Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Brad and Laura Nielsen Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$75k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Community Improvement$131kHealth$131kHuman Services$57kHousing & Shelter$50kFood & Nutrition$20kYouth Development$8kCrime & Legal$4kArts & Culture$900Other$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Down Syndrome Alliance$20,000
Abide Network$20,000
Lutheran Family Services$15,000
Open Door Mission$10,000
Assure Womens Center$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Open Door Mission: $10k → 12%Open Door Mission: $10k → 12%Open Door Mission: $10k → 12%Open Door Mission: $10k → 12%Open Door Mission: $10k → 12%Lutheran Family Services: $15k → 12%Lutheran Family Services: $10k → 12%Lutheran Family Services: $10k → 12%Lutheran Family Services: $10k → 12%Lutheran Family Services: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$399k · 11 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
4

Total granted

$399k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+65%

Still filing today

73%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalFood & NutritionEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AW
    Assure Womens Center
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +106%
  • LF
    LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $55k · revenue +35%
  • OD
    OPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • IR
    Integrated Refugee Services
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • LA
    LOAVES AND FISHES NEW HAVEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue +65%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Human Choice of Iowa

Mission is to provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education. we are faith-based with a mission to encourage, through education and outreach, the recognition of human life from the moment of…

Human Services
2
Food Bank of Iowa

The organization receives, warehouses, and distributes salvageable food items to non-profit tax exempt member agencies to feed the ill, needy, and infants.

Food & Nutrition
3
Children's Physicians

Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.

Health
4
Family Promise of Greater Des Moines

To provide shelter and services to families experiencing homelessness

5
New Horizon Family Health Services Inc

To provide healthcare and related services.

Health
6
Feeding South Dakota

To eliminate hunger in south dakota.

Food & Nutrition
7
Feed the Hunger Inc

Feeding the spiritual and physical hunger, especially in at-risk children.

8
Share Omaha

Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.

Philanthropy
9
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
10
Omaha Church Center Inc

None

11
Nebraska Children & Families Foundation

Nebraska children's mission is to create positive change for children through community engagement. our vision is a nebraska where all children will have the resources and support to reach their full potential. our values are (1)…

Philanthropy
12
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Center for Kids Inc and the most unlike its peers is Net Foundation for Television. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ABIDE NETWORK INC — $131,000 · OtherABIDE NETWORK INCDown Syndrome Alliance — $66,275 · OtherDown Syndrome AllianceFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND — $19,000 · OtherFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND+4 more — $2,300 · OtherLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC — $55,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF N…OPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE — $50,000 · Human ServicesOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN …Assure Womens Center — $60,000 · HealthAssure Womens Cent…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $4,600 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITA…HOPE CENTER FOR KIDS INC — $8,000 · Youth DevelopmentPROJECT HARMONY — $4,000 · Crime & LegalLOAVES AND FISHES NEW HAVEN INC — $500 · Food & NutritionALL OUR KIN INC — $500 · Education
Other$218,575Human Services$105,000Health$64,600Youth Development$8,000Crime & Legal$4,000Food & Nutrition$500Education$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetABIDE NETWORK INC — $131,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetAssure Womens Center — $60,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC — $55,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE — $50,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND — $19,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE CENTER FOR KIDS INC — $8,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $4,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HARMONY — $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLOAVES AND FISHES NEW HAVEN INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALL OUR KIN INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNET FOUNDATION FOR TELEVISION — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ABIDE NETWORK INC
  • Who funds Assure Womens Center
  • Who funds LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND
  • Who funds HOPE CENTER FOR KIDS INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PROJECT HARMONY
  • Who funds LOAVES AND FISHES NEW HAVEN INC
  • Who funds ALL OUR KIN INC
  • Who funds NET FOUNDATION FOR TELEVISION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Growing Good FoundationNE13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Growing Good Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Brad and Laura Nielsen Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • All Our Kin Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Brad and Laura Nielsen Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Brad and Laura Nielsen Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph