Skip to content

Colorado · Private foundation

Bodenhamer Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$342k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
31
Grants FY2025
30
Organizations funded FY2024
37%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$125,000
Organizations funded a year
22 to 30
FY2020 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
7
Total assets, FY2025
$5.5M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 37% of the organizations Bodenhamer Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 23% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $72k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsReligionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving30$327k13%
FY202430$308k37%
FY202327$285k19%
FY202224$313k13%
FY202123$323k35%
FY202022$254kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$932kEnvironment$224kArts & Culture$175kRecreation & Sports$168kHealth$150kHousing & Shelter$117kHuman Services$58kFood & Nutrition$31kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
AZ
AR
HI

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 24 grantees
All grantees of Bodenhamer Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
University of Arkansas Foundation Inc$682,50060%
The Access Fund$115,00061%
Neighbor to Neighbor Inc$111,50060%
Theatre Squared Inc$87,50060%
Ho'Ola Na Pua$58,00060%
The American Alpine Club$42,50060%
Museum of Discovery$40,00021%
Washington Regional Medical Foundation$40,00040%
Razorback Foundation Inc$40,00030%
Fayetteville Public Education Foundation Inc$37,50061%
The Food Bank for Larimer County$30,00020%
Hope Cancer Resources$26,78060%
Ozark Off Road Cyclists$20,00044%
Routt County Riders$20,00043%
City of Fort Collins$15,0003n/a
Off the Hook Arts$11,00052%
Mount Sequoyah Center Inc$7,50020%
Community Affordable Residences Enterprise Inc$5,00010%
Coalition for the Poudre River Watershed$5,00010%
Fayetteville School District #1$5,0001n/a
Salt Lake Climbers Alliance Inc$3,00011%
Spastic Paraplegia Foundation Inc$2,00010%
The Learning Council$1,50011%
Planting Justice$1,0001n/a

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 29 recipients with no EIN on record ($401k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Bodenhamer Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Arkansas Foundation Inc: $682,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Access Fund: $115,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetNeighbor to Neighbor Inc: $111,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTheatre Squared Inc: $87,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetHo'Ola Na Pua: $58,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetThe American Alpine Club: $42,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMuseum of Discovery: $40,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWashington Regional Medical Foundation: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetRazorback Foundation Inc: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFayetteville Public Education Foundation Inc: $37,500 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetThe Food Bank for Larimer County: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHope Cancer Resources: $26,780 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetOzark Off Road Cyclists: $20,000 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetRoutt County Riders: $20,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetOff the Hook Arts: $11,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetMount Sequoyah Center Inc: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Affordable Residences Enterprise Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCoalition for the Poudre River Watershed: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSalt Lake Climbers Alliance Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSpastic Paraplegia Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Learning Council: $1,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 21.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR22.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Colorado Gives Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Colorado · Wal-Mart Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Willard & Pat Walker Charitable Foundation Inc · Otter Cares Foundation AKA OTTERCARES FOUNDATION · Walton Family Foundation Inc · American Electric Power Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Bodenhamer Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bodenhamer Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Bodenhamer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Bodenhamer Foundation

How much does Bodenhamer Foundation give?
Bodenhamer Foundation reported 31 grants totaling $342,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 22 and 30 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2024.
What does Bodenhamer Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (49%), Environment (12%), Arts & Culture (9%).
Who are Bodenhamer Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: University of Arkansas Foundation Inc ($683k), The Access Fund ($115k), Neighbor to Neighbor Inc ($112k).
Does Bodenhamer Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 37% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Bodenhamer Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Bodenhamer Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Arkansas Community Foundation Inc, Colorado Gives Foundation, Community Foundation of Northern Colorado.
Where is Bodenhamer Foundation based?
Bodenhamer Foundation is based in CO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bodenhamer’s filings →

More from the funding graph