Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bruno and Evelyne Betti Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.0M
Granted FY2021
13
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$1.6M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

71% of Bruno and Evelyne Betti Foundation’s FY2021 grant dollars went to Central Montana Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

3
17
3
18
4
19
2
20
3
21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Philanthropy$12MEducation$6.7MReligion$1.0MHuman Services$500kYouth Development$411kRecreation & Sports$129kArts & Culture$124kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2021 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $43k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $305k
  • $250k+7 grants · $5.6M
$400,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL MONTANA FOUNDATION$1,600,000
CENTRAL MONTANA FOUNDATION$1,410,000
ST MARTINS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$605,000
SOUTH PUGET SOUND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$605,000
ST JOHN'S LUTHERAN MINISTRIES FOUNDATION$500,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL WASHINGTON$500,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL WASHINGTON$400,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH PUDGET SOUND$200,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL WASHINGTON$105,000
CENTRAL MONTANA FOUNDATION$20,000
TENINO BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$13,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY$10,000
METHOW VALLEY RIDING UNLIMITED$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $139k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%THE COVE: $10k → 17%METHOW VALLEY RIDING UNLIMITED: $108k → 17%METHOW VALLEY RIDING UNLIMITED: $5k → 9%METHOW VALLEY RIDING UNLIMITED: $8k → 17%METHOW VALLEY RIDING UNLIMITED: $8k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.3M · 8 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2021, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$7.3M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+466%

Still filing today

38%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $523k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SOUTH PUGET SOUND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $3.1M · revenue +79% · 53% of their budget
  • SM
    SAINT MARTINS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $2.8M
  • SM
    ST MARTINS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $755k

Funded once

  • SJ
    ST JOHNS UNITED FKA ST JOHNS LUTHERAN MINISTRIES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M
  • TC
    THE COVE
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -24%
  • LR
    LACEY ROTARY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +466%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Foundation of Snohomish County

The Community Foundation of Snohomish County (the Foundation) is a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization incorporated under the laws of the State of Washington. The Foundation serves as a community foundation, supporting a broad spectrum of…

Philanthropy
2
Seattle Chamber Music Society Foundation

Provide financial support to the Seattle Chamber Music Festival (dba Seattle Chamber Music Society).

Arts & Culture
3
Methow Valley Education Foundation

Provide educational opportunities to local students

4
Clatsop Community College Foundation

The CCC Foundation generates resources to support higher education within Clatsop County. The CCC Foundation seeks funding for scholarships, educational programs, buildings and equipment, cultural and performing arts, and other needs of…

5
United Way of Skagit County

United Way of Skagit County's mission is to build a positive and sustainable quality of life for all.

Philanthropy
6
North Mason Scholarship Foundation

The corporation is organized exclusively for charitable purposes within the meaning of 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Specifically, the corporation is organized to raise and distribute funds for scholarships to support further…

7
Foundation for the Seattle Colleges

The Foundation for the Seattle Colleges exists to advance fundraising efforts for the Seattle Community College District. We seek to attract financial resources which support students so they may be successful; maintain the quality and…

8
Rotary Foundation of the South Puget Sound Rotary Club
Education
9
Mount Baker Foundation
Philanthropy
10
South Seattle College Foundation

Our mission is to change lives by providing students with scholarships so they can pursue quality academic and vocational education. we do this through relationship building, fundraising and stewarding resources.

Education
11
Whidbey Community Foundation

Strengthening the communities of whidbey island for both present and future generations.

Philanthropy
12
Cheh River Basin Land Trust

To conserve, protect and restore ecologically significant lands within the Chehalis River Basin

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of South Puget Sound and the most unlike its peers is Methow Music Festival Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The Community Foundation of South Puget Sound — $6,336,500 · PhilanthropyThe Community Foundation of South Puget SoundCENTRAL MONTANA FOUNDATION — $3,045,000 · PhilanthropyCENTRAL MONTANA FOUNDATIONCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NCW — $2,805,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NCWSAINT MARTINS FOUNDATION — $2,811,000 · OtherSAINT MARTINS FOUNDATIONST JOHNS UNITED FKA ST JOHNS LUTHERAN MINISTRIES FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 · OtherST JOHNS UNITED FKA ST JOHNS …ST MARTINS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $755,000 · OtherST MARTINS UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT…ST JOHN'S LUTHERAN MINISTRIES FOUNDATION — $500,000 · OtherST JOHN'S LUTHERAN MINISTRIES…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $388,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB+4 more — $31,000 · OtherSOUTH PUGET SOUND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $3,128,500 · EducationSOUTH PUGET SOUN…METHOW VALLEY RIDING UNLIMITED — $128,500 · Human ServicesTHE COVE — $10,000 · Human ServicesMethow Music Festival Association — $123,500 · Arts & CultureBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY — $10,000 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$12,186,500Other$5,485,000Education$3,128,500Human Services$138,500Arts & Culture$123,500Youth Development$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Community Foundation of South Puget Sound — $6,336,500 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetSOUTH PUGET SOUND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $3,128,500 over 5y, 53% of budgetCENTRAL MONTANA FOUNDATION — $3,045,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NCW — $2,805,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetMETHOW VALLEY RIDING UNLIMITED — $128,500 over 4y, 59% of budgetMethow Music Festival Association — $123,500 over 3y, 73% of budgetTHE COVE — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLACEY ROTARY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 10% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Community Foundation of South Puget Sound
  • Who funds SOUTH PUGET SOUND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CENTRAL MONTANA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NCW
  • Who funds METHOW VALLEY RIDING UNLIMITED
  • Who funds Methow Music Festival Association
  • Who funds THE COVE
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY
  • Who funds LACEY ROTARY FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Moccasin Lake FoundationDE13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Moccasin Lake Foundation · Community Foundation of Ncw · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bruno and Evelyne Betti Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bruno and Evelyne Betti Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bruno and Evelyne Betti Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph