Skip to content

· Private foundation

Brown Assistance Fund Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$50kEducation$49kReligion$42kHuman Services$32kArts & Culture$22kYouth Development$17kFood & Nutrition$17kPublic Safety & Disaster$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$720k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL$2,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF SPOKANE$2,000
SHRINER'S HOSPITAL$2,000
SECOND BAPTIST SCHOOL$1,000
MEALS ON WHEELS SPOKANE VALLEY$1,000
THE ARTISANS ARK$1,000
PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF THE ROSES$1,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF INLAND NW$1,000
SAN FRANCISCO LIGHTHOUSE$1,000
LINACRE INC$1,000
THE RIVER FOOD PANTRY$1,000
ADVENT EPISCOPAL DAY SCHOOL INC$1,000
BELMONT UNIVERSITY$1,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF INLAND NORTHWEST$1,000
GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $1k → 9%NEHEMIAH CENTER INC: $4k → 16%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $1k → 9%NEHEMIAH CENTER INC: $4k → 16%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $1k → 9%NEHEMIAH CENTER INC: $3k → 16%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $1k → 9%NEHEMIAH CENTER INC: $3k → 16%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $1k → 9%NEHEMIAH CENTER INC: $2k → 16%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $1k → 9%NEHEMIAH CENTER INC: $2k → 16%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $1k → 9%NEHEMIAH CENTER INC: $1k → 16%CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $800 → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $1k → 9%NEHEMIAH CENTER INC: $1k → 16%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $1k → 9%NEHEMIAH CENTER INC: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
WI
NY
CA
TN
NC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$278k · 55 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

55 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
5

Total granted

$278k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+141%

Still filing today

40%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthAnimalsArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    Nehemiah Center Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +10%
  • MS
    MADISON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $12k · revenue +41%
  • GE
    GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • BC
    Baylor College of Medicinegraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +32%
  • PS
    PEGGY SMITH ENDOWMENT FOR
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • P(
    PRES (PRESBYTERIAN) HOUSE
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Spokane Regional Sports Commission

Economic and community development through sport tourism. bid to host and create major sporting events, and facility consultation and optimization.

—
2
Spruce Street School

Spruce Street School is a nurturing educational community that instills in a broad range of children the social, emotional, and intellectual skills for lifelong participation in a diverse society. We offer kindergarten through fifth grade…

Education
3
Larche Spokane

To make known the gifts of people with development disabilities, revealed through mutually transforming relationships, to foster an environment in community that responds to the changing needs of members while being faithful to the core…

Human Services
4
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

—
5
Community Health Association of Spokane

The mission of the Community Health Association of Spokane (CHAS Health) is to improve the overall health of the communities we serve by expanding access to quality health and wellness services.

Health
6
Breck School

We create confident learners who lead lives of intellectual curiosity, self-knowledge, and social responsibility.

Education
7
Innovation Spokane Schools

To prepare a diverse range of students for a life of learning in post-secondary education, citizenship, and leadership.

Education
8
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
9
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

—
10
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
11
Legacy Meridian Park Hospital

Legacy Meridian Park Hospital (LMPH), established in 1973, is a community hospital in Tualatin, OR, south of Portland with 150 licensed beds. LMPH serves the needs of the fast growing communities of Tualatin, Tigard, Wilsonville, Sherwood,…

Health
12
Seattle Children's Healthcare System

Seattle children's healthcare system (schs) is engaged in activities relating to the provision of health care services to infants, children, and adolescents, delivering and improving the delivery and the quality of those services through…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Skils'kin; the most unlike its peers is Carrousel Players of the Coeur D'alene Summer Theatre Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
23/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST GEORGE'S SCHOOL INC: $17,000 · OtherST GEORGE'S SCHOOL INCVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA SPOKANE: $12,000 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA SPOKANEFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $10,500 · OtherOUR LADY OF FATIMA CHURCH: $9,800 · OtherPRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF THE ROSES: $9,250 · OtherEARL BAUM CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $9,100 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS SPOKANE VALLEY: $7,200 · OtherSHRINER'S HOSPITAL - SPOKANE: $7,150 · Other+37 more: $117,250 · Other+37 moreNehemiah Center Inc: $20,250 · Human ServicesNehemiah Center …GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $9,400 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES FOR…GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS FOR T…HOSPICE OF SPOKANE: $3,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF SPOKA…+1 more: $800 · Human ServicesMADISON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $12,000 · Arts & CultureADVENT EPISCOPAL DAY SCHOOL INC: $3,000 · EducationSPOKANE HEARING ORAL PROGRAM OF EXCELLENCE HOPE: $3,000 · EducationVanderbilt University: $2,200 · EducationBelmont University: $2,000 · EducationBaylor College of Medicine: $1,000 · EducationLILAC SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $7,250 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $2,000 · HealthFOUNDATION FOR TEEN HEALTH: $1,000 · HealthSpokane Humane Society: $7,250 · AnimalsKOOTENAI HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $400 · AnimalsBRIARPATCH YOUTH SERVICES INC: $7,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$199,250Human Services$41,450Arts & Culture$12,000Education$11,200Health$10,250Animals$7,650Crime & Legal$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNehemiah Center Inc: $20,250 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetMADISON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $12,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $9,400 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLILAC SERVICES FOR THE BLIND: $7,250 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetSpokane Humane Society: $7,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBRIARPATCH YOUTH SERVICES INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSpokane Parks Foundation: $6,450 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ARTISANS' ARK: $5,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RIVER FOOD PANTRY INC: $4,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCARROUSEL PLAYERS OF THE COEUR D'ALENE SUMMER THEATRE INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANE COUNTY INC: $3,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetInnovia Foundation: $3,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF SPOKANE: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetADVENT EPISCOPAL DAY SCHOOL INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPOKANE HEARING ORAL PROGRAM OF EXCELLENCE HOPE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSpokane Guilds' School & Neuromuscular Center: $2,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University: $2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSKILS'KIN: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBelmont University: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLINACRE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $1,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR TEEN HEALTH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKOOTENAI HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Nehemiah Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds MADISON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds LILAC SERVICES FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds Spokane Humane Society ↗
  • Who funds BRIARPATCH YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Spokane Parks Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE ARTISANS' ARK ↗
  • Who funds THE RIVER FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds CARROUSEL PLAYERS OF THE COEUR D'ALENE SUMMER THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Innovia Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF SPOKANE ↗
  • Who funds ADVENT EPISCOPAL DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds SPOKANE HEARING ORAL PROGRAM OF EXCELLENCE HOPE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Innovia FoundationWA23.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Innovia Foundation · The Avista Foundation · The Is & Emily Fetterman Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brown Assistance Fund Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brown Assistance Fund Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Brown Assistance’s filings →

More from the funding graph