Skip to content

· Private foundation

Borsand Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$363k
Granted FY2025still arriving
106
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$240k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$1.7MEducation$137kPhilanthropy$37kArts & Culture$7kHealth$6kFood & Nutrition$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 106 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k101 grants · $65k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $59k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $240k
$180
Median grant
14
States reached
$6.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD CHAI CENTER$240,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
YESHIVAS DARCHEI TORAH$13,500
SARA TUGMAN BAIS CHABAD TORAH CENTE$10,100
ATZMI$10,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF METRO DETROIT$6,450
KOLLEL INSTITUTE OF DETROIT$5,960
YESHIVA BETH YEHUDAH$5,036
TEP$3,460
LUBAVITCH CHEDER$3,380
CONG BETH TEFILO EMANUEL TIKVAH$3,000
FARBER HEBREW DAY SCHOOL$2,500
YAD EZRA$2,160
CHAB LUB OF FT LAUDERDALE BY THE$2,000
CHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DETROIT FRIENDS OF BONEI OLAM: $1k → 20%DETROIT FRIENDS OF BONEI OLAM: $1k → 20%DETROIT FRIENDS OF BONEI OLAM: $1k → 20%DETROIT FRIENDS OF BONEI OLAM: $1k → 20%DETROIT FRIENDS OF BONEI OLAM: $1k → 20%KEREN SIMCHAS CHOSSON: $70 → 20%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $180 → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $180 → 8%DETROIT CHESED PROJECT: $1k → 8%JARC: $1k → 8%DETROIT CHESED PROJECT: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
NJ
CA
MD
KS
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 57 repeat orgs$122k to everyone else

57 repeat relationships: 49 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 55 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

57
28

Total granted

$2.1M
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+26%

Still filing today

42%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionInternationalArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JV
    JEWISH VALUES INSTITUTE
    2× · 2019–2025 · $11k · revenue +89%
  • DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    3× · 2018–2022 · $6k · revenue +22%
  • BO
    Bonei Olam Inc
    5× · 2017–2021 · $5k · revenue +224%

Funded once

  • ST
    SARA TUGMAN BAIS CHA TORAH CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $16k
  • YG
    YESHIVA GEDOLA ATERES MORDECHAI
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
4
University of Judaism Foundation
—
5
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
6
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
8
Jewish Life Foundation
—
9
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
10
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
11
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
12
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Service; the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Baruch Umarpeh. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 143 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/50
Grantees still filing
22/50
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD CHAI CENTER: $1,749,500 · OtherBIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD CHAI CENTERYESHIVAS DARCHEI TORAH: $74,500 · Other+111 more: $330,081 · Other+111 moreAISH HATORAH DETROIT: $38,250 · ReligionJEWISH VALUES INSTITUTE: $11,000 · ReligionCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $3,500 · Religion+8 more: $3,086 · ReligionJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $26,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BARUCH UMARPEH: $4,080 · PhilanthropyZaka Tel-Aviv Inc: $1,540 · Philanthropy+3 more: $968 · PhilanthropyBonei Olam Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesDETROIT CHESED PROJECT: $2,180 · Human ServicesJARC: $1,300 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $360 · Human Services+1 more: $70 · Human ServicesDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $5,500 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $1,500 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC: $400 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $262 · Arts & CultureOholei Yosef Yitzchak Lubavitch: $3,560 · EducationHATZALAH OF MICHIGAN: $2,800 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$2,154,081Religion$55,836Philanthropy$32,588Human Services$8,910Arts & Culture$7,662Education$3,560Public Safety & Disaster$2,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAISH HATORAH DETROIT: $38,250 over 5y, 15% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $26,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BARUCH UMARPEH: $4,080 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetYAD EZRA: $3,960 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHATZALAH OF MICHIGAN: $2,800 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDETROIT CHESED PROJECT: $2,180 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetZaka Tel-Aviv Inc: $1,540 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJARC: $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MEIR PANIM: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYAD EZRA V'SHULAMIT: $840 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEED ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $680 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $360 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $360 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP HASC INC: $360 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS KICKING CANCER INC: $360 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH DENTAL CLINIC: $330 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $288 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH RESOURCE CENTER: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $172 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEBRON FUND INC: $108 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHABBOT SHALOM FAX OF LIFE INC: $108 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $108 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNoam Shabbos Inc: $90 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW ACADEMY OF CLEVELAND: $72 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKeren Simchas Chosson Ve Kallah: $70 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AISH HATORAH DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH VALUES INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BARUCH UMARPEH ↗
  • Who funds YAD EZRA ↗
  • Who funds Oholei Yosef Yitzchak Lubavitch ↗
  • Who funds CHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HATZALAH OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT CHESED PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds MIKVEH ISRAEL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Edward and Norma Jean Meer Charitable FoundationMI32.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Edward and Norma Jean Meer Charitable Foundation · Ahavas Avraham Foundation · United Jewish Foundation · The Meer Family Foundation · Seymor & Pearl Greenstein Foundation · The Irving and Ethel Palman Foundation · Harold and Penny B Blumenstein Foundation Corporation · Jewish Federation of Detroit · The Coville-Triest Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Alex Saltsman Family Foundation · Marvin Berlin Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Borsand Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Borsand Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Mesorah Heritage Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 143 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Borsand Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph