Skip to content

Minnesota · Private foundation

Bruce Ronald & Phyllis M Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$22k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
5
Grants FY2025
4
Organizations funded FY2024
25%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$5,000
Organizations funded a year
4 to 5
FY2019 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$414k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 25% of the organizations Bruce Ronald & Phyllis M Trust funded were first-time grantees, receiving 25% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving5$22k20%
FY20244$20k25%
FY20234$18k25%
FY20224$20k25%
FY20214$16k0%
FY20205$16k20%
FY20195$16kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Animals$128k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($17k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Bruce Ronald & Phyllis M Trust supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCARE4Paws Inc: $29,625 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetSanta Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $19,375 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAnimal Shelter Assistance Program: $15,625 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTherapy Dogs of Santa Barbara Inc: $11,375 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetSanta Maria Valley Humane Society: $11,250 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetK-9 Placement and Assistance League Inc: $10,250 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetSanta Ynez Valley Humane Society: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetShadows Fund Incorporated: $3,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Barbara FoundationCA21.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Barbara Foundation · Animal Charitable Foundation Santa Barbara County Inc · The Wood-Claeyssens Foundation · Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation · Resqcats Inc · Chrissie's Fund a Delaware Trust · Balin Hildegard Charit Tua-Main · Ethel Frends Charitable Foundation · Bragg Health Foundation · Walter J & Holly O Thomson Charitable · Roy and Ida Eagle Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Bruce Ronald & Phyllis M Trust with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bruce Ronald & Phyllis M Trust?

Find your warmest path to Bruce Ronald & Phyllis M Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Bruce Ronald & Phyllis M Trust

How much does Bruce Ronald & Phyllis M Trust give?
Bruce Ronald & Phyllis M Trust reported 5 grants totaling $22,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 5 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2024.
What does Bruce Ronald & Phyllis M Trust fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2025, its largest causes are Animals (100%).
Who are Bruce Ronald & Phyllis M Trust's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2025: CARE4Paws Inc ($30k), Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals ($19k), Animal Shelter Assistance Program ($16k).
Does Bruce Ronald & Phyllis M Trust fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 25% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Bruce Ronald & Phyllis M Trust accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Bruce Ronald & Phyllis M Trust?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Santa Barbara Foundation, Animal Charitable Foundation Santa Barbara County Inc, The Wood-Claeyssens Foundation.
Where is Bruce Ronald & Phyllis M Trust based?
Bruce Ronald & Phyllis M Trust is based in MN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bruce Ronald & Phyllis M’s filings →

More from the funding graph