 7%HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $10k → 8%THE STATION FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA WESTERN: $82k → 12%HORIZONS THE EPISCOPAL ACADEMY: $15k → 10%COLGATE UNIVERSITY: $250k → 11%CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY: $15k → 17%IFP: $25k → 20%BARRETT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $50k → 12%EPISCOPAL ACADEMY: $10k → 10%GREENLIGHT FUND PHILADELPHIA: $125k → 22%COLGATE UNIVERSITY: $63k → 11%THE GOTHAM FILM AND MEDIA INSTITUTE: $16k → 20%BARRETT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $50k → 12%EPISCOPAL ACADEMY: $10k → 10%COLGATE UNIVERSITY: $51k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA WESTERN: $25k → 12%COLGATE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 11%COLGATE UNIVERSITY: $38k → 11%STEPPINGSTONE SCHOLARS: $197k → 22%COLGATE UNIVERSITY: $13k → 11%STEPPINGSTONE SCHOLARS: $50k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MT
NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
VA
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 21 repeat orgs$606k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
16

Total granted

$14M
$480k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+24%

Still filing today

90%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $126k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureEnvironmentEducationAnimalsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CU
    COLGATE UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $10M · revenue +60%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $1.1M · revenue +62%
  • SS
    STEPPINGSTONE SCHOLARS INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $565k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • YF
    YELLOWSTONE FOREVERgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue +287%
  • GF
    GREENLIGHT FUND PHILADELPHIA
    one grant, 2020 · $125k
  • I
    IFP
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
5
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
6
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
7
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
8
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
11
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
12
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Loss and Bereavement; the most unlike its peers is Tinworks Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
26/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLGATE UNIVERSITY: $10,471,074 · EducationCOLGATE UNIVERSITY+4 more: $296,086 · EducationDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,074,818 · HealthDana-Farber…THE STATION FOUNDATION: $125,000 · HealthTHE STATION…Barrett Hospital Foundation Inc: $100,000 · HealthBarrett Hos…MaineHealth: $100,000 · HealthMaineHealth+5 more: $36,000 · HealthSTEPPINGSTONE SCHOLARS INC: $564,705 · OtherSTEPPINGS…UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA WESTERN: $275,000 · OtherUNIVERSIT…GREENLIGHT FUND PHILADELPHIA: $125,020 · OtherGREENLIGH…MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $55,000 · Other+17 more: $138,000 · Other+17 moreYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $249,842 · EnvironmentTHE MONTANA LAND RELIANCE: $200,000 · Environment+3 more: $25,000 · EnvironmentPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $209,734 · Arts & CultureTINWORKS ART: $100,000 · Arts & CultureVIA ART FUND INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureINDEPENDENT FEATURE PROJECT INC: $26,250 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $20,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BOTTOM LINE INC: $64,000 · Community ImprovementGREENLIGHT FUND INC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $49,717 · AnimalsBONEFISH & TARPON TRUST INC: $10,000 · AnimalsZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA: $5,000 · Animals
Education$10,767,160Health$1,435,818Other$1,157,725Environment$474,842Arts & Culture$405,984Community Improvement$74,000Animals$64,717

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLGATE UNIVERSITY: $10,471,074 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,074,818 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPPINGSTONE SCHOLARS INC: $564,705 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $249,842 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $209,734 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $200,086 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MONTANA LAND RELIANCE: $200,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE STATION FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetTINWORKS ART: $100,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetBarrett Hospital Foundation Inc: $100,000 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetMaineHealth: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEpiscopal Academy: $85,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOTTOM LINE INC: $64,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetVIA ART FUND INC: $50,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $49,717 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINDEPENDENT FEATURE PROJECT INC: $26,250 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBAKER INDUSTRIES INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $18,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEVERY MOTHER COUNTS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOB WOODRUFF FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBONEFISH & TARPON TRUST INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGREENLIGHT FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM ASSOCIATES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RELEASE RECOVERY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FUND FOR THE SOUTHBANK CENTRE INC C/O MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP: $10,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetHEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSESAME WORKSHOP: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR LOSS AND BEREAVEMENT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYELLOWSTONE CLUB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAVEN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSelf-Help Enterprises: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ONE LOVE FOUNDATION IN HONOR OF YEARDLEY LOVE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCureCervicalCancer: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPETER'S PLACE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL WALDENSTROM'S MACROGLOBULINEMIA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHURU INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Cha…Silicon Valley Commun…United Way of Greater…National Philanthropi…Boston Foundation IncVanguard Charitable E…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Morgan Stanley Global…Enterprise Holdings F…Charities Aid Foundat…American Endowment Fo…The Bank of America C…
The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY14.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · National Philanthropic Trust · Boston Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Burke Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Burke Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • The Bottom Line Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Burke Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home