Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bt Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Science & Tech$2.3MHealth$1.1MEducation$415kEnvironment$150kYouth Development$145kArts & Culture$50kFood & Nutrition$40kPhilanthropy$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.7M
  • $250k+5 grants · $2.9M
$125,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC - DR JACOB HA$1,000,000
AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC - DR MICHAL L$625,000
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - DR KIMBERLY SEE$621,784
IMAGINE WORLDWIDE$400,000
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - DR LIHONG WONG$300,000
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - KIESSLING GROUP$150,000
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - COLLINS LAB$150,000
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - NUCLEAR REACTOR LAB$150,000
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - DR VIVIANA GRADINARU$150,000
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$150,000
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - FURST LAB$150,000
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - DENNIS WHYTE JEFFREY FREIDBERG$150,000
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - TSAI LAB$125,000
BEAM CENTER INC$125,000
NYC FIRST INC$125,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HAYWOOD CHRISTIAN MINISTRY: $10k → 12%GIRLS WHO CODE: $5k → 17%GIRLS WHO CODE: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
NC
SC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.2M · 22 repeat orgs$3.7M to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
12

Total granted

$5.2M
$385k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+6%

Still filing today

55%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NF
    NYC FIRST Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $305k · revenue +263%
  • BROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $110k · revenue +6%
  • AM
    American Museum of Natural History
    2× · 2024–2025 · $100k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE - DR HANNA'S LAB
    one grant, 2024 · $150k
  • LE
    LOWER EASTSIDE GIRLS CLUB STEM PROGRAM
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • QP
    QUEENS PUBLICS LIBRARY
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Hall of Science

Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…

Arts & Culture
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
Girls in Stem
Human Services
4
City Growers Inc

Through our original curriculum design that uses innovative growing spaces on rooftop farms, in school gardens, and public parks - city growers fosters a love of nature and encourages nyc youth to consider their place, agency, and future…

Food & Nutrition
5
Futures Ignite Inc

We amplify youth and community power by inspiring, guiding, and advocating for youth to determine their college, career, and leadership futures.

Human Services
6
Liberty Science Center

To inspire the next generation of scientists and engineers and excite learners of all ages about the power, promise, and pure fun of science and technology.lsc offers exceptional science learning onsite, offsite, and online as well as…

Arts & Culture
7
Technyc Inc

An engaged network of tech leaders working to foster a dynamic, diverse, and creative new york. we bring together new yorkers to support a successful technology ecosystem, attract and retain top-tier talent, and celebrate new york and the…

Community Improvement
8
Future Problem Solving Program International Inc

Future problem solving proudly celebrates more than 50 years of placing close to a million young people at the core of a dynamic, purposeful learning experience. each year k-12 students from around the world participate in a variety of…

—
9
Edible Schoolyard New York

Edible schoolyard nyc is on a mission to make edible education accessible for every child in nyc. we believe edible education-where kids experience hands-on cooking and gardening helps kids gain the skills to contribute to a healthy and…

Education
10
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
11
Stem Alliance of Larchmont- Mamaroneck Inc

Through a combination of stem enrichment, digital inclusion, and summer learning programs, the stem alliance advances equal opportunity in education. our evidence-based model has 5 differentiating factors.high quality: our hands-on,…

Youth Development
12
Teachers College Columbia University

Teachers College, Columbia Universitys (TC or the College) mission is to empower committed learners and leaders to build a smarter, healthier, more just and equitable world through multidisciplinary knowledge creation, policy engagement,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Queens Library Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Museum of Natural History. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
14/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC - DR JACOB HA: $1,000,000 · OtherAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC - DR JACOB HAMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - JAMEEL CLINIC: $900,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - JAMEEL CLINICMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - TSAI LAB: $650,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - TSAI LABAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC - DR MICHAL L: $625,000 · OtherAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC - DR MICHAL LCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - DR KIMBERLY SEE: $621,784 · OtherCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - DR KIMBERLY SEEMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - ZHANG LAB: $600,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - ZHANG LABMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - NUCLEAR REACTOR LAB: $450,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - NUCLEAR REACTOR LABMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - COLLINS LAB: $300,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - DR LIHONG WONG: $300,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - KIESSLING GROUP: $300,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - DENNIS WHYTE JEFFREY FREIDBERG: $300,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - FURST LAB: $300,000 · Other+19 more: $900,000 · Other+19 moreCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $500,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA…Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $150,000 · EducationMassachuse…BROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $110,000 · EducationBROOKLYN P…MOUSE INC: $50,000 · EducationMOUSE INCSCRIPTED INC DBA CODE NATION: $35,000 · Education+1 more: $20,000 · EducationIMAGINE WORLDWIDE: $400,000 · Community ImprovementNYC FIRST Inc: $305,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE LOWER EAST SIDE GIRLS CLUB OF NEW YORK INC: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentAmerican Museum of Natural History: $100,000 · Arts & CultureUNITED WAY OF ASHEVILLE AND BUNCOMBE COUNTY INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyHenderson County United Way Inc: $20,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HENDERSON COUNTY INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyFEEDING AVERY FAMILIES INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionWNC Communities: $10,000 · Food & NutritionMCDOWELL LFAC: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$7,246,784Education$865,000Community Improvement$400,000Youth Development$345,000Arts & Culture$100,000Philanthropy$60,000Food & Nutrition$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $500,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNYC FIRST Inc: $305,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEAM CENTER INC: $125,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetBROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $110,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HARLEM INC: $55,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetMOUSE INC: $50,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTHE QUEENS LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE LOWER EAST SIDE GIRLS CLUB OF NEW YORK INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSCRIPTED INC DBA CODE NATION: $35,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFEEDING AVERY FAMILIES INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ASHEVILLE AND BUNCOMBE COUNTY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHenderson County United Way Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HENDERSON COUNTY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTEM KIDS NYC: $20,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWNC Communities: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMCDOWELL LFAC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHaywood Christian Ministry Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds IMAGINE WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds NYC FIRST Inc ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds BEAM CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds American Museum of Natural History ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HARLEM INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE QUEENS LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LOWER EAST SIDE GIRLS CLUB OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds SCRIPTED INC DBA CODE NATION ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING AVERY FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF ASHEVILLE AND BUNCOMBE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Henderson County United Way Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HENDERSON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds STEM KIDS NYC ↗
  • Who funds WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS WHO CODE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dogwood Health TrustNC17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dogwood Health Trust · The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Wnc Bridge Foundation · Manna Food Bank Inc · Pinkerton Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Duke Energy Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bt Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bt Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bt Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bt Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bt’s filings →

    More from the funding graph