· Private foundation
Bucks Creek Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k46 grants · $159k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $298k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $235k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INC | $75,000 |
| ST THOMAS THE APOSTLE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH CORPOR | $60,000 |
| NATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| THE CARVER INC | $50,000 |
| BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY | $40,000 |
| ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ALLIANCE WORLDWIDE | $40,000 |
| NORWALK HOUSING FOUNDATION INC | $25,000 |
| SHEPHERDS INC | $25,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS FOUNDATION OF INDIAN RIVER COUN | $25,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF CAPE COD | $20,000 |
| ST THOMAS THE APOSTLE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH CORPOR | $20,000 |
| JANE DOE NO MORE INCORPORATED | $20,000 |
| BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY | $15,000 |
| INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HFH | $15,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND | $12,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
90 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2024, 53 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $210k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EAEDUCATION AND HOPE INC7× · 2017–2024 · $752k · revenue +16% · 29% of their budget
- CSCOMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL INC3× · 2017–2019 · $635k · revenue +82%
- TOTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS8× · 2017–2024 · $470k · revenue +44%
Funded once
- STST THOMAS THE APOSTLE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH CORPORATIONone grant, 2019 · $177k
GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -40%- JYJuntos y Unidos por Puerto Rico Incone grant, 2018 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.
To provide excellence and access in private higher education to those who seek to expand their knowledge and prepare themselves for meaningful, educated lives and for service to their communities and the world.
Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
To manage the brooklyn navy yard for the city of new york, specifically to expand job opportunities for new yorkers by fostering the development of small businesses.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Open new york education, inc. supports public education, awareness, and engagement around housing issues to help build a movement for a more abundant and inclusive new york.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Destiny Housing Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
125 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 125 of the 149 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EDUCATION AND HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CARVER INC ↗
- Who funds THE OPEN DOOR SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds Bucknell University ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERDS INC ↗
- Who funds THE WILFREDO PEREZ JR MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
- Who funds GUARDIANS FOR NEW FUTURES INC ↗
- Who funds NORWALK HOUSING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY & CHILDREN'S AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds JANE DOE NO MORE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND ↗
- Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOUNDATION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds CAPE AND ISLANDS UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds REMOTE AREA MEDICAL ↗
- Who funds UNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC ↗
- Who funds Visiting Nurse Association and Hospice Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Juntos y Unidos por Puerto Rico Inc ↗
- Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY RESOURCE EXCHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ALLIANCE WORLDWIDE ↗
- Who funds HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES ↗
- Who funds MERCY LEARNING CENTER OF BRIDGEPORT INC ↗
- Who funds MALTA HOUSE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · New Canaan Community Foundation Inc · The Near and Far Association Inc · Peoples United Community Foundation · Young Mens Christian Association of Westport/Weston Ct Inc · The Aiello Charitable Foundation Inc · The Scripps Family Fund for Education and the Arts · Indian River Community Foundation Inc · Newman's Own Foundation · The John and Ethel Kashulon Foundation · Ritter Family Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bucks Creek Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Keystone House Inc — 66% of income from government
- Kids in Crisis Inc — 49% of income from government
- Family & Children's Agency Inc — 47% of income from government
- Mid-Fairfield Child Guidance Center Inc — 30% of income from government
- The Carver Inc — 16% of income from government
- The Open Door Shelter Inc — 14% of income from government
- The Norwalk Symphony Society Inc — 13% of income from government
- Guardians for New Futures Inc — 11% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Lower Cape Outreach Councilinc — 6% of income from government
- The Maritime Aquarium at Norwalk Inc — 5% of income from government
- Mercy Learning Center of Bridgeport Inc — 4% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
- Treasure Coast Food Bank Inc — 2% of income from government
- Mcgivney Community Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- United Way of Indian River County Inc — 1% of income from government
- Stepping Stones Museum for Children Inc — 1% of income from government
- Sage Eldercare — 1% of income from government
- Indian River Land Trust Inc — 0% of income from government
- We Can Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Aurora Women and Girls Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Learning Alliance Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Bucks Creek Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Bucks Creek Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.