· Public charity
Brooklyn Arts Council Inc
To enrich the quality of life of the residents of brooklyn through the promotion of the arts in the community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 22 grants below total $270,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,190,669 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $920,669 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $233k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BAILEY'S CAFE INC | $26,000 |
| GRAND PISTACHIO ARTS CORPORATION | $20,000 |
| PARLE ENDEAVORS INC | $20,000 |
| BROOKLYN YOUTH COMPANY INC | $17,000 |
| CHAMBERQUEER INC | $15,000 |
| ONE WHALE'S TALE LLC | $15,000 |
| WHITE BIRD PRODUCTIONS INC | $15,000 |
| BROOKLYN FAM FESTIVAL OF ARTS AND MUSIC INC | $15,000 |
| DOMINICANS LOVE HAITIANS MOVEMENT INC | $10,000 |
| RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK | $10,000 |
| NATIONAL QUEER THEATER | $10,000 |
| POWRPLNT INC | $10,000 |
| FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC | $10,000 |
| THE THELMA HILL PERFORMING ARTS CENTER | $10,000 |
| BUSHWICK WORKSHOP SPACE | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +71% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $164k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RMRAGA MASSIVE INC6× · 2017–2023 · $67k · revenue +6%
- BCBAILEY'S CAFE INC5× · 2020–2025 · $64k · revenue +8%
- BYBROOKLYN YOUTH COMPANY INC3× · 2022–2025 · $47k · revenue +40% · 49% of their budget
Funded once
- MDMCKOY DANCE PROJECT INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $19k · revenue +35% · 39% of their budget
- TATHE AFROLATIN PROJECT INCone grant, 2022 · $12k
- BRBAY RIDGE STOREFRONT ART WALK INCone grant, 2017 · $12k · 62% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Production of original theater at its Brooklyn, NY space.
The Tank is a small, Manhattan-based non-profit arts presenter and producer serving emerging artists. Our goal is to remove economic barriers from the creation of new work for artists launching their careers or experimenting within their…
Cultural-educational, via multi-discipline arts hosting for the general public, and technical support for arts professionals.
New Dance Alliance is a performing arts nonprofit. Our mission, from the earliest days, has been to support experimental movement-based artists. In recent years, we have shifted our focus, making an explicit commitment to equity and…
Cultural and educational performances
Cultural and educational performances
A Contemporary Dance Company Based in New York City
Nia theatrical production company inc. is dedicatedto educating young artist and bringing arts program to underserved communities in nyc.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Council On the Arts and Humanities for Staten Island Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Regina Opera Company Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 13. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 11% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 7% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
75 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 75 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RAGA MASSIVE INC ↗
- Who funds BAILEY'S CAFE INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN YOUTH COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
- Who funds CONTINUUM CULTURE & ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds OYE GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN FAM FESTIVAL OF ARTS AND MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds SOMETHING POSITIVE INC ↗
- Who funds AFROLATINO FORUM ↗
- Who funds GRAND PISTACHIO ARTS CORP ↗
- Who funds National Queer Theater ↗
- Who funds Redhawk Indian Arts Council Inc ↗
- Who funds PARLE ENDEAVORS INC ↗
- Who funds Yaa Samar Dance Theatre ↗
- Who funds DANCING CRANE INC ↗
- Who funds MCKOY DANCE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds L'ATELIER THEATRE NY INC ↗
- Who funds ESSENCE THEATRE-STUDIO INC ↗
- Who funds WENDYS SUBWAY INC ↗
- Who funds WHITE BIRD PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds ChamberQUEER Inc ↗
- Who funds ACADEMY OF MEDICAL & PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES INC DBA RaisingHealth Partners ↗
- Who funds THE AFROLATIN PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Arts Gowanus Inc ↗
- Who funds BAY RIDGE STOREFRONT ART WALK INC ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN PEACH ARTS COALITION ↗
- Who funds BUILDING BEATS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds WOVEN SPACES INC ↗
- Who funds BUSHWICK WORKSHOP SPACE INC ↗
- Who funds FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds THE THELMA HILL PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ASASE YAA CULTURAL ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Alliance of Resident Theatres New York Inc · The Howard Gilman Foundation Inc · In Our Backyards Inc · Brooklyn Community Foundation · Dance Service New York City Inc · The Harkness Foundation for Dance Inc · Mid Atlantic Arts Inc · Mertz Gilmore Foundation · The Ford Foundation · City Parks Foundation Inc · The Map Fund Inc · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Brooklyn Arts Council Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.