Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bocholt Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$74k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Recreation & Sports$116kInternational$50kEducation$44kArts & Culture$36kReligion$25kFood & Nutrition$17kHealth$15kHuman Services$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VERSAILLES HERITAGE PARK FUND$29,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
VERSAILLES SCHOOL DISTRICT$13,500
TOWNE & COUNTRY PLAYERS$11,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$310k · 9 repeat orgs$96k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +106% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
15

Total granted

$310k
$96k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+106%
+33%

Still filing today

67%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationFood & NutritionPublic Safety & DisasterHealthHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VH
    VERSAILLES HERITAGE PARK FUND
    2× · 2023–2024 · $114k · revenue +106% · 44% of their budget
  • VM
    VERSAILLES MUSIC BOOSTERS
    6× · 2017–2023 · $19k · revenue +22%
  • HO
    HOUSE OF BREAD
    2× · 2018–2020 · $15k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • VC
    VERSAILLES COUNCIL OF CHURCHES INC
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • VS
    VERSAILLES SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • TR
    TEAM RUBICON INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western Reserve Land Conservancy

Land conservation and restoration for public benefit

Environment
2
Habitat for Humanity of Huron Valley

Habitat for humanity of huron valley exists to provide affordable housing to low-income individuals in the greater washtenaw county area.

Housing & Shelter
3
World Vision Inc

World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…

International
4
Westchester County Habitat for Humanity Inc

Westchester county habitat for humanity transforms lives and communities by building and preserving affordable homes with families in need, and by uniting all new yorkers around the cause of affordable housing.

Housing & Shelter
5
Our West Bayfront Inc

The mission of our west bayfront (owb) is to enhance the quality of life in the west bayfront neighborhoods by promoting civic involvement, thoughtful development, historical preservation, and neighborhood pride.

Community Improvement
6
German Village Society

The german village society strives to maintain the neighborhood's reputation as a recognized example of historic communities in columbus and across the country. the gvs goals are as follows: (1) gvs leads preservation efforts and…

Arts & Culture
7
West Virginia Ministry of Advocacy and Workcamps Inc

Host volunteer workgroups for home repairs

Housing & Shelter
8
Homefront Inc

To provide quality of life repairs at no cost to homeowners in need by combining skilled labor, quality materials and enthusiastic volunteers to bring about enduring changes.

Human Services
9
Vox United

Vox is an international non-profit organization working to positively transform the lives of children, families, and their communities. we specialize in bringing sustainable clean drinking water and humanitarian services to people in…

Human Services
10
West Virginia Community Action Partnersh

West virginia community action partnership is an alliance of community action agencies that supports and strengthens our members, advocates for low-income and families and promotes partnerships.

Community Improvement
11
Weathervane Community Playhouse

Weathervane's mission is to enrich quality of life and engage the community through theatre and education.

Arts & Culture
12
Neighborhood Center of West Volusia Inc

The neighborhood center of west volusia's mission is to be an integral port of the collaborative efforts to serve the homeless, to feed the hungry, and to prevent homelessness in the deland and west volusa county area.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Westcare Ohio Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kinder Korner Preschool Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VERSAILLES HERITAGE PARK FUND — $114,000 · OtherVERSAILLES HERITAGE PARK FUNDIndividual grant recipient — $65,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVERSAILLES COUNCIL OF CHURCHES INC — $25,000 · OtherVERSAILLES COUNCIL OF CHURCHES INCVERSAILLES SCHOOL DISTRICT — $23,500 · OtherVERSAILLES SCHOOL DISTRICTVERSAILLES SCHOOLS — $20,000 · OtherVERSAILLES SCHOOLSIndividual grant recipient — $15,000 · Other+10 more — $33,500 · Other+10 moreWE CHARITY WILLIAM C MORAN & ASSOC PC — $35,000 · InternationalWE CHARITY …INVISIBLE CHILDREN INC — $5,000 · InternationalINVISIBLE C…VERSAILLES MUSIC BOOSTERS — $19,205 · Education+1 more — $250 · EducationTOWNE & COUNTRY PLAYERS INC — $16,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOUSE OF BREAD — $15,000 · Food & NutritionTEAM RUBICON INC — $10,000 · Public Safety & DisasterMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC — $10,000 · Human Services
Other$296,000International$40,000Education$19,455Youth Development$16,000Food & Nutrition$15,000Public Safety & Disaster$10,000Human Services$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVERSAILLES HERITAGE PARK FUND — $114,000 over 2y, 44% of budgetWE CHARITY WILLIAM C MORAN & ASSOC PC — $35,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVERSAILLES MUSIC BOOSTERS — $19,205 over 6y, 14% of budgetHOUSE OF BREAD — $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Greater Dayton Inc — $7,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetROCK THE VOTE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINVISIBLE CHILDREN INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWESTCARE OHIO INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVERSAILLES AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetPEOPLE WORKING COOPERATIVELY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKINDER KORNER PRESCHOOL INC — $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dayton FoundationOH15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dayton Foundation · Lydia Schaurer Memorial Trust Fund · The CareSource Foundation · Dayton Foundation Plus Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bocholt Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bocholt Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bocholt Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph