Skip to content

· Private foundation

Brian and Lorene Furrer Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$248k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0173% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$214kInternational$123kReligion$113kPhilanthropy$61kArts & Culture$33kCommunity Improvement$23kRecreation & Sports$20kFood & Nutrition$19kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $150k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$241k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
APOSTOLIC CHRISTIAN HARVEST CALL$50,000
LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS$50,000
PURDUE FOUNDATION$50,000
CORNERSTONE PRIVATE SCHOOL$10,000
WLACC$10,000
WHITE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATOIN$10,000
LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS$10,000
LOVING SHEPHERD MINISTRIES$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
AGRIINSTITUTE - AGRICULTURAL LEADER$6,500
LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$5,000
MONON CIVIC CENTER$5,000
AICM$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
NATIONAL FFA FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AICM: $5k → 26%GLOBAL DISCIPLES: $6k → 9%RIPE FOR HARVEST WORLD OUTREACH: $2k → 12%OPEN THE BOOKS: $3k → 9%MITCH DANIELS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $25k → 5%INDIANA FFA FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%LOVING SHEPHERD MINISTRIES: $10k → 9%WHITE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATOIN: $10k → 9%SACRED HEART CATHLIC CHURCH: $10k → 9%RAMSEY PYROTECHNICS INC: $3k → 11%GATEWAY WOODS FAMILY SERVICES: $14k → 12%CAMPUS OUTREACH: $5k → 16%LIFEWISE ACEDEMY: $10k → 15%LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS: $50k → 11%LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $5k → 7%TEAM EXPANSION: $15k → 15%AGRIINSTITUTE - AGRICULTURAL LEADER: $7k → 5%INDIANA FFA FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%WHITE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATOIN: $10k → 9%JERRY COOK SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $5k → 9%GATEWAY WOODS FAMILY SERVICES: $4k → 12%NATIONAL FFA FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%APOSTOLIC CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $10k → 19%LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS: $50k → 11%TEAM EXPANSION: $5k → 15%MIKE CUMMINS: $3k → 9%NATIONAL FFA FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%BATTLEGROUND AERO CHURCH INC: $9k → 19%LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS: $10k → 11%BATTLEGROUND AERO CHURCH INC: $7k → 19%LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS: $10k → 11%PURDUE FOUNDATION: $50k → 19%LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS: $3k → 11%PURDUE FOUNDATION: $50k → 19%PURDUE FOUNDATION: $23k → 19%PURDUE FOUNDATION: $23k → 19%PURDUE FOUNDATION: $15k → 19%PURDUE FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $10k → 19%PURDUE FOUNDATION: $9k → 19%PURDUE FOUNDATION: $9k → 19%BATTLEGROUND AERO CHURCH INC: $7k → 9%CORNERSTONE PRIVATE SCHOOL: $10k → 9%CORNERSTONE PRIVATE SCHOOL: $10k → 9%CORNERSTONE PRIVATE SCHOOL: $10k → 9%CORNERSTONE PRIVATE SCHOOL: $10k → 9%WOLCOTT COMMUNITY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $3k → 9%APOSTOLIC CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $3k → 9%MONON CIVIC CENTER: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
KY
VA
AZ
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$607k · 21 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
23

Total granted

$607k
$81k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
-1%

Still filing today

38%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyInternationalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC
    4× · 2018–2024 · $123k · revenue +139%
  • CP
    CORNERSTONE PRIVATE SCHOOL INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +43%
  • BA
    BATTLEGROUND AERO CHURCH INC
    3× · 2018–2021 · $23k · revenue +66% · 100% of their budget

Funded once

  • MD
    MITCH DANIELS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -23%
  • Purdue Research Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -4%
  • SH
    SACRED HEART CATHLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
2
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
3
Indiana Agribusiness Council Inc

An agribusiness network advocate, representing members' interests within all levels of government and keeping members informed of the latest industry trends and news.

—
4
Iba Foundation Inc

To provide education programs to members of the banking industry, those aspiring to develop their capabilities in the business of banking, and instructing the public regarding banking.

Education
5
Indiana Association of Realtors Inc

To serve its members and local associations by providing leadership programs and services to sustain a healthy real estate market in indiana. in providing these services, the association will raise the standards of the real estate…

—
6
Independent Insurance Agents of Indiana

To enhance the competitive position and fulfill business requirements of independent agents and brokers, advocating buyer interest, and continually striving to be the premier trade association.

—
7
Illinois Agricultural Leadership Foundation

To develop knowledgeable and effective leaders to become policy and decision makers for the agricultural industry.

Public Benefit
8
Indiana University Foundation

The Indiana University Foundation (IUF) maximizes private philanthropic support for Indiana University by fostering lifelong relationships with key stakeholders and providing advancement leadership and fundraising services for (Continued…

Education
9
Enroll Indy Inc

Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…

Education
10
Indiana Association of United Ways Inc

Indiana united way is the leading voice to advocate, engage, and partner with a strong united way network and key stakeholders to advance human well-being throughout indiana.

Philanthropy
11
Indiana University Alumni Association Inc

The indiana university alumni association activates and supports the global alumni network- encouraging alumni to grow a lifelong connection with indiana university, and inspiring their ongoing generosity toward each other and the…

—
12
International School of Indiana Inc

The mission of the international school of indiana is to provide our students with a world-class education that prepares them to be responsible citizens and effective leaders in a rapidly globalizing and interdependent world.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Ffa Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Battleground Aero Church Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PURDUE FOUNDATION: $177,885 · OtherPURDUE FOUNDATIONAPOSTOLIC CHRISTIAN HARVESTCALL: $101,000 · OtherAPOSTOLIC CHRISTIAN HARVESTCALLTEAM EXPANSION MINISTRIES INC: $20,000 · OtherWLACC: $20,000 · OtherWHITE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATOIN: $20,000 · Other+38 more: $127,140 · Other+38 moreLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $122,900 · InternationalLIFESONG FOR ORPHAN…CORNERSTONE PRIVATE SCHOOL INC: $40,393 · EducationPurdue Research Foundation: $10,000 · EducationGATEWAY WOODS FAMILY SERVICES INC: $18,301 · Youth DevelopmentNational FFA Foundation Inc: $8,500 · Youth DevelopmentINDIANA FFA FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentMITCH DANIELS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $250 · PhilanthropyBATTLEGROUND AERO CHURCH INC: $22,900 · ReligionGLOBAL DISCIPLES: $5,500 · Arts & CultureIndiana Repertory Theatre Inc: $4,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$466,025International$122,900Education$50,393Youth Development$32,801Philanthropy$25,250Religion$22,900Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $122,900 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCORNERSTONE PRIVATE SCHOOL INC: $40,393 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetMITCH DANIELS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetBATTLEGROUND AERO CHURCH INC: $22,900 over 3y, 100% of budgetGATEWAY WOODS FAMILY SERVICES INC: $18,301 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPurdue Research Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAGRIINSTITUTE INC: $8,750 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetNational FFA Foundation Inc: $8,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA FFA FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL DISCIPLES: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLeadership Institute: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIndiana Repertory Theatre Inc: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASHES TO GLORY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HONEYWELL FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE PRIVATE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds MITCH DANIELS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BATTLEGROUND AERO CHURCH INC ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY WOODS FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Purdue Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AGRIINSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds National FFA Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA FFA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL DISCIPLES ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds Indiana Repertory Theatre Inc ↗
  • Who funds ASHES TO GLORY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncIN14.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brian and Lorene Furrer Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brian and Lorene Furrer Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Brian and Lorene Furrer Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Brian and Lorene Furrer Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Brian and Lorene Furrer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph