· Public charity
Bowen Family Foundation
Sponsor fundraising events for the benefit of local charities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $224,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $273,690 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $49,690 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $111k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WACO FAMILY MEDICINE | $50,000 |
| REACH THERAPEUTIC RIDING | $50,000 |
| INSPIRACION INC | $20,000 |
| GUARDIAN THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP | $20,000 |
| UNBOUND GLOBAL | $20,000 |
| HEART OF TEXAS CENTER OF BUSINESS EXCELLENCE | $18,000 |
| THE MENTORING ALLIANCE | $18,000 |
| TOGETHER FOR GOOD | $15,000 |
| COOK CHILDRENS HEALTH CARE SYSTEM | $7,500 |
| BIKERS AGAINST CHILD ABUSE | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $88k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $116k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
UNBOUND NOW3× · 2021–2024 · $140k · revenue +816%- CCCHEYANNA'S CHAMPIONS 4 CHILDREN3× · 2021–2023 · $74k · revenue +78%
- MAMENTORING ALLIANCE3× · 2021–2024 · $46k · revenue +140%
Funded once
- TATHE ARC OF MCLENNAN COUNTYone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue -55%
- JFJMB FISHING FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $30k · 79% of their budget
- CFCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue +29%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To achieve a brighter future for children, neighbors and communities by inspiring and cultivating healthy neighborhoods.
To strengthen the lives of children and families.
Texans Care for Children shapes public policies and brings Texans together to make children a statewide priority. We work so kids can have what they need to be healthy, secure, and thriving and so every Texan can have the best start to…
The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.
To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education, and research.
Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.
Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.
Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.
Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.
RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…
To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.
Texas oncology foundation is organized exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, literary, and educational purposes, including, for the purpose of making distributions to organizations that qualify as exempt organizations under…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is New Braunfels Downtown Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 8% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNBOUND NOW ↗
- Who funds TRIS SPEAKER YOUTH CLUB ↗
- Who funds MCLENNAN COUNTY MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHEYANNA'S CHAMPIONS 4 CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds REACH THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER ↗
- Who funds MENTORING ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds INSPIRACION INC ↗
- Who funds ADVOCACY CENTER FOR CRIME VICTIMS AND CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF MCLENNAN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds JMB FISHING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER WACO COLLECTIVE IMPACT INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds REAL LIFE REAL MUSIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL FOR LIFE ↗
- Who funds WACO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW BRAUNFELS DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds CREATIVE WACO ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS WACO ↗
- Who funds Together For Good Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ONESTAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Brazos Education Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds WACO BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ↗
- Who funds Community Cancer Association ↗
- Who funds IMAGINATION LIBRARY OF WACO ↗
- Who funds TALITHA KOUM INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds JAB CARES ↗
- Who funds Cook Children's Health Care System ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds BACA International Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Cooper Foundation · Ascension Providence · Waco Foundation · Margaret Cb & S Spencer N Brown Foundation Inc · United Way of Waco-McLennan County · Bernard & Audre Rapoport Foundation · The Fentress Foundation · Baylor University · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Clifton Foundation · The McClane Brown Family Foundation · Hillcrest Baptist Medical Center
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bowen Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.