Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bodenhamer Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$342k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$932kEnvironment$224kArts & Culture$175kRecreation & Sports$168kHealth$150kHousing & Shelter$117kHuman Services$58kFood & Nutrition$31kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $74k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $143k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION$125,000
THE ACCESS FUND$25,000
RAZORBACK FOUNDATION$20,000
NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR$20,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY$15,000
HO'OLA NA PUA$13,000
WASHINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUND$10,000
FOOD BANK OF LARIMER COUNTY$10,000
FAYETTEVILLE PUBLIC EDUC FOUNDATION$10,000
UNIV OF ARK FOR MEDICAL SCIENCE$10,000
AMERICAN ALPINE CLUB$10,000
SINGLE PARENT SCHOLARSHIP FD NWA$7,500
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE PARK & REC FD$7,500
Individual grant recipient$6,000
HOPE CANCER RESOURCES$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%WASHINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDAT: $10k → 14%WASHINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDAT: $10k → 14%WASHINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDAT: $10k → 14%WASHINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDAT: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
AZ
AR
HI
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 38 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

38 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
11

Total granted

$1.8M
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+220%

Still filing today

42%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $683k · revenue +52%
  • NT
    NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $112k · revenue +434%
  • HN
    HO'OLA NA PUA
    6× · 2020–2025 · $58k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • WJ
    WOODLAND JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL BAND
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • CA
    Community Affordable Residences Enterprise Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +334%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rogue Climate

Rogue Climate's mission is to empower Southern Oregon communities most impacted by climate change including low-income, rural, youth, seniors & communities of color, to win climate justice by organizing for clean energy, sustainable jobs &…

Education
2
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
3
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
4
Cowiche Canyon Conservancy

Protecting our shrub-steppe and connecting people to this vanishing landscape.

—
5
Aspen Valley Land Trust

Protecting the open land and special places of the roaring fork and middle colorado river valleys for wildlife, agriculture, and community forever.

Environment
6
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
7
Summit Land Conservancy

Summit land conservancy works with utah communities to conserve land and water for the benefit of the people and nature.

Environment
8
Public Land Solutions

Public land solutions is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing comprehensive recreation planning and stakeholder coordination to support effective and sustainable public land solutions.

Environment
9
Maine Appalachian Trail Land Trust

To preserve and protect land surrounding the appalachian trail in maine for public benefit.

Environment
10
American River Conservancy

To conduct land conservation, stewardship and education in the upper american river and upper cosumnes river watersheds

Environment
11
Wild Rockies Field Institute Inc

To broaden the nature of a liberal arts education; teach critical thinking about social & environmental issues; foster understanding of & respect for natural & human communities; & cultivate a sense of place that encourages personal,…

Education
12
Conservation Legacy

Conservation legacy engages future leaders who protect, restore, and enhance our nation's lands through community-based service.in 2024, conservation legacy engaged 2,524 participants who completed over 1.5 million service hours on public…

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The American Alpine Club; the most unlike its peers is Routt County Riders. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC: $682,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INCRAZORBACK FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · EducationFAYETTEVILLE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 · Education+3 more: $22,500 · EducationTHE ACCESS FUND: $115,000 · OtherTHE ACCESS FUNDTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $88,750 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYCARNEGIE LIBRARY RENOVATION: $50,000 · OtherCARNEGIE LIBRARY RENOVATIONCHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY CAMP WAPIYAPI: $42,500 · OtherCHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY CAMP WAPIYAPITHE AMERICAN ALPINE CLUB: $42,500 · OtherTHE AMERICAN ALPINE CLUBUNIVERSITY OF ARK FOR MED SCIENCE: $40,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARK FOR MED SCIENCEUNIV OF ARK FOR MEDICAL SCIENCE: $30,000 · Other+32 more: $295,000 · Other+32 moreTHEATRE SQUARED INC: $87,500 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF DISCOVERY: $40,000 · Arts & CultureOff the Hook Arts: $11,000 · Arts & CultureNEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC: $111,500 · Housing & ShelterCommunity Affordable Residences Enterprise Inc: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterHO'OLA NA PUA: $58,000 · Human ServicesWashington Regional Medical Foundation: $40,000 · Human ServicesThe Food Bank for Larimer County: $30,000 · Food & NutritionHope Cancer Resources: $26,780 · HealthSPASTIC PARAPLEGIA FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · Health
Education$782,500Other$703,750Arts & Culture$138,500Housing & Shelter$116,500Human Services$98,000Food & Nutrition$30,000Health$28,780

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC: $682,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ACCESS FUND: $115,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetNEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC: $111,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $88,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHEATRE SQUARED INC: $87,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetHO'OLA NA PUA: $58,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE AMERICAN ALPINE CLUB: $42,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMUSEUM OF DISCOVERY: $40,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWashington Regional Medical Foundation: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetRAZORBACK FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFAYETTEVILLE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetThe Food Bank for Larimer County: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHope Cancer Resources: $26,780 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetOzark Off Road Cyclists: $20,000 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetROUTT COUNTY RIDERS: $20,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetOff the Hook Arts: $11,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetMOUNT SEQUOYAH CENTER INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Affordable Residences Enterprise Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE POUDRE RIVER WATERSHED: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSALT LAKE CLIMBERS ALLIANCE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSPASTIC PARAPLEGIA FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LEARNING COUNCIL: $1,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPOUDRE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ACCESS FUND ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THEATRE SQUARED INC ↗
  • Who funds HO'OLA NA PUA ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN ALPINE CLUB ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF DISCOVERY ↗
  • Who funds Washington Regional Medical Foundation ↗
  • Who funds RAZORBACK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAYETTEVILLE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Food Bank for Larimer County ↗
  • Who funds Hope Cancer Resources ↗
  • Who funds Ozark Off Road Cyclists ↗
  • Who funds ROUTT COUNTY RIDERS ↗
  • Who funds Off the Hook Arts ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT SEQUOYAH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Affordable Residences Enterprise Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR22.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Colorado Gives Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Colorado · Wal-Mart Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Willard & Pat Walker Charitable Foundation Inc · Otter Cares Foundation AKA OTTERCARES FOUNDATION · Walton Family Foundation Inc · American Electric Power Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bodenhamer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bodenhamer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bodenhamer Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bodenhamer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bodenhamer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph