Skip to content
Booth Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Booth Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$4.9M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$23MReligion$2.2MHealth$560kHousing & Shelter$555kArts & Culture$456kInternational$100kFood & Nutrition$28kCommunity Improvement$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $218k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $353k
  • $250k+3 grants · $5.9M
$15,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$89M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OUTREACH FOUNDATION OF FIRST PRESBY$4,925,123
FAMILY PROMISE OF MARTIN CO INC$555,000
JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER$375,000
PLACE OF HOPE$175,000
SAMARITANS PURSE$100,000
Individual grant recipient$78,000
ATLANTIC CLASSICAL ORCHESTRA$45,000
LOVE AND HOPE IN ACTION$25,000
HUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART$25,000
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL COLORADO FOUNDAT$15,000
CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION$15,000
CENTER FOR COMMUNITY STEWARDSHIP$15,000
HELPING PEOPLE SUCCEED$15,000
ONE LOVE COMMUNITY INC$15,000
THE ART FOUNDATION OF MC$13,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $202k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PLACE OF HOPE: $175k → 10%LOVE AND HOPE IN ACTION: $25k → 10%PLACE OF HOPE: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
CO
WV
VA
TN
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$21M · 6 repeat orgs$5.9M to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

$21M
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+102%

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionReligionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    The Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries
    3× · 2019–2021 · $2.2M · revenue +1%
  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $485k · revenue +72%
  • HM
    HUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART INC
    3× · 2019–2024 · $305k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • MH
    MARTIN HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • MC
    MARTIN COUNTY FIRE FIGHTERS
    one grant, 2021 · $200
  • FO
    FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE WEST PALM BEACH LODGE
    one grant, 2023 · $35 · revenue +102%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hospice of Martin & St Lucie Inc

Hospice of martin & st. lucie, inc. exists to provide hospice, grief counseling, education and other services to patients and families, dealing with death and dying so that they might live as fully and comfortably as possible. hospice…

Human Services
2
Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc

The mission of the Jupiter Medical Center Foundation, Inc. is to secure the financial resources required to sustain clinical excellence and quality of care at Jupiter Medical Center, Inc. & its affiliates.

Philanthropy
3
Hospice of the Treasure Coast Inc

Hospice of the treasure coast, inc. exists to provide hospice, grief counseling, education and other services to patients and families dealing with death and dying so that they might live as fully and comfortably as possible.

—
4
Jupiter Island Arts Council Inc

To enrich the quality of life by inspiring participation and appreciation through engagement of all ages with educational opportunities, presenting art forms, promoting artists and art groups, and guiding advancement of the arts in martin…

Arts & Culture
5
Camillus House Inc

Rooted in the compassionate hospitality of st. john of god, we improve the quality of life of those who are vulnerable and homeless in south florida through the provision of a continuum of housing and supportive services.

—
6
Jupiter Medical Center Physicians Group Inc

JMCPG is committed to providing compassionate, personalized care from the region's most trusted team of physicians and health care professionals. Across the Palm Beaches and the Treasure Coast of Florida, JMCPG practice locations offer…

Health
7
Gulf Coast Jewish Family and Community Services Inc

Inspired by jewish values, we protect the vulnerable, empower individuals and strengthen families. (continued on schedule o)

—
8
Floridas Love in Action
Human Services
9
Hope Helps Inc

To prevent and reduce hunger and homelessness in central florida by equipping individuals and families to become self-sufficient through housing, outreach, prevention, and education.

Human Services
10
Habitat for Humanity of Greater Palm Beach County

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
11
Hospice of Miami County Inc

The hospice of miami county, inc. is committed to making quality hospice care available and accessible to terminally ill persons and their families, regardless of ability pay, and in a manner consistent with the highest hospice standards.…

—
12
Volusiaflagler County Coalition for the Homeless Inc

Charitable or educational purposes related to services for persons experiencing homelessness and persons at risk of homelessness in the service area. in pursuance of the foregoing purposes, vfcch shall facilitate and coordinate the…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Love Community Inc; the most unlike its peers is James Whites Fort. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
7/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OUTREACH FOUNDATION OF FIRST PRESBYTERIAN: $17,808,403 · OtherOUTREACH FOUNDATION OF FIRST PRESBYTERIANOUTREACH FOUNDATION OF FIRST PRESBY: $4,925,123 · OtherOUTREACH FOUNDATION OF FIRST PRESBY+13 more: $748,235 · OtherThe Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries: $2,195,500 · PhilanthropyThe Rosse…Jupiter Medical Center Inc: $485,000 · Health+1 more: $15,000 · HealthHUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART INC: $305,000 · Arts & CultureATLANTIC CLASSICAL ORCHESTRA INC: $45,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $4,000 · Arts & CulturePLACE OF HOPE INC: $176,500 · Human ServicesLOVE AND HOPE IN ACTION INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $100,000 · ReligionONE LOVE COMMUNITY INC: $15,000 · Food & NutritionTREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC: $13,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$23,481,761Philanthropy$2,195,500Health$500,000Arts & Culture$354,000Human Services$201,500Religion$100,000Food & Nutrition$28,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries: $2,195,500 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Inc: $485,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART INC: $305,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetPLACE OF HOPE INC: $176,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTIC CLASSICAL ORCHESTRA INC: $45,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetLOVE AND HOPE IN ACTION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetHPS Helping People Succeed Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY STEWARDSHIP: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetONE LOVE COMMUNITY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetTREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC: $13,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUPITER POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetJAMES WHITES FORT: $3,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE ARTCENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable E…The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Booth Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Booth Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Treasure Coast Food Bank Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Jupiter Medical Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Lighthouse Artcenter Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Place of Hope Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Booth Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Booth Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Booth’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home