Skip to content
Borrell Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Borrell Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$82k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

61% of Borrell Family Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Community Foundation Of Tampa Bay Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 7 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’19
2
’20
6
’21
10
’22
7
’23
7
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Philanthropy$293kEducation$51kArts & Culture$34kSocial Science$15kPublic Benefit$6kCommunity Improvement$5kHealth$5kFood & Nutrition$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
$1,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Community Foundation of Tampa Bay$25,024
Community Foundation of Tampa Bay$25,000
Florida Council of Economic Education$5,525
The Dali Museum$5,025
University of Tampa$5,025
University of Tampa$5,025
University of Tampa$5,024
Committee On Foreign Relations Tampa Bay$1,500
Humane Society of Tampa Bay$1,000
Palm Ciea Methodist Churcb$1,000
Metropolitan Ministries$1,000
Strazz Center$1,000
Tampa Museum of Art$505
Individual grant recipient$400
Gold Shield Foundation$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Metropolitan Ministries: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$94k · 12 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
19

Total granted

$94k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+68%

Still filing today

50%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentAnimalsPhilanthropySocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    The University of Tampa Incorporated
    6× · 2019–2024 · $49k · revenue +51%
  • SD
    SALVADOR DALI MUSEUM INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +36%
  • FC
    FLORIDA COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $15k · revenue +183%

Funded once

  • TT
    THE TAMPA BAY HISTORY CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue +18%
  • UO
    Univesity of S Florida Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • FC
    Florida Council of Economic Education
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tampa Museum of Art Foundation Inc

Maintain and raise funds for the benefit of the tampa museum of art, inc.

Arts & Culture
2
H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Hospital Inc

The primary purpose of the h. lee moffitt cancer center and research institute hospital, inc. ("hospital") is to contribute to the prevention and cure of cancer.

Health
3
The Museum of Fine Arts Houston

The museum of fine arts, houston serves as a welcoming and inclusive place for all people, connecting the communities of houston with diverse histories of art spanning 6,000 years and six continents. through our permanent collections,…

Arts & Culture
4
Grand Lodge of Florida Museum & Library Inc
—
5
The John & Mable Ringling Museum of Art Foundation Incorporated

The ringling is a place of art, architecture, and circus in an environment that inspires, educates, entertains, and honors the legacy of john & mable ringling.

Arts & Culture
6
The Jacksonville Historical Society Inc

The mission of the Jacksonville Historical Society is to strengthen citizenship through public history education.

—
7
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
8
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
9
BayCare Health System Inc

BAYCARE HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. (BCHS) WILL IMPROVE THE HEALTH OF ALL WE SERVE THROUGH COMMUNITY-OWNED HEALTH CARE SERVICES THAT SET THE STANDARD FOR HIGH-QUALITY, COMPASSIONATE CARE. BCHS is the best place to work, receive and provide care.…

Health
10
Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa Inc

The mission of the Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa a/k/a ZooTampa at Lowry Park, is to rescue, rehabilitate and care for animals.(Expanded mission on Schedule O)ZooTampa creates exceptional personalized experiences that connect…

Animals
11
Usf Research Foundation Inc

To promote, encourage and enhance research activities at the university of south florida.

Education
12
Florida Health Sciences Center Inc

As the region's leading safety net hospital, tampa general hospital is committed to providing area residents with excellent and compassionate health care ranging from the simplest to the most complex medical services. our shared purpose:…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc; the most unlike its peers is Gold Shield Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
15/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC: $287,441 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC+1 more: $250 · PhilanthropyThe University of Tampa Incorporated: $49,087 · EducationThe Universit…Special Operations Fund: $2,222 · EducationUnivesity of S Florida Foundation: $5,000 · OtherUnivesity o…Florida Council of Economic Education: $5,000 · OtherFlorida Cou…United Food Bank of Plant City: $3,700 · OtherUnited Food…Tampa Bay Commitee on Foreign Relations: $3,043 · OtherTampa Bay C…The Chislers: $2,500 · OtherThe Chisler…PALMA CEIA METHODIST CHURCH INC: $2,500 · OtherPALMA CEIA …Individual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherIndividual …Tampa Bay Council of Foreign Relationship: $2,200 · OtherJohn's Hopkin's Children's Hospital Foudatation: $2,000 · OtherSt Leo University: $1,520 · OtherCommittee On Foreign Relations Tampa Bay: $1,500 · OtherHumane Society of Tampa Bay Inc: $1,700 · Other+15 more: $10,368 · Other+15 moreSALVADOR DALI MUSEUM INC: $15,053 · Arts & CultureTAMPA MUSEUM OF ART INC: $2,905 · Arts & CultureRUTH ECKERD HALL INC: $1,800 · Arts & CultureFLORIDA COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION INC: $14,547 · Social ScienceTHE TAMPA BAY HISTORY CENTER: $12,601 · EnvironmentJOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · Health
Philanthropy$287,691Education$51,309Other$43,531Arts & Culture$19,758Social Science$14,547Environment$12,601Health$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC: $287,441 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe University of Tampa Incorporated: $49,087 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSALVADOR DALI MUSEUM INC: $15,053 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION INC: $14,547 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE TAMPA BAY HISTORY CENTER: $12,601 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTAMPA MUSEUM OF ART INC: $2,905 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSpecial Operations Fund: $2,222 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUTH ECKERD HALL INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society of Tampa Bay Inc: $1,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOLD SHIELD FOUNDATION INC: $800 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHAYWOOD COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD INC: $573 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTAMPA BAY RESEACH INSTITUTE: $523 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHISELERS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMasonic Home Endowment Fund Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds The University of Tampa Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds SALVADOR DALI MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TAMPA BAY HISTORY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TAMPA MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds Special Operations Fund ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RUTH ECKERD HALL INC ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society of Tampa Bay Inc ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds GOLD SHIELD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HAYWOOD COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD INC ↗
  • Who funds TAMPA BAY RESEACH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE CHISELERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Masonic Home Endowment Fund Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vinik Family Foundati…Publix Super Markets …Top Jewish Foundation…Pinellas Community Fo…Community Foundation …Beard Foundation IncThomas A & Mary S Jam…The Yerrid Foundation…Frank E Duckwall Foun…Chris T Sullivan Foun…Debartolo Family Foun…Raymond James Charita…
Vinik Family FoundationFL17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vinik Family Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Top Jewish Foundation Inc · Pinellas Community Foundation · Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Beard Foundation Inc · Thomas A & Mary S James Foundation · The Yerrid Foundation Inc · Frank E Duckwall Foundation · Chris T Sullivan Foundation Inc · Debartolo Family Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Borrell Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Borrell Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Metropolitan Ministries Inc: 1% of income from government
  • The University of Tampa Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Borrell Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home