Skip to content
Bradford T Blauvelt Memorial Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Bradford T Blauvelt Memorial Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$13kHuman Services$9kInternational$6kEducation$5kHousing & Shelter$2kFood & Nutrition$500
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$105k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONTACT OF OCEAN AND MONMOUTH COUNTIES$1,500
FAMILY PROMISE OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC$1,500
GEORGIAN COURT UNIVERSITY$1,350
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 6%ALTERNATIVES INC: $2k → 5%FAMILY PROMISE OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$24k · 5 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

$24k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+25%

Still filing today

80%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AM
    ASSOCIATION MULTIPLE IMPAIRED BLIND
    3× · 2018–2024 · $10k
  • DH
    DEBORAH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2023 · $5k · revenue -68%
  • GC
    GEORGIAN COURT UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $4k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • OC
    OCEAN COUNTY YMCA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +1%
  • AI
    Alternatives Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +25%
  • AE
    AMIB ENDOWMENT FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +84%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Department of Persons With Disabilities

We provide residential, vocational, social and spiritual programs for persons with developmental disabilities. we offer opportunities to become more active and valued members of society, and to participate fully in life with dignity and…

Human Services
2
The Arc Ocean County Chapter Inc

To advocate, provide opportunities and support necessary for all individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities to be accepted and valued as citizens of the communities in which they choose to live, learn, work and play.

Housing & Shelter
3
My Fathers House Inc

My Fathers House, Inc. provides assessment, evaluation, intensive outpatient treatment, outpatient treatment, individual counseling, family counseling and aftercare group services. MFHs operation are located in Gloucester City, New Jersey.

Health
4
Friendly Connections Inc

We are a family company that helps connect families and individuals with our friendly professionals. We have Coaching Services handled by our Direct Support Professionals (DSPs) in Supported Employment, Pre-Vocational Training, Community…

Health
5
Visiting Nurse Assn of Central Jersey Personal Care

Visiting nurse association health group, inc. and affiliates, which includes the organization, are organizations dedicated to helping individuals and families in achieving their best level of well-being by providing compassionate,…

—
6
Center for Developmental Disabilities

The center's mission is to help children and adults with differing abilities achieve their dreams by overcoming barriers to living, working, learning & enjoying recreational opportunities in the community of their choice.

Human Services
7
Virtua Medical Group Pa

The physicians of virtua medical group (vmg) share a common philosophy in all they do: to create an outstanding experience for patients. in a broad range of specialties, from family medicine to surgery to oncology, vmg's highly-trained…

Health
8
Family Promise of Cape May County

To provide shelter, meals and case management for homeless families, as well as aiding the families in finding a home , family services and training.

Human Services
9
Contact of Mercer County Nj Inc

CONTACT of Mercer County NJ, Inc. provides compassionate, confidential telephone crisis intervention for those who are in emotional turmoil, thinking about suicide, experiencing loneliness, or facing the challenges of mental illness.…

Health
10
Everas Community Services Inc

The mission of the agency is to provide innovative services that support independence and community inclusion. everas provides comprehensive, lifetime services that meet their potential for independence, and improve their quality of life.…

Human Services
11
Visiting Nurses Assn of Central Jersey Ventures Inc

Visiting nurse association health group, inc. and affiliates, which includes the organization, are organziations dedicated to helping individuals and families in achieving their best level of well-being by providing compassionate,…

—
12
Preferred Behavioral Health of Nj Inc

To deliver quality and compassionate behavioral health services to individuals and families all the time through a trauma informed care philosophy and approach.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Literacy New Jersey Inc; the most unlike its peers is Georgian Court University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASSOCIATION MULTIPLE IMPAIRED BLIND: $9,800 · OtherASSOCIATION MULTIPLE IMPAIRED BLINDCHILDHOOD LEUKEMIA FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · OtherCHILDHOOD LEUKEMIA FOUNDATION INCOCEAN COUNTY YMCA INC: $3,000 · OtherOCEAN COUNTY YMCA INCAMIB ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $1,500 · OtherAMIB ENDOWMENT FUND INCLITERACY NEW JERSEY INC: $1,500 · OtherLITERACY NEW JERSEY INCCONTACT USA INC: $1,500 · OtherCONTACT USA INCDEBORAH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $4,500 · HealthDEBORAH HOSPITAL FOUND…CONTACT OF OCEAN AND MONMOUTH INC: $2,500 · HealthCONTACT OF OCEAN AND M…GEORGIAN COURT UNIVERSITY: $3,950 · EducationGEORGIAN COU…Alternatives Inc: $1,500 · Human ServicesAlternati…FAMILY PROMISE OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY PR…COMMUNITY SERVICES INC OF OCEAN COUNTY: $500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$20,300Health$7,000Education$3,950Human Services$3,000Food & Nutrition$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDEBORAH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIAN COURT UNIVERSITY: $3,950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDHOOD LEUKEMIA FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOCEAN COUNTY YMCA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONTACT OF OCEAN AND MONMOUTH INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAlternatives Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMIB ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLITERACY NEW JERSEY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICES INC OF OCEAN COUNTY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oceanfirst FoundationCharles B Mathis Mem …Scott Carolyn J Char …The Jay and Linda Gru…Manasquan Bank Charit…New Jersey Natural Ga…The Provident Bank Fo…Community Foundation …Gertrude L Hirsch Cha…Wintrode Family Found…Kearnybank Foundation…The Bank of America C…
Oceanfirst FoundationNJ19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oceanfirst Foundation · Charles B Mathis Mem Tr · Scott Carolyn J Char Tua-Main · The Jay and Linda Grunin Foundation D/B/A Grunin Foundation · Manasquan Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · New Jersey Natural Gas Company Charity Inc · The Provident Bank Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Gertrude L Hirsch Charitable Trust · Wintrode Family Foundation Inc · Kearnybank Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bradford T Blauvelt Memorial Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bradford T Blauvelt Memorial Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Literacy New Jersey Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Alternatives Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Georgian Court University: 1% of income from government
  • Ocean County Ymca Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bradford T Blauvelt Memorial’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home