Skip to content

· Public charity

Breakfree Education

Our mission is to radically improve education in the juvenile and criminal justice systems by investing in the potential and dignity of all its students.

$198k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$204kFood & Nutrition$39kEducation$17kCivil Rights$15kHealth$10k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $62k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
$16,667
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEIGHBORS FOR JUSTICE$125,000
VISITORS SERVICE CENTER INC$28,333
DREAMING OUT LOUD$16,667
SEE FOREVER FOUNDATION$16,666
DC JUSTICE LAB$8,333
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NEIGHBORS FOR JUSTICE: $125k → 14%VISITORS SERVICE CENTER INC: $28k → 14%DREAMING OUT LOUD: $17k → 14%VOICES FOR A SECOND CHANCE: $10k → 14%DREAMING OUT LOUD: $10k → 14%SEE FOREVER FOUNDATION: $17k → 14%COUNCIL FOR COURT EXCELLENCE: $13k → 14%DC JUSTICE LAB: $8k → 14%COUNCIL FOR COURT EXCELLENCE: $10k → 14%SECOND LOOK PROJECT: $10k → 14%LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE EDUCATION: $15k → 14%MARTHA'S TABLE: $12k → 14%MARTHA'S TABLE: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

29%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$83k · 3 repeat orgs$202k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue 0% since the first grant, against -17% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

$83k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-17%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $167k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Crime & LegalYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VS
    VISITORS SERVICE CENTER INC VOICES FOR A SECOND CHANCE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $38k · revenue 0%
  • CF
    COUNCIL FOR COURT EXCELLENCE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $23k · revenue +51%
  • MT
    MARTHA'S TABLE SO INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $22k · revenue -75%

Funded once

  • TL
    THE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE EDUCATION FUND INC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -21%
  • SL
    SECOND LOOK PROJECT
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -17%
  • DO
    DREAMING OUT LOUD
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
District of Columbia Access to Justice

Work with DC courts, private bar & legal services providers to increase legal representations for low & moderate income DC residents, enhance efficiency of legal services, and reduce barriers to the judicial system.

Crime & Legal
2
Volunteer Legal Advocates

To advocate for domestic violence victims, at-risk children, and other vulnerable individuals by providing over $22.8m in pro bono legal services, social service referrals, and on-going support; to train and support a strong network of…

Housing & Shelter
3
The District of Columbia Bar Foundation

The district of columbia bar foundation was established to raise funds for organizations in the district that provide hands-on legal services to residents who are unable to afford legal assistance.

Crime & Legal
4
Coalition for Dc Representation in Congress Education Fund

Founded in 1998, dc vote is a national citizen engagement and advocacy organization dedicated to strengthening democracy and securing equality for all in the district of columbia.

Education
5
Dc Affordable Law Firm

DC Affordable Law Firm delivers accessible justice to modest-income DC residents who do not qualify for traditional sources of free civil legal services and cannot afford standard representation. Our innovative programming expands access…

Human Services
6
Dc Policy Center

The mission of the d.c. policy center is to arm decision makers with fact-based, unbiased, and reliable research and analyses to help create a vibrant local economy that can maximize opportunities for residents, workers, and businesses in…

Public Benefit
7
Open Dc
Community Improvement
8
Cityworks Dc

Our mission is to dramatically improve the early career outcomes of dc youth and young adults of color by creating innovative programs and by mobilizing employers, educators, and city leaders to create a local, diverse talent pipeline. our…

Education
9
Washington Dc Meals on Wheels Inc

We deliver healthy delicious meals to our home-bound neighbors. With a vision of creating a more interconnected resilient and compassionate community our program supports entire family systems. In 2024 236 volunteers delivered 55,642 meals…

—
10
Dc Bar Pro Bono Center

The D.C. Bar Pro Bono Center provides free legal services through pro bono lawyers to low-income individuals, nonprofit organizations and small businesses primarily in the District of Columbia. The Pro Bono Center also recruits and trains…

—
11
Dc Fiscal Policy Institute Inc

To shape racially-just tax, budget, and policy decisions by centering black and brown communities in our research and analysis, community partnerships, and advocacy efforts to advance an antiracist, equitable future.

Community Improvement
12
Legal Aid Society of the District of Columbia

Legal aid's mission is to 'make justice real' - in individual and systemic ways - for persons living in poverty in the district of columbia. in particular, legal aid provides civil legal assistance to individuals, families, and communities…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Leadership Conference Education Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Second Look Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEIGHBORS FOR JUSTICE: $125,000 · OtherNEIGHBORS FOR JUSTICECOUNCIL FOR COURT EXCELLENCE: $22,500 · OtherCOUNCIL FOR COURT EXCELLENCEDREAMING OUT LOUD: $10,000 · OtherDREAMING OUT LOUDVISITORS SERVICE CENTER INC VOICES FOR A SECOND CHANCE: $38,333 · Crime & LegalVISITORS SERVICE CENTER INC V…SEE FOREVER FOUNDATION: $16,666 · Crime & LegalSEE FOREVER FOUNDATIONSECOND LOOK PROJECT: $10,000 · Crime & LegalSECOND LOOK PROJECTDC JUSTICE LAB: $8,333 · Crime & LegalDC JUSTICE LABMARTHA'S TABLE SO INC: $22,361 · Food & NutritionDREAMING OUT LOUD INC: $16,667 · Youth DevelopmentTHE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE EDUCATION FUND INC: $15,000 · Public Benefit
Other$157,500Crime & Legal$73,332Food & Nutrition$22,361Youth Development$16,667Public Benefit$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVISITORS SERVICE CENTER INC VOICES FOR A SECOND CHANCE: $38,333 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR COURT EXCELLENCE: $22,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE SO INC: $22,361 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetDREAMING OUT LOUD INC: $16,667 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSEE FOREVER FOUNDATION: $16,666 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE EDUCATION FUND INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND LOOK PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC17.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · Diane & Norman Bernstein Foundation Inc · Eugene & Agnes E Meyer Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Breakfree Education funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Breakfree Education. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Breakfree Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph