Skip to content

· Public charity

Bull Session Charity Golf Tournament

To raise funds for local children's charities through the sponsorship of an annual golf tournament and other events.

$239k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$974kHuman Services$252kRecreation & Sports$251k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $88k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $150k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$146k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROVIDENCE CHILDRENS' HEALTH FOUNDATION$50,000
WHEEL TO WALK$50,000
GALES CREEK CAMP FOUNDATION$50,000
ALBERTINA KERR$40,000
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$37,500
MARCH OF DIMES$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $189k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ALBERTINA KERR: $48k → 12%ALBERTINA KERR: $40k → 12%ALBERTINA KERR: $36k → 12%ALBERTINA KERR: $35k → 12%ALBERTINA KERR: $30k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Bull Session Charity Golf Tournament’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in OR; by stated purpose, 0%.

Bull Session Charity Golf Tournamentlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 7 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against -58% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
1

Total granted

$1.4M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
-58%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’23’24
HealthRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WT
    WHEEL TO WALK FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $285k · revenue +42%
  • GC
    GALES CREEK CAMP FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $251k · revenue +61%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    8× · 2017–2024 · $200k · revenue +120%

Funded once

  • AK
    ALBERTINA KERR CENTERS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $35k · revenue -58%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Providence Willamette Falls Medical Foundation

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Health
2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
Pacmed Clinics

Our mission is to provide respectful, high-quality, patient-focused healthcare to each person and to the communities we serve. pacmed welcomes patients from the well insured to those who cannot afford healthcare.

Health
4
Providence Little Company of Mary Foundation

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Philanthropy
5
Providence St Joseph Health Foundation

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Philanthropy
6
Covenant Health System Foundation

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Health
7
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
8
The Shriners' Hospital for Children

Shriners children's is committed to compassionate, high-quality care that improves children's lives, in a family-centered and collaborative environment. (continued on schedule o)

Health
9
Providence Trinitycare Hospice

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

—
10
Providence Newberg Health Foundation

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Health
11
Providence Health & Services

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Health
12
Providence Medical Institute

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Providence St Vincent Medical Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Wheel to Walk Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WHEEL TO WALK FOUNDATION: $284,801 · HealthWHEEL TO WALK FOUNDATIONMARCH OF DIMES INC: $250,435 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INCSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $200,084 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENPROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $90,000 · HealthPROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL FOUNDATIONGALES CREEK CAMP FOUNDATION: $250,851 · Recreation & SportsGALES CREEK CAMP FO…ALBERTINA KERR CENTERS: $188,851 · Human ServicesALBERTINA KERR…PROVIDENCE CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION: $177,358 · OtherPROVIDENCE CH…ALBERTINA KERR CENTERS FOUNDATION: $35,000 · Philanthropy
Health$825,320Recreation & Sports$250,851Human Services$188,851Other$177,358Philanthropy$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWHEEL TO WALK FOUNDATION: $284,801 over 8y, 19% of budgetGALES CREEK CAMP FOUNDATION: $250,851 over 8y, 9.2% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $250,435 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $200,084 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetALBERTINA KERR CENTERS: $188,851 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPROVIDENCE CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION: $177,358 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetPROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $90,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALBERTINA KERR CENTERS FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WHEEL TO WALK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GALES CREEK CAMP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds ALBERTINA KERR CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALBERTINA KERR CENTERS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Juan Young TrustOR17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Juan Young Trust · The Oregon Community Foundation · Providence Health & Services - Oregon · The Jackson Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bull Session Charity Golf Tournament funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bull Session Charity Golf Tournament. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 72%
  • Albertina Kerr Centers: 72% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bull Session Charity Golf Tournament’s filings →

More from the funding graph