Skip to content
Boys and Girls Club of the Northern Indiana Corridor Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Boys and Girls Club of the Northern Indiana Corridor Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

$957k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$329k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $72k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $292k
  • $250k+2 grants · $582k
$75,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAREER ACADEMY OF SOUTH BEND$329,291
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HUNTINGTON$252,554
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE$102,500
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER NORTHW$75,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHEAST IN$60,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SEYMOUR JEN$54,188
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF INDIANAPOLIS$43,125
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MORGAN COUNT$28,375
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 74% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER NORTHW: $75k → 9%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MORGAN COUNT: $28k → 9%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SEYMOUR JEN: $54k → 11%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHEAST IN: $60k → 12%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HUNTINGTON: $253k → 13%CAREER ACADEMY OF SOUTH BEND: $329k → 13%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF INDIANAPOLIS: $43k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys Girls Club
—
2
Boys and Girls Club of Augusta/Waynesboro

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
3
Boys & Girls Clubs of the San Gorgonio Pass

To inspire and enable all young people especially those in need to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Education
4
Boys & Girls Clubs of Southwest Virginia Inc

To enable and inspire all young people, ages five to eighteen, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens.

Youth Development
5
Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Peoria Inc

To enable young people, especially those who need us most to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
6
Boys & Girls Clubs of the Northwoods Inc

To empower all youth, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
7
Boys and Girls Club of the Northern Cheyenne Nation

The boys & girls club's mission is to inspire and enable all youth of the northern cheyenne nation and surrounding areas to be productive citizens.

Youth Development
8
Boys & Girls Club of Baldwin and Jones Co Inc

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

—
9
The Boys & Girls Clubs Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those most in need of our services, to realize and develop their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens in a global society.

—
10
Boys & Girls Club of the Missouri River Area

To enable all young people, especially those who need them most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development
11
Boys & Girls Clubs of the North Valley

To inspire and enable all young people to reach their full potential as caring, productive, and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
12
Boys & Girls Club of Bloomfield

The corporation provides youth with after school activities to promote education, sports and recreation.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Northwest Indiana Inc; the most unlike its peers is Career Academy of South Bend Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
0/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HUNTINGTON COUNTY INC: $252,554 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HUNTINGTON COUNTY INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER NORTHWEST INDIANA INC: $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER NORTHWEST INDIAN…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST IND: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST INDCAREER ACADEMY OF SOUTH BEND INC: $329,291 · EducationCAREER ACADEMY OF SOUTH BEND INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MORGAN COUNTY: $28,375 · EducationBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MORGAN COUNTYBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INC: $102,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EV…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SEYMOUR INC: $54,188 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SE…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF INDIANAPOLIS INC: $43,125 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF…
Youth Development$387,554Education$357,666Other$199,813

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAREER ACADEMY OF SOUTH BEND INC: $329,291 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HUNTINGTON COUNTY INC: $252,554 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EVANSVILLE INC: $102,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER NORTHWEST INDIANA INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST IND: $60,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SEYMOUR INC: $54,188 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF INDIANAPOLIS INC: $43,125 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MORGAN COUNTY: $28,375 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boys & Girls Clubs of…Boys & Girls Clubs of…Boys & Girls Clubs in…Lilly Endowment IncDollar General Litera…Indiana Youth Institu…The Blackbaud Giving …Good Sports IncGood360Duke Energy FoundationCharities Aid Foundat…American Online Givin…
Boys & Girls Clubs of America (Group Return)GA19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boys & Girls Clubs of America (Group Return) · Boys & Girls Clubs of America · Boys & Girls Clubs in Indiana Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · Indiana Youth Institute Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Good Sports Inc · Good360 · Duke Energy Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Boys and Girls Club of the Northern Indiana Corridor Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Boys and Girls Club of the Northern Indiana Corridor Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Boys and Girls Club of the Northern Indiana Corridor’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home