· Public charity
Boys & Girls Club of Salem Marion & Polk Counties
To inspire and enable all youth grades 1-12, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens through the development of a positive self-image and self-reliance.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SALEM MARION & POLK COUNTIES’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SALEM MARION & POLK COUNTIES FOUNDATION | $2,775,592 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 94% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the boys & girls clubs of west central missouri is to inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential as caring and productive citizens.
To enable all young people, especially those who need them most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible citizens.
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.
To inspire and enable all young people especially those in need to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.
Provide opportunities for positive and healthy growth for youth in our communities.
To enable all young people, especially those that need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.
To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive and caring citizens.
To inspire and enable all young people to reach their full potential as caring, productive, and responsible citizens.
To inspire and enable all youth to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.
To provide mentoring programs for at risk youth with educational and recreational opportunities that they normally may not be able to experience.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Club of Sw Oregon and the most unlike its peers is Boys and Girls Clubs of Portland Metropolitan Area. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SALEM MARION & POLK COUNTIES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE GREATER SANTIAM ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE ROGUE VALLEY ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF BEND INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ALBANY ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CORVALLIS INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE UMPQUA VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WESTERN TREASURE VALLEY ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SW OREGON ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Western Lane County ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF EMERALD VALLEY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boys & Girls Clubs of America · The Oregon Community Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · The Autzen Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · Dutch Bros Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Braemar Charitable Trust · The Roundhouse Foundation · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · Good360
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Boys & Girls Club of Salem Marion & Polk Counties funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Boys and Girls Clubs of Bend Inc — 16% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Corvallis Inc — 16% of income from government
- Boys and Girls Clubs of Emerald Valley — 15% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of the Greater Santiam — 14% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Albany — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.