Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bon Eau Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$251k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$151k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$1.2MFood & Nutrition$529kEnvironment$425kInternational$375kReligion$250kEducation$176kArts & Culture$50kHousing & Shelter$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $44k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $207k
$56,820
Median grant
4
States reached
$140k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUMMIT SCHOOL DISTRICT$150,606
CARITAS FAMILY SOLUTIONS$56,820
EASTER SEALS - SARASOTA$23,800
HOUSES ON THE MOON$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $319k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CARITAS FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $57k → 16%MIND & LIFE INSTITUTE: $215k → 8%CARITAS FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $47k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
OR
CT
CO
MO
VA
KS
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Bon Eau Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Bon Eau Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 12% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 10 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
11

Total granted

$2.1M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
-3%

Still filing today

40%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $151k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalFood & NutritionArts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FA
    FEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $109k · revenue +37%
  • CS
    CHRISTIAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $104k · revenue +12%
  • EMBRACING OUR DIFFERENCES INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $15k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • TI
    TERGAR INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue +20%
  • ML
    MIND & LIFE INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2021 · $215k · revenue -32%
  • HT
    HEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue +23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
4
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management Inc I

To end hunger and advance sustainable development by 2030 through science and innovation to transform food, land and water systems with aquatic foods for healthier people and planet.

—
8
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
10
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
11
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
12
Center for International Environmental Law Inc

To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Good Food Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Macoupin Art Collective. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOSTER CARE COALITION: $815,757 · OtherFOSTER CARE COALITIONIndividual grant recipient: $282,309 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTERGAR INTERNATIONAL: $250,000 · OtherTERGAR INTERNATIONALEASTER SEALS - SARASOTA: $202,192 · OtherEASTER SEALS - SARASOTASUMMIT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $150,606 · OtherSUMMIT SCHOOL DISTRICTMEALS ON WHEELS SARASOTA: $137,169 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS SARASOTAMEDICINS SANS FRONTIERES: $75,000 · Other+3 more: $85,672 · OtherRAINFOREST TRUST: $325,000 · InternationalRAINFOREST TRUSTHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC: $150,000 · InternationalHEART TO HEART INTERN…Save The Children Federation Inc: $150,000 · InternationalSave The Children Fed…MIND & LIFE INSTITUTE: $215,300 · Human ServicesMIND & LIF…CHRISTIAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS: $104,170 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN …THE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC: $110,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC: $109,000 · Food & NutritionOCEANA INC: $100,000 · EnvironmentMacoupin Art Collective: $35,000 · Arts & CultureEMBRACING OUR DIFFERENCES INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureUniversity of Miami: $25,000 · EducationALL STAR CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,998,705International$625,000Human Services$319,470Food & Nutrition$219,000Environment$100,000Arts & Culture$50,000Education$25,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRAINFOREST TRUST: $325,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTERGAR INTERNATIONAL: $250,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetMIND & LIFE INSTITUTE: $215,300 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC: $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC: $110,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC: $109,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS: $104,170 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOCEANA INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMacoupin Art Collective: $35,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMBRACING OUR DIFFERENCES INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetALL STAR CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bon Eau Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bon Eau Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bon Eau Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Bon Eau Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bon Eau’s filings →

More from the funding graph