Skip to content

· Private foundation

Brown F Finch Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$116k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$232kEducation$172kHuman Services$148kHealth$115kRecreation & Sports$99kCommunity Improvement$25kEnvironment$15kPublic Benefit$12k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $111k
$35,577
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NOVANT HEALTH FOUNDATION$45,000
COOPERATIVE COMMUNITY MINISTRY$35,577
HPT4LIFE$30,000
MEMORIAL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 18% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%TOM A FINCH COMMUNITY YMCA: $45k → 13%ARBOR ACRES UNITED METHODIST: $23k → 15%GREENSBORO COLLEGE INC: $5k → 16%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%THOMASVILLE CITY SCHOOLS: $36k → 13%NOVANT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $45k → 15%GUILFORD COLLEGE: $5k → 16%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 11%COOPERATIVE COMMUNITY MINISTRY: $36k → 13%NOVANT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $25k → 15%TOM A FINCH COMMUNITY YMCA: $35k → 13%NOVANT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $25k → 15%HPT4LIFE: $30k → 13%THOMASVILLE CITY SCHOOLS: $29k → 13%SAINTSING ATHLETICS: $25k → 13%THOMASVILLE CITY SCHOOLS: $23k → 13%COOPERATIVE COMMUNITY MINISTRY: $20k → 13%COOPERATIVE COMMUNITY MINISTRY: $20k → 13%HPT4LIFE CORP: $20k → 13%COOPERATIVE COMMUNITY MINISTRY: $20k → 13%COOPERATIVE COMMUNITY MINISTRY: $16k → 13%THOMASVILLE CITY SCHOOLS: $15k → 13%TOM A FINCH COMMUNITY YMCA: $15k → 13%COOPERATIVE COMMUNITY: $15k → 13%HPT4LIFE CORP: $15k → 13%TOM A FINCH COMMUNITY YMCA: $15k → 13%THOMASVILLE CITY SCHOOLS: $15k → 13%TOM A FINCH COMMUNITY YMCA: $15k → 13%THOMASVILLE CITY SCHOOLS: $14k → 13%TOM A FINCH COMMUNITY YMCA: $13k → 13%COOPERATIVE COMMUNITY MINISTRY: $12k → 13%COOPERATIVE COMMUNITY: $10k → 13%TOM A FINCH COMMUNITY YMCA: $10k → 13%CITY OF THOMASVILLE: $9k → 13%SAINTSING ATHLETICS: $9k → 13%THOMASVILLE CITY SCHOOLS: $5k → 13%NOVANT HEALTH THOMASVILLE MED CTR: $5k → 13%CITY OF THOMASVILLE: $3k → 13%EMPOWER BREASTFEEDING: $2k → 13%CITY OF THOMASVILLE: $200 → 13%HOSPICE OF DAVIDSON COUNTY NC: $8k → 13%HOSPICE OF DAVIDSON COUNTY: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Brown F Finch Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 0% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 9%.

Brown F Finch Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$765k · 11 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
7

Total granted

$765k
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+7%

Still filing today

36%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    TOM A FINCH COMMUNITY YMCA INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $148k · revenue -13%
  • TC
    THOMASVILLE CITY SCHOOLS
    7× · 2018–2024 · $137k
  • CC
    COOPERATIVE COMMUNITY MINISTRY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $124k

Funded once

  • AA
    ARBOR ACRES UNITED METHODIST
    one grant, 2018 · $23k
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF DAVIDSON COUNTY NC
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
  • GUILFORD COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -91%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greenville College

To transform students for lives of character and service through a christ-centered education.

Education
2
Barton College

Founded in 1902, barton college is a four-year, private, liberal arts college located in wilson, n.c. the barton experience focuses on academic excellence within a wide range of professional and liberal arts programs leading to…

Education
3
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
4
Hampden-Sydney College

Since 1775, the mission of Hampden-Sydney College has been to form good men and good citizens in an atmosphere of sound learning.

Education
5
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
6
Lehigh University

Lehigh university strives to earn international prominence as a universty of special distinction and provide students with opportunities for success through its integration of teaching, research and service to society.

Education
7
Tusculum University

Being PIONEER Ready calls each of us to be Proactive, Interactive, Organized, Nettie-like (service-minded), Engaged, Ethical, and Responsible! Tusculum University seeks to instill in its graduates a sense of the world in which they live…

Education
8
Gordon College

Gordon college strives to graduate men & women distinguished by (continued on schedule o) (continuation) intellectual maturity and christian character, committed to lives of service and prepared for leadership worldwide.

Education
9
Houghton University

A nationally ranked christian university founded by the wesleyan church.

Education
10
Drake University

See schedule o.drake's mission is to provide an exceptional learning environment that prepares students for meaningful personal lives, professional accomplishments, and responsible global citizenship. the drake experience is distinguished…

Education
11
Furman University

Furman university is an institution of higher education providing distinctive undergraduate education emphasizing an engaged approach combining classroom learning with real world experiences and self-discovery.

Education
12
William Peace University

Prepare students for careers in the organizations of tomorrow.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greensboro College; the most unlike its peers is HPT4LIFE Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
3/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TOM A FINCH COMMUNITY YMCA INC: $147,615 · OtherTOM A FINCH COMMUNITY YMCA INCTHOMASVILLE CITY SCHOOLS: $136,637 · OtherTHOMASVILLE CITY SCHOOLSCOOPERATIVE COMMUNITY MINISTRY: $123,509 · OtherCOOPERATIVE COMMUNITY MINISTRYNOVANT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $95,000 · OtherNOVANT HEALTH FOUNDATIONMEMORIAL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $85,473 · OtherMEMORIAL UNITED METHODIST CHURCHHPT4LIFE CORP: $65,000 · OtherHPT4LIFE CORPSAINTSING ATHLETICS: $33,905 · Other+7 more: $79,700 · Other+7 moreDUKE UNIVERSITY: $25,789 · EducationGUILFORD COLLEGE: $5,000 · EducationGreensboro College: $5,000 · EducationPIEDMONT LAND CONSERVANCY: $15,000 · Environment
Other$766,839Education$35,789Environment$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTOM A FINCH COMMUNITY YMCA INC: $147,615 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetHPT4LIFE CORP: $65,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $25,789 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPIEDMONT LAND CONSERVANCY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGUILFORD COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGreensboro College: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF DAVIDSON COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TOM A FINCH COMMUNITY YMCA INC ↗
  • Who funds HPT4LIFE CORP ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PIEDMONT LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds GUILFORD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Greensboro College ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF DAVIDSON COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the CarolinasNC12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brown F Finch Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brown F Finch Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Brown F Finch’s filings →

    More from the funding graph