Skip to content

· Private foundation

Building Futures Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$399k
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$140k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$1.9MArts & Culture$91kInternational$88kFood & Nutrition$82kPublic Safety & Disaster$55kReligion$40kHealth$31kHuman Services$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $76k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $133k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $190k
$3,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UCLA FOUNDATION$140,000
INDIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$50,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$40,000
GREAT CHICAGO FOOD$25,000
FRANCIS PARKER SCHOOL$22,500
FU-JEN UNIVERSITY$15,000
THE MARIN ARTS$10,000
LA FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION$10,000
HIGH JUMP$10,000
AABC$5,000
CHICAGO DANCE HEALTH$5,000
ROTARY DISTRICT 5170 FOUNDATION$5,000
READING PARTNERS$5,000
MOMS AGAINST POVERTY$4,000
STUF UNITED FUND$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $1k → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $1k → 7%MOMS AGAINST POVERTY: $4k → 10%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $1k → 7%MOMS AGAINST POVERTY: $4k → 10%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $1k → 7%MOMS AGAINST POVERTY: $3k → 10%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $1k → 7%MOMS AGAINST POVERTY: $3k → 10%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $500 → 7%MOMS AGAINST POVERTY: $3k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $40k → 14%MOMS AGAINST POVERTY: $3k → 10%MOMS AGAINST POVERTY: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IN
NJ
CT
CA
KY
VA
TN
DC
OK
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 38 repeat orgs$170k to everyone else

38 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
21

Total granted

$1.9M
$110k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+35%

Still filing today

42%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyCrime & LegalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Indiana University Foundation
    8× · 2018–2025 · $758k · revenue +30%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF SOOCHOW UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2019–2024 · $153k · revenue +56%
  • SU
    STUF UNITED FUND INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $26k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • SU
    STANFORD UNIVERSITYCANCER DISCOVERY FUN
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • SC
    SOUTHERN CA FOOD ALLERGY INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • TC
    THE CANAL ARTS
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fudan University Education Development Foundation

1) Support academic research and talents cultivation in Fudan University. 2) Promote higher education in Fudan University and other educational organizations in China. 3) Strengthen global cooperations of education and research. 4) Enhance…

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
4
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
5
United States-Japan Bridging Foundation Inc

The united states-japan bridging foundation provides u.s. undergraduates who demonstrate financial need and academic merit with scholarships to study abroad in japan, along with mentorship and networking opportunities.

International
6
Fudan Fuzhong Overseas Foundationinc

Fudan Fuzhong Overseas Foundation, Inc. ("FFOF") was established by five alumni from Fudan Fuzhong, the high school affiliated with Fudan University in Shanghai, China. Fudan University is one of the leading institutes of higher education…

Education
7
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
8
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
9
University of California San Francisco Foundation

Organization's mission ====================== the university of california, san francisco(ucsf) is among the world's leading universities dedicated to advancing health worldwide through biomedical research, graduate-level education in the…

Education
10
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
11
Roosevelt University

Roosevelt university is an independent, non-profit, metropolitan university and national leader in educating socially conscious citizens for active and dedicated lives as leaders in their professions and their communities. the university's…

—
12
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Map International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Soochow University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Indiana University Foundation: $758,000 · EducationIndiana University FoundationUCLA FOUNDATION: $305,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONFRIENDS OF SOOCHOW UNIVERSITY: $153,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF SOOCHOW UNIVERSITYFrancis W Parker School: $132,500 · EducationFrancis W Parker School+4 more: $71,000 · EducationFU-JEN UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · OtherFU-JEN UNIVERSITYHSING-PEI UNIVERSITY: $96,050 · OtherHSING-PEI UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $90,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNATIONAL CHUNG HSING UNIVERSITY: $48,600 · OtherNATIONAL CHUNG HSING UNIVERSITYGREAT CHICAGO FOOD: $45,000 · OtherGREAT CHICAGO FOODAABC: $45,000 · OtherAABC+43 more: $315,100 · Other+43 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $40,000 · Human ServicesMOMS AGAINST POVERTY: $23,000 · Human ServicesCharity Navigator: $5,500 · Human ServicesMAP International Inc: $21,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF: $18,000 · InternationalSHIN SHIN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $3,000 · InternationalSTUF UNITED FUND INC: $26,000 · PhilanthropyCBC Foundation: $10,000 · PhilanthropyRotary District 5170 Foundation: $24,000 · Community ImprovementTAO AND ZEN SOCIETY OF USA: $23,000 · Religion
Education$1,419,500Other$739,750Human Services$68,500International$42,000Philanthropy$36,000Community Improvement$24,000Religion$23,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIndiana University Foundation: $758,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $305,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF SOOCHOW UNIVERSITY: $153,000 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetFrancis W Parker School: $132,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTUF UNITED FUND INC: $26,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetREADING PARTNERS: $26,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRotary District 5170 Foundation: $24,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetMOMS AGAINST POVERTY: $23,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTAO AND ZEN SOCIETY OF USA: $23,000 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetMAP International Inc: $21,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $18,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST BOOK: $17,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH JUMP: $13,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCBC Foundation: $10,000 over 2y, 46% of budgetCharity Navigator: $5,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHIN SHIN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAlive and Free: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF SOOCHOW UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Francis W Parker School ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds STUF UNITED FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds Rotary District 5170 Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MOMS AGAINST POVERTY ↗
  • Who funds TAO AND ZEN SOCIETY OF USA ↗
  • Who funds MAP International Inc ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds FIRST BOOK ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HIGH JUMP ↗
  • Who funds CBC Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA11.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Building Futures Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Building Futures Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Aleph Institute Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Building Futures’ filings →

More from the funding graph