Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bonhomme Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Philanthropy$113kReligion$45kInternational$25kEducation$19kHuman Services$15kHealth$6kCrime & Legal$1kFood & Nutrition$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$523
Median grant
2
States reached
$134k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF LOUISVILLE$7,000
KENESETH ISRAEL CONGREGATION$6,911
METRO UNITED WAY$6,000
EDUCATIONAL JUSTICE$1,025
CONGREGATION ADATH JESHURUN$680
Individual grant recipient$523
LOUISVILLE CENTRAL COMMUNITY CENTER$500
WEST END SCHOOL$500
HALTER$500
SHRINERS HOSPITAL - GREENVILLE SC$500
CONGREGATION ANSHEI SFARD$400
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BELEV ECHAD: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
KY
VA
KS
TN
NC
SC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$111k · 18 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
17

Total granted

$111k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+15%

Still filing today

56%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationInternationalRecreation & SportsHealthPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $7k · revenue +47%
  • EJ
    EDUCATIONAL JUSTICE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +85%
  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGE MITZVAH FUND INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $4k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    one grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue -33%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -51%
  • BE
    BELEV ECHAD INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

2
The Jewish Foundation of Cincinnati
Philanthropy
3
Jewish Federation of Cincinnati

The Jewish Federation of Cincinnati develops and connects leaders, contributors, organizations, and ideas to build an inclusive Jewish community that helps people in need, supports Israel, and assures a vibrant Jewish future.

Philanthropy
4
Jewish Federation of St Louis

Jewish federation of st. louis mobilizes the jewish community and its human and financial resources to preserve and enhance jewish life in st. louis, in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
5
Avodah the Jewish Service Corps Inc

Avodah develops lifelong social justice leaders whose work is informed by jewish values and who inspire the jewish community to work toward a more just and equitable world.

Community Improvement
6
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
7
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
8
Richmond Jewish Foundation

The Richmond Jewish Foundation is a primary, trusted and expert resource for planned giving and endowments. We engage, educate and inspire generations of donors to create ongoing resources for charitable, religious, and educational needs.…

Philanthropy
9
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
10
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
11
Bureau of Jewish Education of Greater Los Angeles Inc

Bje enhances the quality of, increases access to, and encourages participation in jewish education throughout the jewish communities of greater los angeles. bje is an advocate, planner, catalyst, and creative leader for strengthening and…

Religion
12
Board of Jewish Education Inc

The organization works to inspire and empower educators and institutions to create transformative jewish learning experiences for children, teens, and families. building on its historic role serving jewish day schools, congregations, and…

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community of Louisville Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Tikvah Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community FederationsCancer Support OrganizationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionCommunity Arts OrganizationsGovernment Accountability R…Food Pantries & AssistanceUnited Way FederationsDomestic Violence Crisis Se…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%4%<5yr14%4%5–10yr18%20%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr14%16%35–55yr18%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr18%7%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr14%13%35–55yr18%60%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
12%
2,432/20,292

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNITY OF LOUISVILLE INC — $81,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY OF LOUISVILLE INCMETRO UNITED WAY INC — $31,000 · PhilanthropyMETRO UNITED WAY INC+1 more — $616 · PhilanthropyKENESETH ISRAEL — $27,707 · OtherKENESETH ISRAELMONTESSORI TORAH ACADEMY — $10,000 · OtherMONTESSORI TORAH ACADEMYBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL — $4,500 · OtherBIRTHRIGHT ISRAELCONGREGATION ADATH JESHURUN — $3,882 · OtherCONGREGATION ADATH JESHURUNHALTER (HEALING AND LEARNING THROUGH EQUINE RELATIONSHIPS) — $2,500 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITAL - GREENVILLE SC — $2,500 · Other+17 more — $11,745 · Other+17 moreFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $13,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF …AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $10,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FR…MIDDLE EAST FORUM — $1,000 · InternationalTHE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC — $6,900 · Human ServicesBELEV ECHAD INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesEDUCATIONAL JUSTICE INC — $5,091 · EducationWest End School Inc — $2,525 · Education+1 more — $100 · EducationJEWISH HERITAGE MITZVAH FUND INC — $4,000 · ReligionLOUISVILLE CENTRAL COMMUNITY CENTERINC — $2,500 · Recreation & SportsTHE FILSON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $550 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$112,616Other$62,834International$24,000Human Services$12,900Education$7,716Religion$4,000Recreation & Sports$3,050

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY OF LOUISVILLE INC — $81,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMETRO UNITED WAY INC — $31,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $13,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC — $6,900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEDUCATIONAL JUSTICE INC — $5,091 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBELEV ECHAD INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE MITZVAH FUND INC — $4,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetWest End School Inc — $2,525 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLOUISVILLE CENTRAL COMMUNITY CENTERINC — $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHALTER (HEALING AND LEARNING THROUGH EQUINE RELATIONSHIPS) — $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN IRELAND FUND (DBA THE IRELAND FUNDS AMERICA/THE IRELAND FUNDS) — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMIDDLE EAST FORUM — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER FOR COLLEGE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTISBEST PHILANTHROPY — $616 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FILSON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TIKVAH FUND — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY OF LOUISVILLE INC
  • Who funds METRO UNITED WAY INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC
  • Who funds EDUCATIONAL JUSTICE INC
  • Who funds BELEV ECHAD INC
  • Who funds JEWISH HERITAGE MITZVAH FUND INC
  • Who funds West End School Inc
  • Who funds LOUISVILLE CENTRAL COMMUNITY CENTERINC
  • Who funds HALTER (HEALING AND LEARNING THROUGH EQUINE RELATIONSHIPS)
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN IRELAND FUND (DBA THE IRELAND FUNDS AMERICA/THE IRELAND FUNDS)
  • Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC
  • Who funds MIDDLE EAST FORUM
  • Who funds CANCER FOR COLLEGE
  • Who funds TISBEST PHILANTHROPY
  • Who funds THE FILSON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds THE TIKVAH FUND
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Louisville IncKY19.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Jewish Heritage Fund for Excellence Inc · Charles L Weisberg Family Foundation · The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Brown-Forman Foundation · Julia & Isadore Klein Family Foundation Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Rudd Foundation Inc · Isadore & Rose Goldstein Family Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bonhomme Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph