Skip to content

· Private foundation

Br Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$94k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$106kHuman Services$52kHealth$48kEducation$27kHousing & Shelter$23kEmployment$20kEnvironment$15kAnimals$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $23k
$5,550
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
R VIDHYA AASHRAM$12,390
INDIAN AMERICAN CULTURAL CTR$10,975
PROCURE$9,700
SALAVATION ARMY$8,650
SALVATION ARMY$8,395
LUBEZNIK CENTER FOR THE ARTS$7,595
FRIENDSHIP BOTANICAL GARDENS$6,100
OPEN BOOKS LTD$5,981
ASHLEY HOUSE$5,550
NOTRE DAME SCHOOL$5,250
PCS FOR PEOPLE$3,850
CENTER FOR CREATIVE SOLUTIONS$2,500
WORLD FOOD ORG$2,089
HINDU TEMPLE OF GREATER CHICAGO$1,502
ST STANISLAUS CHURCH$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PCS FOR PEOPLE: $4k → 14%FAMILY ADVOCATES: $4k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
OR
IN
CA
VA
MD
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$279k · 17 repeat orgs$108k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
28

Total granted

$279k
$86k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+16%

Still filing today

35%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionAnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FH
    FRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $18k · revenue +14%
  • CC
    CITIZENS CONCERNED FOR THE HOMELESS INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $15k · revenue +79%
  • MH
    MICHIANA HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $14k · revenue +138%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $21k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $8k
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Adult Congenital Heart Association

To empower the congenital heart disease (chd) community by advancing access to resources and specialized care that improve patient-centered outcomes.

Health
2
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
3
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
4
American Health Law Association

The mission of the american health law association is to deliver authoritative educational content and serve as a professional home for all who engage with health law.

—
5
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
6
American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health
7
Los Angeles County Bar Association (Lacba)

Meeting the professional needs of los angeles lawyers, and improving the administration of justice.

—
8
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

—
9
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce

Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…

—
10
American Arbitration Association Inc

The american arbitration association ("aaa") is dedicated to effective, efficient and economical methods of dispute resolution through education, technology and solutions-oriented service.

Crime & Legal
11
American College Health Association

The american college health association (acha) serves as the principal leadership organization for advancing the health of college students and campus communities through advocacy, education, and research.

Health
12
Association of Legal Administrators

Ala is the catalyst for growth by providing: diverse educational experiences, engaged peer communities, strategic solutions, dynamic resources, and trusted networks.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meals On Wheels America; the most unlike its peers is The Play for Jake Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INDIAN AMERICAN CULTURAL CTR: $64,336 · OtherINDIAN AMERICAN CULTURAL CTRPROCURE: $29,000 · OtherPROCURESALAVATION ARMY: $27,055 · OtherSALAVATION ARMYIndividual grant recipient: $21,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGOODWILL: $19,875 · OtherGOODWILLCENTER FOR CREATIVE SOLUTIONS INC: $15,000 · OtherFRIENDSHIP BOTANICAL GARDENS: $13,700 · OtherR VIDHYA AASHRAM: $12,855 · Other+34 more: $100,124 · Other+34 moreFRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $18,227 · PhilanthropyASHLEY HOUSE: $12,850 · HealthAMERICAN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION INSTITUTE: $3,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,350 · HealthCITIZENS CONCERNED FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $14,652 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $100 · Housing & ShelterMICHIANA HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $13,700 · AnimalsTHE JACK AND SHIRLEY LUBEZNIK CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $12,895 · Arts & CultureFAMILY ADVOCATES INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesPCS FOR PEOPLE: $3,850 · Human Services
Other$302,945Philanthropy$18,227Health$17,200Housing & Shelter$14,752Animals$13,700Arts & Culture$12,895Human Services$7,850

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $18,227 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCITIZENS CONCERNED FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $14,652 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetMICHIANA HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $13,700 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE JACK AND SHIRLEY LUBEZNIK CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $12,895 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetASHLEY HOUSE: $12,850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN BOOKS LTD: $5,981 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetREINS OF LIFE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFAMILY ADVOCATES INC: $4,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPCS FOR PEOPLE: $3,850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION INSTITUTE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA: $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION: $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PLAY FOR JAKE FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS CONCERNED FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds MICHIANA HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JACK AND SHIRLEY LUBEZNIK CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds ASHLEY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds OPEN BOOKS LTD ↗
  • Who funds REINS OF LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds PCS FOR PEOPLE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duneland Health CouncilIN15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duneland Health Council · Unity Foundation of la Porte County · The Barker Welfare Foundation · Michigan City Community Enrichment Corporation · Healthcare Foundation of la Porte Inc · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Lilly Endowment Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Br Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Br Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • American Gastroenterological Association Institute: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Br Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Br Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Br’s filings →

More from the funding graph