Skip to content

· Private foundation

Burdette E Snyder Foundation Xxxxx8008

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2018
10
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$5k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

50% of Burdette E Snyder Foundation Xxxxx8008’s FY2020 grant dollars went to American Endowment Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year Burdette E Snyder Foundation Xxxxx8008 named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $23k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
’17
7
’18
0
’19
0
’20

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Philanthropy$101kHealth$25kArts & Culture$18kCommunity Improvement$7kEducation$4kHuman Services$2kEnvironment$2kCrime & Legal$500Other$0
02FY2018 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OUTRIGGERS DUKE KAHANAMOKU FOUNDATION$5,000
ROTARY CLUB OF HONOLULU$4,000
DIAMOND HEAD THEATHRE$3,000
HONOLULU MUSEUM OF ART$2,500
HAWAII HISTORIC FOUNDATION$2,000
HAWAIIAN ISLANDS LAND TRUST$2,000
MANOA VALLEY THEATHRE$2,000
KUMU KAHUA THEATHRE$1,000
PUNAHOU SCHOOL$500
CRIME STOPPERS-HONOLULU$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%PALOLO CHINESE HOME: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$91k · 4 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2018, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call). Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

$91k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+47%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF HONOLULU
    2× · 2017–2018 · $7k · revenue +240%
  • HM
    HONOLULU MUSEUM OF ART
    2× · 2017–2018 · $5k · revenue +0%
  • PS
    PUNAHOU SCHOOL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • GC
    GONINO CENTER FOR HEALING
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • DA
    DAMIEN ALUMNI ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • PC
    PALOLO CHINESE HOMEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
E Kupaku Ka Aina - the Hawaii Land Restoration Institute
Environment
2
Hawaii Maritime Center
—
3
Hawaiian Historical Society

The society is dedicated to preserving historical materials relating to hawaii, and to publishing scholarly research on hawaiian history so present and future peoples throughout the world will recognize and appreciate the history. the…

Arts & Culture
4
Uhiwai O Haleakala

The mission of the corporation shall be to work with partners to protect and restore native ecosystems and watersheds, to improve the quality and quantity of freshwater resources to perpetuate hawaiian cultural resources and practices, to…

Environment
5
Hawaii Book and Music Festival
Arts & Culture
6
Hui Aloha Kiholo

Our mission is to protect, perpetuate, and enhance the cultural and natural landscape of the kiholo bay area through collaborative management and active community stewardship.

Arts & Culture
7
Japanese Cultural Center of Hawaii

To be a vibrant resource, strengthening our diverse community by educating present and future generations in the evolving japanese american experience in hawaii. we do this through relevant programming, meaningful community service and…

Arts & Culture
8
Hawaii International Film Festival

To foster international cultural awareness and understanding through the medium of film. to act as a creative pipeline for hawaii and the pacific, showcasing new and emerging talent from hawaii, asia, americas, europe, and the pacific…

Arts & Culture
9
Kula Aupuni Niihau a Kahelelani Aloha (Kanaka)

Preserve niihau cultural values and language.

Education
10
Mohala Pua School Dba Honolulu Waldorf School

See schedule o.at honolulu waldorf school, we educate each child to find meaning, passion, and purpose in life and to contribute to the creation of a better world for all. through a curriculum based on the developmental stages of the human…

Education
11
The University of Hawaii Alumni Association

To advance the interests of the university of hawaii, alumni, and friends through mutually beneficial and lifelong relationships, to generate support for the university, and to participate in events that showcase the university's…

—
12
Aloha Performing Arts Company

The mission of the aloha theatre is to enrich the lives of hawaii residents and visitors by providing quality live theatre, performing arts education, and a venue for artistic expression.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Diamond Head Theatre; the most unlike its peers is Honolulu Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $77,860 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGONINO CENTER FOR HEALING: $25,000 · OtherGONINO CENTER FOR HEALINGROTARY CLUB OF HONOLULU: $7,000 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF HONOLULUOUTRIGGERS DUKE KAHANAMOKU FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Other+6 more: $11,000 · Other+6 moreAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $101,337 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATIONHONOLULU MUSEUM OF ART: $5,000 · Arts & CultureHAWAIIAN ISLANDS LAND TRUST: $2,000 · EnvironmentPUNAHOU SCHOOL: $1,500 · EducationPALOLO CHINESE HOME: $1,000 · Human ServicesKUMU KAHUA THEATRE INC: $1,000 · Community Improvement
Other$125,860Philanthropy$101,337Arts & Culture$5,000Environment$2,000Education$1,500Human Services$1,000Community Improvement$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $101,337 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHONOLULU MUSEUM OF ART: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDIAMOND HEAD THEATRE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAIIAN ISLANDS LAND TRUST: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPUNAHOU SCHOOL: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPALOLO CHINESE HOME: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKUMU KAHUA THEATRE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNAVY LEAGUE OF THE UNITED STATES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCrime Stoppers Honolulu Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tradewind Group FoundationHI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tradewind Group Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Burdette E Snyder Foundation Xxxxx8008 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Burdette E Snyder Foundation Xxxxx8008. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Burdette E Snyder Foundation Xxxxx8008’s filings →

    More from the funding graph