Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bowling Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$298k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$84k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$460kHealth$412kYouth Development$361kHuman Services$334kHousing & Shelter$297kCivil Rights$125kEducation$39kPhilanthropy$36kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $147k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $144k
$24,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$31k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA OF EL PASO$83,500
SOUTHWEST COALITION$60,000
KINGDOM OF CHRIST MINISTRY$30,050
PASO DEL NORTE COMMUNITY FNDN$30,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$25,000
FREEDOM IN CHRIST RESIDENTIAL CENT$24,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$13,200
SOCIETY ST VINCENT DE PAUL$13,000
EL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER$12,000
OUR LADYS YOUTH CENTER$6,500
EL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$700
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $300) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RESCUE MISSION OF EL PASO: $300 → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 14 repeat orgs$453k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
12

Total granted

$1.6M
$427k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+69%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsHuman ServicesReligionCivil RightsEducationFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EP
    EL PASO VILLA MARIA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $272k · revenue +92%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF EP
    5× · 2017–2025 · $132k · revenue +11%
  • SC
    SOUTHWEST COALITION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $125k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • SM
    SAINT MATTHEW CATHOLIC PARISH
    one grant, 2017 · $300k
  • EP
    EL PASO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +68%
  • HO
    HOUSE OF HOPE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
El Paso Center for Children Inc

El paso center for children, inc's purpose is to provide homes for dependent and neglected children and an array of support services for emotionally disturbed children, adolescents, and their families. the organization operates entirely in…

2
El Paso Coalition for the Homeless Inc

The coalition is designated as the lead entity by hud for dozens of agencies and indivduals who provide housing, services, and support to the homeless community in el paso and carries out the responsibility of leading and managing the…

Housing & Shelter
3
El Paso Human Services Inc

El paso human services, inc. (ephsi), a private non-profit multi-purpose organization, has been providing social services in el paso county since 1984. ephsi has extensive experience in developing, implementing and executing federal, state…

Human Services
4
El Paso Area Christian Counseling Service

Counseling Services offering hope, healing, and restoration to hurting people, marriages, and families using respected therapy practices and solid biblical principles.

Human Services
5
Hospice of El Paso Inc

The mission of hospice of el paso, inc. is to provide interdisciplinary care designed to meet the physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of patients and their families who are coping with terminal illness and resulting losses.

Human Services
6
El Paso Collaborative for Community & Economic Development

The mission of the el paso collaborative is to facilitate affordable housing and small business and economic development in el paso and contiguous counties. the collaborative implements its mission by providing loan products and…

Community Improvement
7
El Paso Chamber of Commerce Foundation

The el paso chamber exists to operate exclusively for charitable, educational, scientific, and literary purposes relating to the city of el paso. the chamber foundation serves as its supporting organization to pursue grants to fund…

8
El Paso Matters Inc

Engage in the highest quality independent production, publication and or distribution of orginial news and or news-based materials of community value to far west texas, southern new mexico and northern chihuahua, mexico.

Public Benefit
9
La Fe Community Development Corporation

To provide low income housing to the community of el paso, texas.

Human Services
10
Justice for Our Neighbors El Paso

Jfon el paso is a faith-based ministry providing affordable, high-quality immigration legal services and advocating for immigrants rights in west texas and southern new mexico

11
Child Crisis Center of El Paso Inc

The mission of the Child Crisis Center is to protect children, newborn through fifteen years of age, from abuse/neglect by providing temporary short-term emergency shelter and family support services.

Human Services
12
El Buen Samaritano Episcopal Mission

El Buen Samaritano an outreach ministry of the Episcopal Diocese of Texas serving the Latino community of Central Texas is committed to recognizing the dignity of all by ensuring access to health care education and essential needs that…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Paso Villa Maria Inc and the most unlike its peers is Southwest Coalition Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RECOVERY ALLIANCE — $302,400 · OtherRECOVERY ALLIANCESAINT MATTHEW CATHOLIC PARISH — $300,000 · OtherSAINT MATTHEW CATHOLIC PARISHOUR LADY'S YOUTH CENTER — $288,500 · OtherOUR LADY'S YOUTH CENTEREL PASO VILLA MARIA INC — $272,000 · OtherEL PASO VILLA MARIA INCYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF EP — $131,500 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF EPKINGDOM OF CHRIST MINISTRY — $92,350 · OtherKINGDOM OF CHRIST MINISTRYTEEN CHALLENGE EL PASO — $72,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH — $62,850 · Other+14 more — $106,800 · Other+14 moreFreedom In Christ Residential Centers — $144,500 · ReligionEL PASO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CORPORATION — $100,000 · HealthPaso del Norte Community Foundation — $30,000 · HealthSOUTHWEST COALITION INC — $125,000 · Civil RightsSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $38,500 · EducationEL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER — $35,100 · Food & NutritionTHE LABOURE SOCIETY INC — $5,000 · PhilanthropyEL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $700 · Philanthropy
Other$1,628,400Religion$144,500Health$130,000Civil Rights$125,000Education$38,500Food & Nutrition$35,100Philanthropy$5,700

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEL PASO VILLA MARIA INC — $272,000 over 8y, 14% of budgetFreedom In Christ Residential Centers — $144,500 over 6y, 8.2% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF EP — $131,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetSOUTHWEST COALITION INC — $125,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetEL PASO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CORPORATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $38,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER — $35,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LABOURE SOCIETY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEL PASO DOWNTOWN LIONS CLUB — $4,300 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESCUE MISSION OF EL PASO INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EL PASO VILLA MARIA INC
  • Who funds Freedom In Christ Residential Centers
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF EP
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST COALITION INC
  • Who funds EL PASO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CORPORATION
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds EL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER
  • Who funds Paso del Norte Community Foundation
  • Who funds THE LABOURE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds EL PASO DOWNTOWN LIONS CLUB
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC
  • Who funds EL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds RESCUE MISSION OF EL PASO INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

El Paso Community FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: El Paso Community Foundation · Paso del Norte Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bowling Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph