· Public charity
Boys & Girls Clubs in Colorado Inc
None
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k5 grants · $163k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $1.4M
- $250k+3 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PUEBLO COUNTY | $544,716 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER | $285,995 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CHAFFEE COUNTY | $258,042 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHWEST COLORADO | $243,423 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF HIGH ROCKIES | $219,893 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LA PLATA COUNTY | $182,077 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BLACK CANYON | $160,621 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LARIMER COUNTY | $144,370 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN LUIS VALLEY | $131,080 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WELD COUNTY | $109,926 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION | $104,147 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF FREMONT COUNTY | $74,981 |
| PETERSON AFB YOUTH PROGRAM | $45,951 |
| BUCKLEY AIR FORCE YOUTH CENTER | $40,024 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS SOUTHERN UTE | $35,961 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
24 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC8× · 2017–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +47%- BGBoys & Girls Clubs of Pueblo County5× · 2020–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +162%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LARIMER COUNTY8× · 2017–2024 · $955k · revenue +90%
Funded once
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN UTEone grant, 2019 · $46k
- FCFORT CARSON CHILD & YOUTH SERVICES CENone grant, 2020 · $22k
- FCFORT CARSON CHILD & YOUTH SERVICES CENTREone grant, 2021 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible citizens.
The boys & girls club's mission is to inspire and enable all youth of the northern cheyenne nation and surrounding areas to be productive citizens.
Enable young people, especially those from disadvantaged circumstances to realize their full potential as productive, responsible & caring citizens.
To provide opportunities for youth to learn and succeed.
To inspire and enable all young people, especially those most in need of our services, to realize and develop their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens in a global society.
Provide youth ages 5-17 with character development, leadership skills, education, career guidance, training for healthy habits, and life skills development to help them reach their full potential as caring, productive, responsible citizens.
To enable and inspire all young people, ages five to eighteen, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens.
The mission of the boys & girls clubs of west central missouri is to inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential as caring and productive citizens.
To inspire and enable all young people especially those in need to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.
To empower all youth, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of Northwest Colo and the most unlike its peers is Boys and Girls Club of South Park. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Pueblo County ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LARIMER COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHAFFEE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WELD COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHWEST COLO ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LA PLATA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE SAN LUIS VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds Boys and Girls Club of South Park ↗
- Who funds BLACK CANYON BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF FREMONT COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boys & Girls Clubs of America (Group Return) · Boys & Girls Clubs of America · Boys and Girls Clubs of Metro Denver Inc · El Pomar Foundation · Adolph Coors Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · The Edmund T & Eleanor Quick Foundation · Caring for Colorado Foundation · Johnson Foundation of the Rockies · Duncan John G Tuw
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Boys & Girls Clubs in Colorado Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.