Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bonhomme Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$113kReligion$45kInternational$25kEducation$19kHuman Services$15kHealth$6kCrime & Legal$1kFood & Nutrition$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$523
Median grant
2
States reached
$134k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF LOUISVILLE$7,000
KENESETH ISRAEL CONGREGATION$6,911
METRO UNITED WAY$6,000
EDUCATIONAL JUSTICE$1,025
CONGREGATION ADATH JESHURUN$680
Individual grant recipient$523
HALTER$500
LOUISVILLE CENTRAL COMMUNITY CENTER$500
WEST END SCHOOL$500
SHRINERS HOSPITAL - GREENVILLE SC$500
CONGREGATION ANSHEI SFARD$400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BELEV ECHAD: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
KY
VA
KS
TN
NC
SC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$111k · 18 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
17

Total granted

$111k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+15%

Still filing today

56%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationInternationalRecreation & SportsHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $7k · revenue +47%
  • EJ
    EDUCATIONAL JUSTICE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +85%
  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGE MITZVAH FUND INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $4k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    one grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue -33%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -51%
  • BE
    BELEV ECHAD INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
The Jewish Foundation of Cincinnati
Philanthropy
3
Jewish Federation of Cincinnati

The Jewish Federation of Cincinnati develops and connects leaders, contributors, organizations, and ideas to build an inclusive Jewish community that helps people in need, supports Israel, and assures a vibrant Jewish future.

Philanthropy
4
Jewish Federation of St Louis

Jewish federation of st. louis mobilizes the jewish community and its human and financial resources to preserve and enhance jewish life in st. louis, in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
5
Avodah the Jewish Service Corps Inc

Avodah develops lifelong social justice leaders whose work is informed by jewish values and who inspire the jewish community to work toward a more just and equitable world.

Community Improvement
6
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
7
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
8
Richmond Jewish Foundation

The Richmond Jewish Foundation is a primary, trusted and expert resource for planned giving and endowments. We engage, educate and inspire generations of donors to create ongoing resources for charitable, religious, and educational needs.…

Philanthropy
9
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
10
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
11
Bureau of Jewish Education of Greater Los Angeles Inc

Bje enhances the quality of, increases access to, and encourages participation in jewish education throughout the jewish communities of greater los angeles. bje is an advocate, planner, catalyst, and creative leader for strengthening and…

Religion
12
Board of Jewish Education Inc

The organization works to inspire and empower educators and institutions to create transformative jewish learning experiences for children, teens, and families. building on its historic role serving jewish day schools, congregations, and…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community of Louisville Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Tikvah Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNITY OF LOUISVILLE INC: $81,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY OF LOUISVILLE INCMETRO UNITED WAY INC: $31,000 · PhilanthropyMETRO UNITED WAY INC+1 more: $616 · PhilanthropyKENESETH ISRAEL: $27,707 · OtherKENESETH ISRAELMONTESSORI TORAH ACADEMY: $10,000 · OtherMONTESSORI TORAH ACADEMYBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL: $4,500 · OtherBIRTHRIGHT ISRAELCONGREGATION ADATH JESHURUN: $3,882 · OtherCONGREGATION ADATH JESHURUNHALTER (HEALING AND LEARNING THROUGH EQUINE RELATIONSHIPS): $2,500 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITAL - GREENVILLE SC: $2,500 · Other+17 more: $11,745 · Other+17 moreFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $13,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF …AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $10,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FR…MIDDLE EAST FORUM: $1,000 · InternationalTHE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC: $6,900 · Human ServicesBELEV ECHAD INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesEDUCATIONAL JUSTICE INC: $5,091 · EducationWest End School Inc: $2,525 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationJEWISH HERITAGE MITZVAH FUND INC: $4,000 · ReligionLOUISVILLE CENTRAL COMMUNITY CENTERINC: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsTHE FILSON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $550 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$112,616Other$62,834International$24,000Human Services$12,900Education$7,716Religion$4,000Recreation & Sports$3,050

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY OF LOUISVILLE INC: $81,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMETRO UNITED WAY INC: $31,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $13,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC: $6,900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEDUCATIONAL JUSTICE INC: $5,091 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBELEV ECHAD INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE MITZVAH FUND INC: $4,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetWest End School Inc: $2,525 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHALTER (HEALING AND LEARNING THROUGH EQUINE RELATIONSHIPS): $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLOUISVILLE CENTRAL COMMUNITY CENTERINC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMIDDLE EAST FORUM: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN IRELAND FUND (DBA THE IRELAND FUNDS AMERICA/THE IRELAND FUNDS): $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER FOR COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTISBEST PHILANTHROPY: $616 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FILSON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TIKVAH FUND: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY OF LOUISVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds METRO UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATIONAL JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds BELEV ECHAD INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH HERITAGE MITZVAH FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds West End School Inc ↗
  • Who funds HALTER (HEALING AND LEARNING THROUGH EQUINE RELATIONSHIPS) ↗
  • Who funds LOUISVILLE CENTRAL COMMUNITY CENTERINC ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLE EAST FORUM ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN IRELAND FUND (DBA THE IRELAND FUNDS AMERICA/THE IRELAND FUNDS) ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds CANCER FOR COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
  • Who funds TISBEST PHILANTHROPY ↗
  • Who funds THE FILSON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TIKVAH FUND ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Louisville IncKY19.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Jewish Heritage Fund for Excellence Inc · Charles L Weisberg Family Foundation · The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Brown-Forman Foundation · Julia & Isadore Klein Family Foundation Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Rudd Foundation Inc · Isadore & Rose Goldstein Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bonhomme Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bonhomme Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bonhomme’s filings →

    More from the funding graph