Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Marvin Berlin Foundation

$106k
Granted FY2023
20
Grants FY2023
9
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0183% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202023.

Religion$105kEducation$90kHealth$84kHuman Services$2kSocial Science$2kPhilanthropy$100International$100Civil Rights$100Other$0
02FY2023 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k15 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$300
Median grant
9
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Torah Prep School$50,000
Shaare Zedek Hospital$20,000
Congregation Shomrey Emunah$10,000
Yeshiva Beth Yehudah$10,000
Chabad Lubavitch$10,000
Talmudical Institute of Upstate New$2,000
Kids Kicking Cancer$1,500
Wounded Warrior Project$600
Congregation Mishkan Israel$320
TEP$300
Paralyzed Veterans of America$250
Yeshiva Darchai Torah$200
Bonei Olam$180
Women's Orthodox League$100
Birthright Israel Foundation$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $180) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Bonei Olam: $180 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
CT
MO
AZ
KS
TN
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$261k · 19 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +154% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
19

Total granted

$261k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+154%
+17%

Still filing today

21%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $1k · revenue +34%
  • TJ
    THE JEWISH DENTAL CLINIC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $250 · revenue +154%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $135 · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • SZ
    Share Zedek Hospital
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Physicians for Palestine
Health
2
Bonei Olam Division of Central Jersey Inc

Bonei Olam provides financial assistance,guidance & referrals for assisted reproductive technology,including consultations, work up, medications, high risk pregnancy,Preimplantation genetic diagnosis,pre & post…

International
3
Belev Echad Inc

Belev echad is an international nonprofit dedicated to restoring the wounded men and women of the idf back to life through physical, medical, legal, emotional, and financial support. our extensive therapies and programs help the soldiers…

Human Services
4
Bonei Olam Division of Borough Park Inc

Bonei Olam provides financial assistance,guidance & referrals for assisted reproductive technology,including consultations, work up, medications, high risk pregnancy,Preimplantation genetic diagnosis,pre & post…

International
5
The Bnai Jacob Foundation
6
Bonei Olam Division of Williamsburg Inc

Bonei Olam provides financial assistance,guidance & referrals for assisted reproductive technology,including consultations, work up, medications, high risk pregnancy,Preimplantation genetic diagnosis,pre & post…

International
7
Jewish Institute for the Blind (Jerusalem) Inc

To educate, enrich and empower visually impaired people across israel to achieve their full potential and become contributing members of society.

International
8
Sherit Isroel
9
Joint Israel

To help build a more just society by creating model programs for disadvantaged populations. The activities focus primarily on helping Israel overcome the challenges facing five groups (cont. on sched O):

International
10
Bonei Olam Division of Orange County Inc

Bonei Olam provides financial assistance,guidance & referrals for assisted reproductive technology,including consultations, work up, medications, high risk pregnancy,Preimplantation genetic diagnosis,pre & post…

International
11
Humanitarian Partnership for Israel

Providing financial assistance to needy individuals as well as to other charitable, educational, and religious organizations in israel and worldwide

Philanthropy
12
Bonei Olam Division of Rockland County

Bonei Olam provides financial assistance,guidance & referrals for assisted reproductive technology,including consultations, work up, medications, high risk pregnancy,Preimplantation genetic diagnosis,pre & post…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed Israel Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Paralyzed Veterans of America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Torah Prep School — $90,000 · OtherTorah Prep SchoolShaare Zedek Hospital — $60,000 · OtherShaare Zedek HospitalCongregation Shomrey Emunah — $40,850 · OtherCongregation Shomrey EmunahChabad Lubavitch — $30,000 · OtherChabad LubavitchYESHIVATH BETH YEHUDAH — $30,000 · OtherYESHIVATH BETH YEHUDAHShare Zedek Hospital — $20,000 · OtherShare Zedek HospitalIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · Other+30 more — $15,357 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $1,032 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc — $180 · Human ServicesPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $250 · HealthTHE JEWISH DENTAL CLINIC — $250 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $135 · HealthFEED ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $100 · PhilanthropyBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $100 · International
Other$296,207Human Services$1,212Health$635Philanthropy$100International$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $1,032 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH DENTAL CLINIC — $250 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBonei Olam Inc — $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $135 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMATAN BSETER — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA
  • Who funds THE JEWISH DENTAL CLINIC
  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds MATAN BSETER
  • Who funds FEED ISRAEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Edward and Norma Jean Meer Charitable FoundationMI20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Edward and Norma Jean Meer Charitable Foundation · Borsand Family Foundation Inc · United Jewish Foundation · The Meer Family Foundation · Ahavas Avraham Foundation · The Irving and Ethel Palman Foundation · Jewish Federation of Detroit · Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Marvin Berlin Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Marvin Berlin Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Marvin Berlin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph