Skip to content

· Public charity

Boys & Girls Clubs in Tennessee

To promote exclusively the social welfare of boys and girls in tennessee; to provide guidance and to promote the health, social, educational, vocational, character, and cultural development of boys and girls in tennessee without regard to race, color, creed, or national origin; and to receive, invest, and disburse funds, and to hold…

$20M
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5.9M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$61M
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k4 grants · $811k
  • $250k+16 grants · $19M
$619,306
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
B&GC OF TENNESSEE VALLEYKNOXVILLE$5,902,673
B&GC OF OCOEE REGIONCLEVELAND$2,251,792
B&GC OF DUMPLIN VALLEY$1,636,876
B&GC OF CHATTANOOGA$1,286,666
B&GC OF MAURY COUNTY SOUTH CENTRAL TN$1,089,291
B&GC OF GREATER KINGSPORT$991,499
B&GC OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE$780,883
B&GC OF SMOKY MOUNTAINS$679,529
B&GC OF JOHNSON CITYWA COUNTY$644,475
B&GC OF GREATER MEMPHIS$619,306
B&GC OF GREENVILLE$612,432
B&GC OF JACKSONMADISON CO$545,418
B&GC OF NORTHWEST TN$513,583
B&GC OF MOUNTAIN EMPIRE$491,214
B&GC OF CUMBERLAND PLATEAU$441,106
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 41% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 13%B&GC of Maury County: $1.6M → 10%B&GC OF DUMPLIN VALLEY: $1.6M → 11%B&GC OF TENNESSEE VALLEYKNOXVILLE: $5.9M → 12%B&GC OF CHATTANOOGA: $1.3M → 12%B&GC of Ocoee RegionCleveland: $2.3M → 13%B&GC OF HATCHIE RIVER: $300k → 14%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $234k → 14%B&GC OF JACKSONMADISON CO: $545k → 15%B&GC OF MORRISTOWN: $237k → 15%B&GC of Greater Memphis: $900k → 17%B&GC of ElizabethtonCarter Co: $646k → 18%B&GC OF CUMBERLAND PLATEAU: $441k → 22%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB of Maury County - pulaski: $1.2M → 10%B&GC of Dumplin Valley: $881k → 11%B&GC of Tennessee ValleyKnoxville: $4.3M → 12%B&GC OF CHATTANOOGA: $304k → 12%B&GC OF OCOEE REGIONCLEVELAND: $2.3M → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $216k → 14%B&GC of JacksonMadison Co: $243k → 15%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB of Greater Memphis: $706k → 17%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB of Elizabethton: $500k → 18%B&GC of Cumberland Plateau: $418k → 22%B&GC OF MAURY COUNTY SOUTH CENTRAL TN: $1.1M → 10%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB of Dumplin Valley: $340k → 11%B&GC of Tennessee ValleyKNOXVILLE: $4.1M → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB of Ocoee Region - Monroe Area: $1.9M → 13%B&GC OF GREATER MEMPHIS: $619k → 17%B&GC OF ELIZABETHTONCARTER CO: $213k → 18%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB of Cumberland Plateau: $322k → 22%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MAURY COUNTY - PULASKI: $236k → 10%B&GC OF DUMPLIN VALLEY: $215k → 11%B&GC OF TENNESSEE VALLEYKNOXVILLE: $675k → 12%B&GC OF OCOEE REGIONCLEVELAND: $303k → 13%B&GC of Middle Tennessee: $1.8M → 14%B&GC OF MAURY COUNTY SOUTH CENTRAL TN: $226k → 10%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DUMPLIN VALLEY: $206k → 11%B&GC OF TENNESSEE VALLEYKNOXVILLE: $350k → 12%B&GC OF OCOEE REGIONCLEVELAND: $281k → 13%B&GC OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $781k → 14%B&GC OF MAURY COUNTY: $206k → 10%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DUMPLIN VALLEY: $206k → 11%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE TENNESSEE VALLEY: $444k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OCOEE REGION - MONROE AREA: $242k → 13%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB of Middle Tennessee: $557k → 14%B&GC OF DUMPLIN VALLEY: $196k → 11%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE TENNESSEE VALLEY: $441k → 12%B&GC OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $189k → 14%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE TENNESSEE VALLEY: $370k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$61M · 22 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
0

Total granted

$61M
$0

Still filing today

95%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $17M · revenue +56% · 38% of their budget
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE OCOEE REGION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $7.5M · revenue +258% · 38% of their budget
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE SMOKY MOUNTAINS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $5.2M · revenue +20% · 42% of their budget

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Boys Girls Club
    —
    2
    Boys and Girls Club of Augusta/Waynesboro

    To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible citizens.

    Youth Development
    3
    Boys and Girls Clubs of West Central Missouri

    The mission of the boys & girls clubs of west central missouri is to inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential as caring and productive citizens.

    Youth Development
    4
    Boys and Girls Club of Glacier Country

    To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

    Youth Development
    5
    Boys & Girls Club of the Missouri River Area

    To enable all young people, especially those who need them most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

    Youth Development
    6
    Boys & Girls Clubs of North Central Georgia

    To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need it most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

    Youth Development
    7
    Boys and Girls Club of Carroll County Inc

    To inspire and enable all youth to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

    Youth Development
    8
    Boys & Girls Club of the Greater West Plains Area

    To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive and caring citizens.

    Youth Development
    9
    Boys & Girls Clubs of the Northwoods Inc

    To empower all youth, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

    Youth Development
    10
    Boys & Girls Clubs of Cumberland County

    To inspire all youth especially those who need us the most to become productive, responsible and caring citizens.

    Youth Development
    11
    Boys & Girls Clubs of Southeastern Nc Foundation Inc
    —
    12
    Boys and Girls Club of Bartlesville

    To enable our young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their potential.

    Youth Development
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Clubs of Chattanooga Inc; the most unlike its peers is Monroe Area Youth Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    17
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    14
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    21/21
    Grantees still filing
    20/21
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALL: $16,600,598 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALLBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH CENTRAL TENN: $4,779,361 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH CENTRAL TENNBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $4,082,034 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF MIDDLE TENNESSEEBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DUMPLIN VALLEY: $3,772,670 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DUMPLIN VALLEYBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RUTHERFORD CTY: $2,731,297 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RUTHERFORD CTYBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MEMPHIS: $2,266,377 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MEMPHISBoys and Girls Club of Jackson: $1,478,350 · Youth Development+7 more: $4,319,027 · Youth Development+7 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE OCOEE REGION: $7,527,788 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE OCOEE REGIO…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE SMOKY MOUNTAINS: $5,210,759 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE SMOKY MOUN…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHATTANOOGA INC: $2,468,254 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHATTANOOGA I…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER KINGSPORT INC: $2,013,425 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER KINGSPOR…Boys and Girls Club of Elizabethton Carter County Inc: $1,654,081 · OtherBoys and Girls Club of Elizabethton C…Boys & Girls Club of the Mountain Empire: $1,522,789 · OtherBoys & Girls Club of the Mountain Emp…+1 more: $70,044 · OtherBoys and Girls Club of Greeneville & Greene County: $999,836 · Human Services
    Youth Development$40,029,714Other$20,467,140Human Services$999,836

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALL: $16,600,598 over 8y, 38% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE OCOEE REGION: $7,527,788 over 8y, 38% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE SMOKY MOUNTAINS: $5,210,759 over 8y, 42% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH CENTRAL TENN: $4,779,361 over 8y, 46% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $4,082,034 over 8y, 29% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DUMPLIN VALLEY: $3,772,670 over 8y, 85% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RUTHERFORD CTY: $2,731,297 over 8y, 36% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHATTANOOGA INC: $2,468,254 over 8y, 37% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MEMPHIS: $2,266,377 over 5y, 16% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER KINGSPORT INC: $2,013,425 over 8y, 70% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Elizabethton Carter County Inc: $1,654,081 over 8y, 42% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of the Mountain Empire: $1,522,789 over 8y, 25% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Jackson: $1,478,350 over 8y, 59% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE CUMBERLAND PL: $1,282,014 over 7y, 43% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Greeneville & Greene County: $999,836 over 8y, 30% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Northwest Ten: $905,957 over 8y, 45% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF JOHNSON CITY WASHINGTON COUNTY: $802,784 over 8y, 68% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE HATCHIE RIVER: $491,673 over 8y, 46% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MORRISTOWN INC: $372,695 over 8y, 21% of budgetMONROE AREA YOUTH CENTER: $238,266 over 3y, 11% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CLINCH VALLEY: $225,638 over 6y, 25% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TENNESSEE VALL ↗
    • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE OCOEE REGION ↗
    • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE SMOKY MOUNTAINS ↗
    • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH CENTRAL TENN ↗
    • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE ↗
    • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DUMPLIN VALLEY ↗
    • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RUTHERFORD CTY ↗
    • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHATTANOOGA INC ↗
    • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MEMPHIS ↗
    • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER KINGSPORT INC ↗
    • Who funds Boys and Girls Club of Elizabethton Carter County Inc ↗
    • Who funds Boys & Girls Club of the Mountain Empire ↗
    • Who funds Boys and Girls Club of Jackson ↗
    • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE CUMBERLAND PL ↗
    • Who funds Boys and Girls Club of Greeneville & Greene County ↗
    • Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Northwest Ten ↗
    • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF JOHNSON CITY WASHINGTON COUNTY ↗
    • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE HATCHIE RIVER ↗
    • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MORRISTOWN INC ↗
    • Who funds MONROE AREA YOUTH CENTER ↗
    • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CLINCH VALLEY ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Boys & Girls Clubs of AmericaGA41.8× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Boys & Girls Clubs of America · Boys & Girls Clubs of America (Group Return) · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · East Tennessee Foundation · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Good360 · Inspire Brands Foundation Inc · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · Speedway Children's Charities · Cadence Bank Foundation · Carmax Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Boys & Girls Clubs in Tennessee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Boys & Girls Clubs in Tennessee. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Boys & Girls Clubs in Tennessee’s filings →

      More from the funding graph