· Private foundation
Bryce Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FRIENDLY HOUSE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER | $8,000 |
| FOOD BANK OF CNY | $4,500 |
| THE SAMARITAN CENTER | $3,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE NIGHT PEOPLE | $3,000 |
| SHARE OUR STRENGTH | $3,000 |
| COVENANT HOUSE | $3,000 |
| TOGETHER WE RISE | $3,000 |
| THEODORE ROOSEVELT ASSOCIATION | $3,000 |
| CNY CAT COALITION INC | $3,000 |
| TEN LIVES CLUB | $3,000 |
| EASTER SEALS SOUTHWEST FLORIDA | $3,000 |
| CAPE FEAR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $2,500 |
| ERIE COUNTY SPCA | $2,500 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE | $2,000 |
| INTERRELIGIOUS FOOD CONSORTIUM | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
52 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC6× · 2017–2022 · $46k · revenue +150%- FOFRIENDS OF NIGHT PEOPLE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $32k · revenue +130%
- SCSAMARITAN CENTER INC9× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +108%
Funded once
- TRTHEORDORE ROOSEVELT INAUGURAL SITEone grant, 2022 · $5k
- LFLIBRARY FOUNDATION OF BUFFALOone grant, 2022 · $5k
The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Incgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue +183%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.
To save the lives of animals through rescue, rehabilitation and adoption; to promote learning, eliminate animal cruelty and be a leader in advancing the highest standards in animal welfare.
Together with our community, we better the lives of animals through justice, prevention, and life-saving care. lollypop farm, the humane society of greater rochester, envisions a just and compassionate world for all animals.
Create a more humane world by inspiring compassion, providing hope and advancing the welfare of animals and people.
We rescue cats and dogs suffered on the street and in endangered locations in both new york and china. the mission of our no-kill shelter is to provide stray cats with safe haven and veterinary care before placing them in forever loving…
Pet pride of new york has been saving homeless cats and matching them with caring adopters since 1977. we operate a no-kill cat sanctuary and adoption center with an on-site veterinary medical center where we shelter and care for cats and…
Spca tampa bay is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that operates pinellas county's only nonprofit for-all animal shelter assisting all animals in need, regardless of species or circumstance, at its 10-acre campus in largo. (continued on…
The jacksonville humane society provides care, comfort and compassion to animals in need while engaging the hearts, hands and minds of our community to bring about an end to the killing of abandoned and orphaned shelter animals.
Located in raleigh, nc, the spca of wake county works in over half the state of north carolina through collaborative partnerships that save pets and help people. significant activities include: decreasing the number of animals entering…
We transform the lives of animals with compassionate care and services, outstanding educational programs, and advocacy for all animals.
Pet animal welfare society of ct (paws), established in 1962, is a no-kill animal rescue shelter dedicated to the rescue and adoption of our community's homeless and abused dogs and cats. paws efforts are focused on three critical needs:…
HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding Pets of the Homeless Aka Pets of the Homeless and the most unlike its peers is Chatham Ecumenical Council Helping Prevent Homelessness Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF NIGHT PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FEEDING PETS OF THE HOMELESS AKA PETS OF THE HOMELESS ↗
- Who funds Central New York Cat Coalition Inc ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
- Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF BUFFALO INC ↗
- Who funds TOGETHER WE RISE ↗
- Who funds SKANEATELES ECUMENICAL FOOD PANTRY ↗
- Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
- Who funds CAPE FEAR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds INTERRELIGIOUS FOOD CONSORTIUM ↗
- Who funds PAWS4PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY PANTRY OF CAPE COD CORP ↗
- Who funds CAPE COD TIMES NEIGHBORS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds WILDLIFE CENTER OF VENICE INC ↗
- Who funds TEN LIVES CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds WINGS FLIGHTS OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF BOSTON ↗
- Who funds SAVE OUR SEABIRDS INC ↗
- Who funds Theodore Roosevelt Association ↗
- Who funds NEW HANOVER HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds ERIE COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds SKANEATELES LAKE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Central New York Community Foundation Inc · Cc Sand Dollar Charitable Foundation · Equitable Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Collier Community Foundation Inc · The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals · Froelich Family Foundation · The Saperston Family Foundation · E&W G Foundation · Allyn Family Foundation Inc · Baker Hughes Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bryce Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Easter Seals Southwest Florida Inc — 12% of income from government
- Lower Cape Outreach Councilinc — 6% of income from government
- All Faiths Food Bank Inc — 1% of income from government
- Animal Rescue League of Boston — 0% of income from government
- The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Bryce Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Bryce Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.