Skip to content

· Private foundation

Booker Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$619k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$406k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$1.0MEducation$747kRecreation & Sports$300kFood & Nutrition$175kCommunity Improvement$175kHealth$137kHuman Services$66kCrime & Legal$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $116k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $85k
  • $250k+1 grant · $406k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$7.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON$406,000
THE FIRST TEE OF GREATER HOUSTON$85,000
UNIVERSITY OF ST JOSEPH$25,000
100 CLUB OF HOUSTON$25,000
HOUSTON FOOD BANK$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
TEXAS GOLF HALL OF FAME$11,000
IMPACT MELANOMA$10,000
NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION$5,000
HOUSTON GOLF ASSOCIATION$5,000
JOHN COOPER SCHOOL$1,000
RED WHITE AND GREY FOUNDATION$880
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $20k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 19 repeat orgs$166k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
9

Total granted

$2.6M
$130k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+59%

Still filing today

63%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesReligionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HG
    Houston Golf Association Youth Program Inc dba First Tee of Greater Houston
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +51%
  • The Houston Food Bank
    7× · 2019–2025 · $155k · revenue +109%
  • TG
    TEXAS GOLF HALL OF FAME & MUSEUM
    7× · 2019–2025 · $115k · revenue ×18 · 44% of their budget

Funded once

  • MA
    MIKE AND PAT BOOKER MELANOMA ENDOWMENT MD ANDERSEN CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • UO
    UNIVERISTY OF ST JOSEPH
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • MP
    Memorial Park Conservancy Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Houston Municipal Golf Association Inc

The mission of the Houston Municipal Golf Association is to help the City of Houston create long-term cost savings and facility upgrades by managing and improving the city's golf courses. The organization is contracted to operate F.M Law…

Recreation & Sports
2
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
3
Trees for Houston

Plant, protect and promote trees all over the greater Houston area.

—
4
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

—
5
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
6
Foundation for Women's Cancer

To support and empower all affected by gynecologic cancers through education, research, and public awareness.

Health
7
National Comprehensive Cancer Network

To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.

Health
8
Harris County Medical Society

Our mission is to be the leading advocate for our member physicians, their patients and our community, in promoting the highest standards of ethical medical practice, access to quality medical care, medical education, research, and…

—
9
Honorhealth Ambulatory

Our mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve. our vision is to be the partner of choice as we transform healthcare for our communities. we will attain our vision through the following: -providing the highest…

Health
10
Memorial Hermann Medical Group

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
11
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
12
National Veterans Legal Services Program Inc

To provide at no cost legal assistance to veterans of the u.s. armed forces and current service members.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Joseph Center; the most unlike its peers is Bravo Colorado At Beaver Creek-Vail Inc Dba Bravo Vail Valley Music Festival. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
15/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON: $685,804 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF HOUSTONUNIVERSITY OF ST JOSEPH: $175,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ST JOSEPHThe Houston Food Bank: $155,000 · OtherThe Houston Food Bank100 CLUB OF HOUSTON: $125,000 · Other100 CLUB OF HOUSTONMIKE AND PAT BOOKER MELANOMA ENDOWMENT MD ANDERSEN CANCER CENTER: $50,000 · OtherUNIVERISTY OF ST JOSEPH: $50,000 · OtherTGA FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherTGA ASSOCIATION: $50,000 · Other+11 more: $119,280 · Other+11 moreHouston Golf Association Youth Program Inc dba First Tee of Greater Houston: $1,038,000 · Recreation & SportsHouston Golf Association Youth Program In…+1 more: $7,250 · Recreation & SportsTEXAS GOLF HALL OF FAME & MUSEUM (AUDIT): $114,500 · Arts & CultureBRAVO COLORADO AT BEAVER CREEK-VAIL INC DBA BRAVO VAIL VALLEY MUSIC FESTIVAL: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE VAIL JAZZ FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureLUKE'S WINGS: $35,000 · HealthSEYMOUR PINKINC: $17,000 · HealthTHE PULMONARY HYPERTENSION ASSOCIATION INC: $12,500 · HealthIMPACT MELANOMA INC: $10,000 · HealthNational Law Enforcement and Firefighters Childrens Foundation: $60,000 · Crime & LegalST JOSEPH CENTER: $30,000 · Human ServicesMemorial Park Conservancy Inc: $10,000 · EnvironmentCANCARE INC: $2,000 · Religion
Other$1,460,084Recreation & Sports$1,045,250Arts & Culture$139,500Health$74,500Crime & Legal$60,000Human Services$30,000Environment$10,000Religion$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHouston Golf Association Youth Program Inc dba First Tee of Greater Houston: $1,038,000 over 9y, 16% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $155,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS GOLF HALL OF FAME & MUSEUM (AUDIT): $114,500 over 7y, 44% of budgetNational Law Enforcement and Firefighters Childrens Foundation: $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLUKE'S WINGS: $35,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetST JOSEPH CENTER: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEYMOUR PINKINC: $17,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetTHE PULMONARY HYPERTENSION ASSOCIATION INC: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBRAVO COLORADO AT BEAVER CREEK-VAIL INC DBA BRAVO VAIL VALLEY MUSIC FESTIVAL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMemorial Park Conservancy Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE VAIL JAZZ FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetHouston Golf Association Inc: $7,250 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetThe John Cooper School: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCANCARE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Houston Golf Association Youth Program Inc dba First Tee of Greater Houston ↗
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS GOLF HALL OF FAME & MUSEUM (AUDIT) ↗
  • Who funds National Law Enforcement and Firefighters Childrens Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LUKE'S WINGS ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
  • Who funds SEYMOUR PINKINC ↗
  • Who funds THE PULMONARY HYPERTENSION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT MELANOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds BRAVO COLORADO AT BEAVER CREEK-VAIL INC DBA BRAVO VAIL VALLEY MUSIC FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds Memorial Park Conservancy Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE VAIL JAZZ FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Houston Golf Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The John Cooper School ↗
  • Who funds CANCARE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albert and Margaret Alkek FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albert and Margaret Alkek Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Booker Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Booker Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Impact Melanoma Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Booker Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph