Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Brown Chls & Hln Memorial F Ta

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$308k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Arts & Culture$436kCrime & Legal$195kEducation$159kHousing & Shelter$150kEnvironment$125kHealth$121kCommunity Improvement$118kFood & Nutrition$115kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $210k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$75,000
CLEVELAND PUBLIC THEATRE$30,000
HOUSING RESEARCH ADVOCACY CENTER$25,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO$20,000
LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND$20,000
COURT COMMUNITY SERVICE$20,000
GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK$15,000
CLEVELAND RESTORATION SOCIETY$10,000
THE CITY CLUB OF CLEVELAND$10,000
POLICY MATTERS OHIO$10,000
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$10,000
INSTITUTE FOR ENERGY ECONOMICS AND FINAN$10,000
MAY DUGAN CENTER$10,000
HFLA$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE FRIENDSHIP FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%FRIENDLY INN SETTLEMENT: $3k → 17%MAY DUGAN CENTER: $20k → 17%MAY DUGAN CENTER: $14k → 17%MAY DUGAN CENTER: $10k → 17%MAY DUGAN CENTER: $10k → 17%ORGANIZE OHIO: $5k → 17%MAY DUGAN CENTER: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 34 repeat orgs$218k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

34 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
36

Total granted

$1.9M
$218k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
0%

Still filing today

65%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEducationCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CLEVELAND PUBLIC THEATRE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $125k · revenue +173%
  • CC
    COURT COMMUNITY SERVICE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $100k · revenue +18%
  • GC
    GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $95k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • FB
    FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • PA
    Polish American Cultural Center
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • CS
    Cleveland State University History & Digital Humanities
    one grant, 2019 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Cleveland

Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.

Human Services
2
West Creek Conservancy

Our mission is to enrich the lives of all people in northeast ohio by conserving natural habitats, restoring the ecological value of our region's lands and waters, and expanding opportunities to connect people from all cultures to…

Environment
3
Cleveland Mediation Center

Our mission is to promote a just and peaceful community by honoring all people, building their capacity to act, and facilitating opportunities for them to engage in conflict constructively. We continue to fulfill our mission by…

Crime & Legal
4
Neighborhood Progress Inc

Cleveland neighborhood progress is committed to advancing its mission of fostering communities of choice and opportunity. our vision is for all of cleveland's neighborhoods to be attractive, vibrant communities where people from all…

Community Improvement
5
Literary Cleveland

Literary Cleveland assists writers and readers at all stages of development, promotes new and existing literature of the highest quality, and advances Northeast Ohio as a vital center of diverse voices and visions.

Education
6
Cleveland Museum of Art

The mission of the cleveland museum of art (cma) is to fulfill its dual roles as one of the world's most distinguished comprehensive art museums and as one of northeastern ohio's principal civic and cultural institutions. the museum,…

Arts & Culture
7
Cleveland Public Market Corporation

Cleveland public market corporations mission is to preserve the city's public market tradition while making the local food system more accessible, equitable, and diverse.

Community Improvement
8
Cincinnati Development Fund

To strengthen underserved neighborhoods and improve lives through innovative financing.

Housing & Shelter
9
City Fields

To operate as a community development corporation with the goal to transform disadvantaged neighborhoods through five primary areas: physical revitalization, social revitalization, economic development, neighborhood safety, and leadership…

Community Improvement
10
Ohio Capital Finance Corporation

Ohio capital finance corporation provides flexible financing products and utilizes partnerships for the expansion and preservation of afforable housing to advance community development while ensuring that all residents regardless of income…

Community Improvement
11
The Land Cle

The Land is a local news startup that reports on Clevelands neighborhoods and inner ring suburbs. We deliver in-depth stories that foster accountability, inform the community, and inspire people to take action.

Arts & Culture
12
Cleveland Development Foundation

Developing and improving Cleveland Ohio's civic visions.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ohio City Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Friendship Foundation of American V. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyProfessional Trade Associat…Youth Leadership DevelopmentJewish Community FoundationsHealthcare Support Organiza…Classical & Jazz Music Orga…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr13%2%5–10yr16%7%10–20yr16%37%20–35yr18%34%35–55yr18%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr16%2%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr18%50%35–55yr18%22%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/44
the rest of the field
13%
1,718/13,018

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/40
Grantees still filing
25/40
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $315,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOURT COMMUNITY SERVICE — $100,000 · OtherCOURT COMMUNITY SERVICELEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND — $95,000 · OtherLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CLEVELANDHOUSING RESEARCH AND ADVOCACY CENTER — $85,000 · OtherHOUSING RESEARCH AND ADVOCACY CENTERPOLISH AMERICAN CULTURAL CENTER — $68,000 · OtherCLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY — $60,000 · OtherHFLA — $55,000 · OtherNear Westside MultiService Corp — $56,000 · OtherGREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $50,000 · Other+40 more — $394,000 · Other+40 moreCLEVELAND PUBLIC THEATRE INC — $125,000 · Arts & CultureCLEVELAND PUBLIC…CLEVELAND RESTORATION SOCIETY INC — $90,000 · Arts & CultureCLEVELAND RESTOR…NEAR WEST THEATRE INC — $33,000 · Arts & CultureNEAR WEST THEATR…BROADWAY SCHOOL OF MUSIC & THE ARTS — $27,000 · Arts & CultureBROADWAY SCHOOL …WESTERN RESERVE HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $15,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $18,000 · Arts & Culture+3 moreNORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOODS CDC — $107,000 · Community ImprovementSLAVIC VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT — $8,300 · Community Improvement+1 more — $2,800 · Community ImprovementPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO — $80,000 · HealthNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CARE INC — $30,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $5,000 · Health+1 more — $1,000 · HealthTHE CITY CLUB OF CLEVELAND — $70,000 · EducationOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $30,000 · EducationEDWINS LEADERSHIP & RESTAURANT INSTITUTE — $5,000 · EducationGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC — $95,000 · Food & NutritionWESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY — $60,000 · EnvironmentINSTITUTE FOR ENERGY ECONOMICS AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS INC — $20,000 · Environment
Other$1,278,000Arts & Culture$308,000Community Improvement$118,100Health$116,000Education$105,000Food & Nutrition$95,000Environment$80,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCLEVELAND PUBLIC THEATRE INC — $125,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetNORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOODS CDC — $107,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetCOURT COMMUNITY SERVICE — $100,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC — $95,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND — $95,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCLEVELAND RESTORATION SOCIETY INC — $90,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetHOUSING RESEARCH AND ADVOCACY CENTER — $85,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO — $80,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CITY CLUB OF CLEVELAND — $70,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetWESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY — $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNear Westside MultiService Corp — $56,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $50,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPOLICY MATTERS OHIO — $40,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetNEAR WEST THEATRE INC — $33,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CARE INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBROADWAY SCHOOL OF MUSIC & THE ARTS — $27,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetIDEASTREAM — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR ENERGY ECONOMICS AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGMILUTH CHASODIM (THE HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION) — $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetWESTERN RESERVE HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONCERNED CITIZENS COMMUNITY COUNCIL — $13,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetLUTHERAN METROPOLITAN MINISTRY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetIRISH AMERICAN ARCHIVES SOCIETY — $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetSLAVIC VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT — $8,300 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMANUFACTURING WORKS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRICHFIELD HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $5,000 over 1y, 39% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDWINS LEADERSHIP & RESTAURANT INSTITUTE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRIVERSIDE CEMETERY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 73% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLEVELAND ARTS PRIZE — $3,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetFRIENDLY INN SETTLEMENT INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOHIO CITY INCORPORATED — $2,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLEVELAND PUBLIC THEATRE INC
  • Who funds NORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOODS CDC
  • Who funds COURT COMMUNITY SERVICE
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND
  • Who funds CLEVELAND RESTORATION SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds HOUSING RESEARCH AND ADVOCACY CENTER
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO
  • Who funds THE CITY CLUB OF CLEVELAND
  • Who funds WESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds Near Westside MultiService Corp
  • Who funds GREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
  • Who funds POLICY MATTERS OHIO
  • Who funds NEAR WEST THEATRE INC
  • Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CARE INC
  • Who funds BROADWAY SCHOOL OF MUSIC & THE ARTS
  • Who funds IDEASTREAM
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR ENERGY ECONOMICS AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS INC
  • Who funds GMILUTH CHASODIM (THE HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION)
  • Who funds WESTERN RESERVE HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds CONCERNED CITIZENS COMMUNITY COUNCIL
  • Who funds LUTHERAN METROPOLITAN MINISTRY
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
  • Who funds IRISH AMERICAN ARCHIVES SOCIETY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland FoundationOH46.6× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The George Gund Foundation · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · Third Federal Foundation · The Abington Foundation · Sisters of Charity Foundation of Cleveland · Mt Sinai Health Care Foundation · Saint Lukes Foundation of Cleveland Ohio · Dollar Bank Foundation · Murphy Family Foundation · Jack Joseph & Morton Mandel Foundation · The Reinberger Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Brown Chls & Hln Memorial F Ta funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph