Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bunge Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
65
Grants FY2025still arriving
19
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$1.9MCommunity Improvement$300kScience & Tech$205kEducation$113kPhilanthropy$100kArts & Culture$68kAnimals$59kReligion$53kOther$0
02FY2025 · 65 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k55 grants · $79k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $41k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $947k
$1,000
Median grant
19
States reached
$141k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROGRESSIVE AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION$200,000
NATIONAL FFA FOUNDATION$195,000
OPERATION FOOD SEARCH$175,000
ST LOUIS AREA FOODBANK INC$125,000
AGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMERICA$100,000
ST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC$100,000
ST LOUIS ZOOLOGICAL PARK$52,460
MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN$15,575
WHITE HOUSE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION$15,000
CHURCHILL CENTER & SCHOOL DISABILITIES$10,000
KINGDOM HOUSE DBA LIFEWISE STL$6,000
ST LOUIS ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION$5,250
DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER$5,000
LOUISIANA FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA$4,500
ALABAMA FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA$3,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%INTERNET ARCHIVE: $100 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
IL
MI
NY
OR
IA
IN
OH
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
KS
TN
SC
DC
LA
MS
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 51 repeat orgs$571k to everyone else

51 repeat relationships: 45 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
75

Total granted

$2.4M
$441k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+19%

Still filing today

57%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $129k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’24’25
EducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NF
    National FFA Foundation Inc
    3× · 2020–2025 · $495k · revenue +129%
  • AF
    AGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMERICA
    3× · 2020–2025 · $275k · revenue +52%
  • OF
    OPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $225k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • GS
    GREATER ST LOUIS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $300k · revenue 0%
  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • SP
    ST PAULS LUTHERAN CHURCH OF DES PER
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
4
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
5
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
6
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Webster University

Founded in 1915, webster is a private non-profit and global university that is committed to delivering high-quality learning experiences that transform students for global citizenship and individual excellence.

Education
9
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
10
Thomas Jefferson School

Thomas jefferson school engages its students in the education necessary to live as responsible citizens of the world. through the strongest possible college-prepatory program and within a nurturing community, students develop a…

—
11
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
12
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Missouri Botanical Garden Board of Trustees; the most unlike its peers is Internet Archive. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 147 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
67/68
Grantees still filing
43/68
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PROGRESSIVE AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION: $600,250 · Youth DevelopmentPROGRESSIVE AGRICULTURE FOUNDATIONNational FFA Foundation Inc: $495,000 · Youth DevelopmentNational FFA Foundation IncAGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMERICA: $275,000 · Youth DevelopmentAGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMERICA+2 more: $11,000 · Youth DevelopmentST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $250,000 · OtherST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INCST. LOUIS SCIENCE CENTER: $200,168 · OtherST. LOUIS SCIENCE CENTERST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · OtherST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION IN…ST LOUIS ZOOLOGICAL PARK: $59,625 · OtherST LOUIS ZOOLOGICAL PARKAMERICAN RED CROSS: $50,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS+86 more: $190,722 · Other+86 moreGREATER ST LOUIS INC: $300,000 · Community ImprovementGREATER ST …OPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC: $225,000 · Food & NutritionWHITE HOUSE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $60,000 · Arts & CultureST LOUIS ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $11,325 · Arts & Culture+14 more: $6,297 · Arts & CultureKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $12,100 · EducationDRAKE UNIVERSITY: $12,000 · EducationTHREE OAKS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL CORPORATION: $6,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $5,900 · EducationMENTORS 4 COLLEGE: $3,000 · EducationKINGDOM ACADEMY OF BLUFFTON INC: $3,000 · EducationPurdue Research Foundation: $3,000 · EducationFORSYTH SCHOOL INC: $3,000 · EducationTHE MOOG CENTER FOR DEAF EDUCATION: $2,500 · Education+21 more: $16,050 · EducationMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $32,367 · Environment+2 more: $1,090 · Environment
Youth Development$1,381,250Other$850,515Community Improvement$300,000Food & Nutrition$225,000Arts & Culture$77,622Education$66,550Environment$33,457

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPROGRESSIVE AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION: $600,250 over 3y, 23% of budgetNational FFA Foundation Inc: $495,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetGREATER ST LOUIS INC: $300,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetAGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMERICA: $275,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $250,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC: $225,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWHITE HOUSE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $32,367 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $12,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDRAKE UNIVERSITY: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $11,325 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHREE OAKS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL CORPORATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $5,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI FFA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMENTORS 4 COLLEGE: $3,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetKINGDOM ACADEMY OF BLUFFTON INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPurdue Research Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORSYTH SCHOOL INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MOOG CENTER FOR DEAF EDUCATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTAGES THEATRE COMPANY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBANK STREET COLLEGE OF EDUCATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $1,925 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST LUKE'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $1,485 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS TECH ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $1,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPEEKSKILL HERALD INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHeritage Classical Christian Academy: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEED ST LOUIS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMary Institute and St Louis Country Day School: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWETEACHTHINK: $1,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $625 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVSS CATHOLIC COMMUNICATIONS INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAlyssum Montessori School Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $425 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ODELL HOUSE ROCHAMBEAU HEADQUARTERS INC: $400 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDAYSPRING ARTS & EDUCATION: $310 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORT WAYNE CATHOLIC RADIO GROUPINC: $300 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PROGRESSIVE AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds National FFA Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds AGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds WHITE HOUSE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DRAKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds KINGDOM HOUSE D/B/A LIFEWISE STL ↗
  • Who funds THREE OAKS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI FFA FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO21.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · St Louis Community Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Edward Jones Foundation · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · Anheuser-Busch Foundation · Trio Foundation of St Louis · Washington University · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · The Prufrock Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bunge Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bunge Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Mote Marine Laboratory Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bunge Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Bunge Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 147 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bunge’s filings →

More from the funding graph