Skip to content

· Private foundation

Brethren Community Foundation Inc

FOCUS ON GIVING TO BENEFIT SENIOR & YOUTH IN TWO METHODS; INDIV GRANTS & PROGRAMMATIC GRANTS TO NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS & SCHOOLS WHO SERVICE TARGET AUDIENCES.

$617k
Granted FY2020
24
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$150k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Brethren Community Foundation Inc’s FY2021 grant dollars went to Orange County Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Brethren Community Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 14 organizations, $617k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

14
’17
17
’18
17
’19
14
’20
0
’21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Philanthropy$18MEducation$944kYouth Development$594kHealth$540kInternational$396kHuman Services$192kEmployment$50kHousing & Shelter$25kOther$0
02FY2020 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k8 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $213k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $358k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$150,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PHILADELPHIA$147,500
GLOBAL PARTNERS FOR DEVELOPMENT$60,000
IMPROVE YOUR TOMORROW$25,000
WISEPLACE SHELTER FOR WOMEN$25,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF FONTANA$25,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF FULLERTON$22,500
KIDWORKS COMMUNITY DEVELEOPMENT CENTER$20,000
OLIVE CREST$15,000
URBAN YOUTH WORKERS INSTITUTE$15,000
PRENTICE SCHOOL$15,000
HART COMMUNITY HOMES$10,000
MY DAY COUNTS$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CENTRAL OC$10,000
PRECIOUS LAMB PRESCHOOL INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HART COMMUNITY HOMES: $10k → 10%HART COMMUNITY HOMES: $10k → 10%HART COMMUNITY HOMES: $10k → 10%HART COMMUNITY HOMES: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 30 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2020, 6 since wound down. Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
6

Total granted

$2.7M
$43k

Still filing today

57%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Youth DevelopmentEducationHealthInternationalReligionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PHILADELPHIA INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $122k · revenue +53%
  • IY
    IMPROVE YOUR TOMORROW INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $90k · revenue ×18
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF FULLERTON INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $73k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • KC
    KIWANIS CLUB OF GREATER JAMUL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LA HARBOR
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • MU
    MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys and Girls Club of Tracy

The boys & girls club of tracy's mission is to enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development
2
The Boys & Girls Clubs Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those most in need of our services, to realize and develop their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens in a global society.

—
3
The Antelope Valley Boys and Girls Club

The Antelope Valley Boys and Girls Club mission is to enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development
4
Boys & Girls Club of San Fernando Valley

Boys and girls clubs provide a safe place for youth to develop character, leadership, education, career guidance, health, art, sports and fitness while becoming responsible and caring citizens.

—
5
Boys and Girls Club of Fremont County Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
6
Boys & Girls Clubs of Bandera County

Enable young people, especially those from disadvantaged circumstances to realize their full potential as productive, responsible & caring citizens.

Recreation & Sports
7
Boys & Girls Clubs of El Paso

To enable young people, especially those that need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible adults

—
8
Boys and Girls Club of Hollywood Inc

Boys and girls club of hollywood provides educational programs in diverse subjects that are focused on providing structured learning to the children of our community.

Youth Development
9
Youth Policy Institute Inc

Youth policy institute (ypi) transforms los angeles neighborhoods, reducing poverty by offering cradle to college & career services.

—
10
Boys & Girls Club of the Coastside

To enable all young people, especially those who need it the most to reach their full potential as productive and responsible citizens. the organization achieves its mission through educational programs, enrichment activities and organized…

Youth Development
11
Community Youth Center of San Francisco

Our mission is to encourage a diverse population of high-need young people to explore their full potential through academic, career, family, and community life. Every year, CYC impacts over 8,000 San Francisco youth and their families,…

—
12
Boys & Girls Clubs of Fresno Inc

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens. This is accomplished through activities provided for the children to participate in.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olive Crest; the most unlike its peers is Whittier College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $17,993,179 · PhilanthropyORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $500,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PHILADELPHIA: $480,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CENTRAL OC: $100,000 · OtherWISEPLACE SHELTER FOR WOMEN: $82,620 · OtherKIDWORKS COMMUNITY DEVELEOPMENT CENTER: $75,000 · Other+16 more: $346,925 · OtherGlobal Partners For Development: $395,900 · InternationalBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PHILADELPHIA INC: $122,000 · Youth DevelopmentIMPROVE YOUR TOMORROW INC: $90,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF FULLERTON INC: $72,500 · Youth DevelopmentFREEDOM 4 U: $37,400 · Youth DevelopmentDIY GIRLS: $17,500 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LONG BEACH: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentWhittier College: $175,300 · EducationThe Prentice School: $65,000 · EducationPRECIOUS LAMB PRESCHOOL INC: $35,000 · EducationOLIVE CREST: $50,000 · HealthDIGNITY GROUP: $25,000 · HealthHISPANIC MINISTRY CENTER: $55,000 · ReligionHART COMMUNITY HOMES INC: $36,000 · Human Services
Philanthropy$17,993,179Other$1,584,545International$395,900Youth Development$369,400Education$275,300Health$75,000Religion$55,000Human Services$36,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $17,993,179 over 1y, 16% of budgetGlobal Partners For Development: $395,900 over 3y, 15% of budgetWhittier College: $175,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PHILADELPHIA INC: $122,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetIMPROVE YOUR TOMORROW INC: $90,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF FULLERTON INC: $72,500 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetThe Prentice School: $65,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetHISPANIC MINISTRY CENTER: $55,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetOLIVE CREST: $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF FONTANA: $50,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetORANGE COUNTY ADULT ACHIEVEMENT CENTER DBA MY DAY COUNTS: $50,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFREEDOM 4 U: $37,400 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetHART COMMUNITY HOMES INC: $36,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetPRECIOUS LAMB PRESCHOOL INC: $35,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetDIGNITY GROUP: $25,000 over 3y, 9.9% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSouth Bay Youth Clubs Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LONG BEACH: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Global Partners For Development ↗
  • Who funds Whittier College ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
  • Who funds IMPROVE YOUR TOMORROW INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF FULLERTON INC ↗
  • Who funds The Prentice School ↗
  • Who funds HISPANIC MINISTRY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF FONTANA ↗
  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY ADULT ACHIEVEMENT CENTER DBA MY DAY COUNTS ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM 4 U ↗
  • Who funds HART COMMUNITY HOMES INC ↗
  • Who funds PRECIOUS LAMB PRESCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds DIGNITY GROUP ↗
  • Who funds DIY GIRLS ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds South Bay Youth Clubs Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LONG BEACH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA30.8× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Farmers & Merchants Bank Foundation · Southern California Housing Services · Pacific Youth Foundation · Boys & Girls Clubs of America · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brethren Community Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brethren Community Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Brethren’s filings →

    More from the funding graph