Skip to content

· Private foundation

Brewer Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$48kHealth$35kHuman Services$29kFood & Nutrition$11kYouth Development$8kAnimals$6kArts & Culture$4kCrime & Legal$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ZACH MUCKLEROY TCU SCHOLARSHIP$5,000
UTA$5,000
TARRANT AREA FOOD BANK$4,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$4,000
ANIMAL ADVOCATES OF NORTH TEXAS$3,000
THIRD ACT EDUCATION FUND$2,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$2,000
GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION$2,000
CASA OF TARRANT COUNTY$2,000
THE GATEHOUSE$2,000
BROTHERSKEEPERS$2,000
LARRY'S KIDS$2,000
SAFE HAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $2k → 11%GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $1k → 11%GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $500 → 11%MEALS ON WHEELS: $4k → 11%MEALS ON WHEELS: $1k → 11%MEALS ON WHEELS: $500 → 11%LARRY'S KIDS: $2k → 11%SAFE HAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $1k → 11%SAFE HAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $1k → 11%SAFE HAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $500 → 11%LENA POPE HOME INC: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$133k · 25 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
14

Total granted

$133k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+399%

Still filing today

60%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RG
    RHYANS GOOD DAY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $24k · revenue +207% · 64% of their budget
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS
    3× · 2023–2025 · $6k · revenue +10%
  • AA
    ANIMAL ADVOCATES OF NORTH TEXAS
    4× · 2022–2025 · $6k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • AA
    AIRPORT AREA YMCA FOR METROPOLITAN FORT WORTH
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • TS
    TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $750
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
2
Dup 15Q Alliance

Dup15q alliance empowers individuals living with dup15q syndrome and other related rare diseases to reach their full potential by advancing breakthrough research and life-changing therapeutic treatments, supporting families affected by…

Health
3
The Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration

Promote and fund research into developing better diagnostic processes, therapies, and cures for frontotemporal degeneration (ftd); provide information, education, support and advocacy to persons diagnosed with ftd, their families and…

Health
4
Brightfocus Foundation

Brightfocus foundation funds exceptional research worldwide to defeat alzheimer's disease, macular degeneration, and glaucoma and provides expert information on these heartbreaking diseases. please refer to schedule o for a complete…

Health
5
Youth and Family Alliance

Youth and family alliance (dba lifeworks) is a fearless advocate for youth and young adults pursuing a life they love and a stable future for themselves and their families. we strive to break cycles of instability by providing support and…

Human Services
6
Friedreich's Ataxia Research Alliance

To marshal and focus the resources and relationships needed to cure fa by raising funds for research, promoting public awareness and aligning scientists, patients, clinicians, government agencies and pharmaceutical companies dedicated to…

Health
7
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
8
Any Baby Can of San Antonio Inc

The mission of any baby can is to serve families of children and youth facing serious health or developmental challenges. barriers of income and location are addressed by providing all services at no cost to the families and at a location…

Human Services
9
Down Syndrome Assn of Central Texas

The mission of the down syndrome association of central texas (dsact)is to provide education, support, and resources to individuals with down syndrome, their families, professionals, and the community while building public awareness and…

—
10
Lifegift Organ Donation Center

The mission of lifegift is to provide community benefit by ethically, effectively and efficiently recovering appropriately transplantable organs and tissue to give the gift of life. lifegift also provides public and professional education…

Health
11
Easter Seals North Texas

We help advance the independence of individuals with disabilities & other special needs.

Health
12
Childsafe Colorado Inc

Mission: our mission is to break the cycle and heal the childhood trauma resulting from abuse and neglect with specialized treatment, education and community outreach. we believe in a comprehensive, community-based approach to the problem…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tarrant Area Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Planned Parenthood. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
10/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UTA: $15,000 · OtherUTAZACH MUCKLEROY TCU SCHOLARSHIP: $15,000 · OtherZACH MUCKLEROY TCU SCHOLARSHIPRYAN SIDDIQUE SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $12,405 · OtherRYAN SIDDIQUE SCHOLARSHIP FUNDTarrant Area Food Bank: $5,500 · OtherTarrant Area Food BankUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON: $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTONTHE WARM PLACE: $5,000 · OtherTHE WARM PLACETHE GATEHOUSE CORPORATION: $4,500 · OtherTHE GATEHOUSE CORPORATIONIndividual grant recipient: $3,500 · Other+17 more: $13,746 · Other+17 moreRHYANS GOOD DAY FOUNDATION: $24,099 · EducationRHYANS GOOD DAY FO…+1 more: $365 · EducationMEALS ON WHEELS: $5,500 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHE…THE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $3,500 · Human ServicesTHE GLADNEY …SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $2,500 · Human ServicesSAFEHAVEN OF…LARRY'S KIDS: $2,000 · Human ServicesLARRY'S KIDSLENA POPE HOME INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesLENA POPE HO…PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $6,400 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $2,103 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $1,500 · Health+2 more: $500 · HealthANIMAL ADVOCATES OF NORTH TEXAS: $5,500 · AnimalsJACKS BROTHERS KEEPERS: $5,000 · PhilanthropyCASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $3,500 · Civil RightsTHIRD ACT EDUCATION FUND INC: $2,000 · Environment
Other$79,651Education$24,464Human Services$15,500Health$10,503Animals$5,500Philanthropy$5,000Civil Rights$3,500Environment$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRHYANS GOOD DAY FOUNDATION: $24,099 over 3y, 64% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $6,400 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $5,500 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetANIMAL ADVOCATES OF NORTH TEXAS: $5,500 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJACKS BROTHERS KEEPERS: $5,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetTHE GATEHOUSE CORPORATION: $4,500 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetTHE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LADDER ALLIANCE: $2,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $2,103 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLENA POPE HOME INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLondon ISD Athletic Booster Club: $365 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RHYANS GOOD DAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL ADVOCATES OF NORTH TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds JACKS BROTHERS KEEPERS ↗
  • Who funds THE GATEHOUSE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds THE LADDER ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds LARRY'S KIDS ↗
  • Who funds LENA POPE HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds THIRD ACT EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds London ISD Athletic Booster Club ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

R4 FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: R4 Foundation · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brewer Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brewer Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Brewer Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph