Skip to content
Burbank Health Care Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Burbank Health Care Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4.4M
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$3.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Health$3.1MPhilanthropy$1.4MHousing & Shelter$210kHuman Services$150kCommunity Improvement$95kEducation$78kYouth Development$50kFood & Nutrition$35kOther$0
02FY2022 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROVIDENCE ST JOSEPH HEALTH FOUNDATION$3,000,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE VERDUGOS$1,400,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BURBANK TEMPORARY AID CENTER: $45k → 14%BURBANK TEMPORARY AID CENTER: $35k → 14%BURBANK TEMPORARY AID CENTER: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
PA
CA
MO
AZ
DC
LA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

15%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$565k · 10 repeat orgs$3.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +78% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2022, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
16

Total granted

$565k
$117k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+20%

Still filing today

50%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
EducationHousing & ShelterHealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    Burbank Housing Corporation
    2× · 2020–2021 · $95k · revenue +610%
  • BT
    BURBANK TEMPORARY AID CENTER INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $90k · revenue +39%
  • A
    ASCENCIA
    3× · 2017–2021 · $90k · revenue +120%

Funded once

  • HA
    HOME AGAIN LOS ANGELES
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +20%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES
    one grant, 2017 · $23k
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
2
Marshall B Ketchum University

To educate caring, inspired health care professionals who are prepared to deliver collaborative, patient-centric health care in an interprofessional environment.

Education
3
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
4
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
5
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
6
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
7
Scripps Health

Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)

Health
8
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
9
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
10
Charles R Drew University of Medicine and Science

Charles r. drew university of medicine and science is a private non-profit student-centered university that is committed to cultivating diverse health professional leaders who are dedicated to social justice and health equity for…

Education
11
Palo Alto University Inc

Advancing human understanding through education, research, and practice in behavioral science

Education
12
Occidental College

See schedule othe mission of occidental college is to provide a gifted and diverse group of students with a total educational experience of the highest quality - one that prepares them for leadership in an increasingly complex,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Burbank Housing Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Drexel University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PROVIDENCE ST JOSEPH HEALTH FOUNDATION: $3,000,000 · OtherPROVIDENCE ST JOSEPH HEALTH FOUNDATION+15 more: $330,860 · Other+15 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE VERDUGOS: $1,400,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE VER…Burbank Housing Corporation: $95,000 · Housing & ShelterASCENCIA: $90,000 · Housing & ShelterHOME AGAIN LOS ANGELES: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterBURBANK TEMPORARY AID CENTER INC: $90,000 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $13,570 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $6,785 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $6,785 · EducationWOODBURY UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PROVIDENCE: $5,000 · EducationKIDS COMMUNITY CLINIC OF BURBANK: $20,000 · HealthUSC VERDUGO HILLS HOSPITAL: $3,000 · HealthSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$3,330,860Philanthropy$1,400,000Housing & Shelter$210,000Human Services$90,000Education$37,140Health$23,000Recreation & Sports$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE VERDUGOS: $1,400,000 over 1y, 69% of budgetBurbank Housing Corporation: $95,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetBETTER BURBANK CORPORATION: $95,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetBURBANK TEMPORARY AID CENTER INC: $90,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetASCENCIA: $90,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetBRIDGING COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $40,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetHOME AGAIN LOS ANGELES: $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetKIDS COMMUNITY CLINIC OF BURBANK: $20,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $13,570 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $6,785 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $6,785 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOODBURY UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PROVIDENCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUSC VERDUGO HILLS HOSPITAL: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Providence Health & S…Providence Health Sys…Rotary Club of Burban…Community Foundation …California Community …Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Providence Health & Services Foundation San Fernando & Santa Clarita Valleys SaCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Providence Health & Services Foundation San Fernando & Santa Clarita Valleys Sa · Providence Health System - So California · Rotary Club of Burbank Sunrise - Jack Forsch Memorial Foundation · Community Foundation of the Verdugos · California Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Burbank Health Care Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Burbank Health Care Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Burbank Health Care Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Burbank Health Care Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Burbank Health Care’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home