Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bruno and Evelyne Betti Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.0M
Granted FY2021
13
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$1.6M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

71% of Bruno and Evelyne Betti Foundation’s FY2021 grant dollars went to Central Montana Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

3
’17
3
’18
4
’19
2
’20
3
’21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Philanthropy$12MEducation$6.7MReligion$1.0MHuman Services$500kYouth Development$411kRecreation & Sports$129kArts & Culture$124kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2021 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $43k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $305k
  • $250k+7 grants · $5.6M
$400,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL MONTANA FOUNDATION$1,600,000
CENTRAL MONTANA FOUNDATION$1,410,000
SOUTH PUGET SOUND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$605,000
ST MARTINS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$605,000
ST JOHN'S LUTHERAN MINISTRIES FOUNDATION$500,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL WASHINGTON$500,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL WASHINGTON$400,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH PUDGET SOUND$200,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL WASHINGTON$105,000
CENTRAL MONTANA FOUNDATION$20,000
TENINO BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$13,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY$10,000
METHOW VALLEY RIDING UNLIMITED$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $139k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%THE COVE: $10k → 17%METHOW VALLEY RIDING UNLIMITED: $108k → 17%METHOW VALLEY RIDING UNLIMITED: $5k → 9%METHOW VALLEY RIDING UNLIMITED: $8k → 17%METHOW VALLEY RIDING UNLIMITED: $8k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.3M · 8 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2021, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$7.3M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+466%

Still filing today

38%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $523k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SOUTH PUGET SOUND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $3.1M · revenue +79% · 53% of their budget
  • SM
    SAINT MARTINS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $2.8M
  • SM
    ST MARTINS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $755k

Funded once

  • SJ
    ST JOHNS UNITED FKA ST JOHNS LUTHERAN MINISTRIES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M
  • TC
    THE COVE
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -24%
  • LR
    LACEY ROTARY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +466%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Foundation of Snohomish County

The Community Foundation of Snohomish County (the Foundation) is a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization incorporated under the laws of the State of Washington. The Foundation serves as a community foundation, supporting a broad spectrum of…

Philanthropy
2
Seattle Chamber Music Society Foundation

Provide financial support to the Seattle Chamber Music Festival (dba Seattle Chamber Music Society).

Arts & Culture
3
Methow Valley Education Foundation

Provide educational opportunities to local students

—
4
Clatsop Community College Foundation

The CCC Foundation generates resources to support higher education within Clatsop County. The CCC Foundation seeks funding for scholarships, educational programs, buildings and equipment, cultural and performing arts, and other needs of…

—
5
United Way of Skagit County

United Way of Skagit County's mission is to build a positive and sustainable quality of life for all.

Philanthropy
6
North Mason Scholarship Foundation

The corporation is organized exclusively for charitable purposes within the meaning of 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Specifically, the corporation is organized to raise and distribute funds for scholarships to support further…

—
7
Foundation for the Seattle Colleges

The Foundation for the Seattle Colleges exists to advance fundraising efforts for the Seattle Community College District. We seek to attract financial resources which support students so they may be successful; maintain the quality and…

—
8
Rotary Foundation of the South Puget Sound Rotary Club
Education
9
Mount Baker Foundation
Philanthropy
10
South Seattle College Foundation

Our mission is to change lives by providing students with scholarships so they can pursue quality academic and vocational education. we do this through relationship building, fundraising and stewarding resources.

Education
11
Whidbey Community Foundation

Strengthening the communities of whidbey island for both present and future generations.

Philanthropy
12
Cheh River Basin Land Trust

To conserve, protect and restore ecologically significant lands within the Chehalis River Basin

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of South Puget Sound; the most unlike its peers is Methow Music Festival Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Community Foundation of South Puget Sound: $6,336,500 · PhilanthropyThe Community Foundation of South Puget SoundCENTRAL MONTANA FOUNDATION: $3,045,000 · PhilanthropyCENTRAL MONTANA FOUNDATIONCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NCW: $2,805,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NCWSAINT MARTINS FOUNDATION: $2,811,000 · OtherSAINT MARTINS FOUNDATIONST JOHNS UNITED FKA ST JOHNS LUTHERAN MINISTRIES FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · OtherST JOHNS UNITED FKA ST JOHNS …ST MARTINS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $755,000 · OtherST MARTINS UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT…ST JOHN'S LUTHERAN MINISTRIES FOUNDATION: $500,000 · OtherST JOHN'S LUTHERAN MINISTRIES…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $388,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB+4 more: $31,000 · OtherSOUTH PUGET SOUND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $3,128,500 · EducationSOUTH PUGET SOUN…METHOW VALLEY RIDING UNLIMITED: $128,500 · Human ServicesTHE COVE: $10,000 · Human ServicesMethow Music Festival Association: $123,500 · Arts & CultureBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $10,000 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$12,186,500Other$5,485,000Education$3,128,500Human Services$138,500Arts & Culture$123,500Youth Development$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Community Foundation of South Puget Sound: $6,336,500 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetSOUTH PUGET SOUND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $3,128,500 over 5y, 53% of budgetCENTRAL MONTANA FOUNDATION: $3,045,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NCW: $2,805,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetMETHOW VALLEY RIDING UNLIMITED: $128,500 over 4y, 59% of budgetMethow Music Festival Association: $123,500 over 3y, 73% of budgetTHE COVE: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLACEY ROTARY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 10% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Community Foundation of South Puget Sound ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH PUGET SOUND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL MONTANA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NCW ↗
  • Who funds METHOW VALLEY RIDING UNLIMITED ↗
  • Who funds Methow Music Festival Association ↗
  • Who funds THE COVE ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds LACEY ROTARY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Moccasin Lake FoundationDE13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Moccasin Lake Foundation · Community Foundation of Ncw · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bruno and Evelyne Betti Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bruno and Evelyne Betti Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bruno and Evelyne Betti Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bruno and Evelyne Betti Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bruno and Evelyne Betti’s filings →

    More from the funding graph