Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Bock Family Foundation Inc

Support government & non-profit organizations

$243k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Youth Development$143kHuman Services$137kEducation$104kEnvironment$96kHealth$78kRecreation & Sports$58kFood & Nutrition$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$46kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 12 grants below total $147,708 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $243,290 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $95,582 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $125k
$11,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PACES SCHOOL PROGRAM$18,500
CITY OF PERRY$18,400
PERRY AREA FOOD COUNCIL$17,000
Individual grant recipient$14,308
PERRY AREA CHILD DEVELOPMENT$14,200
EVERYBODY WINS IOWA INC$11,500
WOODWARD FOOD PANTRY$11,000
PERRY COMMUNITY SCHOOLS$10,300
INSIDE OUT WELLNESS & ADVOCAC$10,000
PERRY LITTLE LEAGUE$8,000
Individual grant recipient$7,500
DALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDA$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $121k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PERRY AREA CHILD DEV: $15k → 5%PERRY AREA CHILD DEVELOPMENT: $14k → 5%PERRY AREA CHILD DEV: $14k → 5%PERRY AREA CHILD DEV: $13k → 5%PERRY AREA CHILD DEVELOPMENT: $12k → 5%PERRY AREA CHILD DEV: $11k → 5%PERRY AREA CHILD DEV: $11k → 5%PERRY AREA CHILD DEV: $11k → 5%PERRY AREA CHILD DEVELOPMENT: $11k → 5%NEW OPPORTUNITIES INC: $9k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$705k · 13 repeat orgs$150k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
12

Total granted

$705k
$96k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-35%
+24%

Still filing today

31%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    Perry Community School District
    8× · 2017–2025 · $145k
  • DC
    DALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $143k
  • PA
    PERRY AREA CHILD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $111k · revenue -35%

Funded once

  • LH
    Lutheran Home for the Aged Association - West
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +2%
  • CO
    COMMUNITY OPPORTUNITIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $9k · revenue +27%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF HOTEL PATTEE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $9k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Prairie Care Operating Company
Human Services
2
Drop Inn Ministries - Iowa

The organization assists individuals and families with economic hardships.

Religion
3
Wiese Foundation

Support of six nonprofit beneficiaries

Philanthropy
4
Prairie View Management Inc

Our mission is to provide quality recovery through person-centered guidance.

Health
5
Greater Des Moines Partnership Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Dell Rapids Community Hospital Foundation

Support health care services

Philanthropy
7
Heart Song Inc

Provide adult day center and senior center for older adults in southeast iowa.

Human Services
8
Washington Economic Development Group

Coordinate area economic development

Community Improvement
9
Apple Daycare Inc

Provide a well rounded, affordable and dependable daycare facility for parents with children growing up in a rural north iowa area.

Human Services
10
Prairiecare Fund
Philanthropy
11
Idaho Elks Rehab Hospital Inc
Health
12
Perry County Services Inc

Provide support services to developmentally disabled individuals of perry county,missouri through areas of community employment, job preparation, day programs, transportation and personal assistance.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Good Samaritan Food Pantry Inc and the most unlike its peers is Genesis Development. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/13
Grantees still filing
5/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Perry Community School District — $145,125 · OtherPerry Community School DistrictDALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL — $142,531 · OtherDALLAS COUNTY HOSPITALPERRY PUBLIC LIBRARY — $59,051 · OtherPERRY PUBLIC LIBRARYPERRY AREA EMERGENCY FOOD COUNCIL — $31,500 · OtherPERRY AREA EMERGENCY FOOD COUNCILIndividual grant recipient — $25,000 · Other+17 more — $177,329 · Other+17 morePERRY AREA CHILD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $111,480 · Human ServicesPERRY AREA CHILD…COMMUNITY OPPORTUNITIES INC — $9,328 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY OPPORT…DALLAS COUNTY CONSERVATION FOUNDATION — $81,393 · EnvironmentDALLAS COU…PERRY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INC — $31,000 · Community ImprovementINSIDE OUT WELLNESS AND ADVOCACY — $10,000 · HealthPerry Alano Club — $8,545 · HealthEVERYBODY WINS - IOWA — $11,500 · EducationLutheran Home for the Aged Association - West — $10,339 · Housing & Shelter
Other$580,536Human Services$120,808Environment$81,393Community Improvement$31,000Health$18,545Education$11,500Housing & Shelter$10,339

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPERRY AREA CHILD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $111,480 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetDALLAS COUNTY CONSERVATION FOUNDATION — $81,393 over 5y, 27% of budgetPERRY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INC — $31,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetGENESIS DEVELOPMENT — $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYBODY WINS - IOWA — $11,500 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetLutheran Home for the Aged Association - West — $10,339 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINSIDE OUT WELLNESS AND ADVOCACY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY OPPORTUNITIES INC — $9,328 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF HOTEL PATTEE INC — $8,750 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetHOMECARE SERVICES INC OF DALLAS COUNTY — $8,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN FOOD PANTRY INC — $7,500 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetDALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $7,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PERRY AREA CHILD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
  • Who funds DALLAS COUNTY CONSERVATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PERRY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INC
  • Who funds GENESIS DEVELOPMENT
  • Who funds EVERYBODY WINS - IOWA
  • Who funds Lutheran Home for the Aged Association - West
  • Who funds INSIDE OUT WELLNESS AND ADVOCACY
  • Who funds COMMUNITY OPPORTUNITIES INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF HOTEL PATTEE INC
  • Who funds Perry Alano Club
  • Who funds HOMECARE SERVICES INC OF DALLAS COUNTY
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN FOOD PANTRY INC
  • Who funds DALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community FdnIA25.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Raccoon Valley Bank Charitable Foundation · United Way of Central Iowa · Wiese Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bock Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bock Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Bock Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph