Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bluestem Prairie Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$150k
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$83k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$236kArts & Culture$205kHealth$116kEducation$100kAnimals$38kRecreation & Sports$26kCivil Rights$24kFood & Nutrition$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k34 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $83k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Omaha Douglas Public Building Commi$83,340
Ollie Webb Center$10,000
Planned Parenthood$10,000
Film Streams$5,000
Foodbank For The Heartland$5,000
Omaha Public Library$5,000
Learning for All$4,000
Take Flight Farms$3,000
Joslyn Castle Trust$3,000
Nebraska Appleseed$2,500
Lauritzen Gardens$2,000
ACLU Foundation$2,000
Durham Museum$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Omaha Park Foundation$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Wounded Warriors: $1k → 12%Wounded Warriors: $1k → 12%Wounded Warriors: $1k → 12%Wounded Warriors: $1k → 12%Wounded Warriors: $1k → 12%Wounded Warriors: $1k → 12%Wounded Warriors: $1k → 12%Child Saving Institute: $500 → 12%Child Saving Institute: $500 → 12%Child Saving Institute: $500 → 12%Child Saving Institute: $500 → 12%Child Saving Institute: $500 → 12%Child Saving Institute: $500 → 12%Child Saving Institute: $500 → 12%Child Saving Institute: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$858k · 55 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

55 repeat relationships: 36 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
11

Total granted

$858k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+26%

Still filing today

53%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsHealthHuman ServicesReligionFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OW
    OLLIE WEBB CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +9%
  • JC
    JOSLYN CASTLE TRUST INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $39k · revenue +99%
  • LF
    LEARNING FOR ALL
    7× · 2019–2025 · $24k · revenue +100%

Funded once

  • HM
    HEART MINISTRY CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +26%
  • A
    ACLU
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • NH
    NE High School Track Scholarship
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nebraska Academy of Sciences
Science & Tech
2
Omaha Children's Museum

Omaha children's museum is a not-for-profit organization that provides children and families with opportunities to discover how the world works, challenge themselves, and learn through play. the mission of the museum is to engage the…

Arts & Culture
3
Opera Omaha Inc

Enriching the quality of life in the community by creating professional opera and music theater, which uniquely combine the visual and performing arts to express humanity's deepest emotions and highest aspirations.

Arts & Culture
4
One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
5
Museum of Nebraska Art

The museum of nebraska art (mona) celebrates the history of nebraska's visual art for diverse audiences. mona collects, preserves, researches, exhibits, and interprets the work of artists who were born, lived, trained, or worked in…

Arts & Culture
6
Omaha Botanical Center Inc

We believe in thoughtful, ecologically-minded practices and the curation of accessible, educational, and inspirational experiences that enhance lives.

Environment
7
Omaha Community Playhouse

The omaha community playhouse is a performing arts organization that enhances quality of life through live theatre, community involvement, and arts education. we are dedicated to enriching the lives of audiences and participants through…

Community Improvement
8
Omaha Zoological Society

The omaha zoological society's mission is to inspire, educate, and engage people to serve as life-long stewards for animals, their habitats, and their conservation.

Animals
9
Omaha Discovery Trust

The luminarium opened in april 2023 with more than 125 interactive exhibits and a kaleidoscope of engaging programs focused on science, art, and human perception. the luminarium is an innovative community space and learning environment…

Education
10
Omaha Performing Arts Society

The mission of Omaha Performing Arts is to enrich the community through presentation of the highest quality arts and entertainment experiences; education and community engagement programs; and stewardship of three world-class venues - the…

Arts & Culture
11
Hastings Museum

The mission of the hastings museum is to bring to life the natural and cultural history of hastings, adams county and the great plains of nebraska through the use of educational programs, exhibits and films.

—
12
Share Omaha

Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Omaha Public Schools Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Learning for All. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
22/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Omaha Douglas Public Building Commi: $236,130 · OtherOmaha Douglas Public Building CommiFILM STREAMS INC: $81,000 · OtherFILM STREAMS INCPlanned Parenthood: $59,000 · OtherPlanned ParenthoodOmaha Public Library: $59,000 · OtherOmaha Public LibraryTAKE FLIGHT FARMS INC: $27,000 · Other+44 more: $187,255 · Other+44 moreJOSLYN CASTLE TRUST INC: $39,100 · Arts & CultureJOSLYN CASTLE…Blue Barn Theatre: $17,500 · Arts & CultureBlue Barn The…THE DURHAM MUSEUM: $11,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DURHAM MU…American Museum of Natural History: $7,750 · Arts & CultureAmerican Muse…METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $7,000 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN …KANEKO: $6,500 · Arts & CultureKANEKOJOSLYN ART MUSEUM: $6,000 · Arts & CultureJOSLYN ART MU…THE UNION FOR CONTEMPORARY ART INC: $5,200 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $3,850 · Arts & CultureOLLIE WEBB CENTER INC: $50,000 · Health+1 more: $70 · HealthLEARNING FOR ALL: $24,000 · EducationGIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA: $17,100 · Youth DevelopmentNEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST: $15,000 · Crime & LegalWOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $4,000 · Human Services
Other$649,385Arts & Culture$103,900Health$50,070Education$24,000Youth Development$17,100Crime & Legal$15,000Human Services$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFILM STREAMS INC: $81,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetOLLIE WEBB CENTER INC: $50,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetJOSLYN CASTLE TRUST INC: $39,100 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetTAKE FLIGHT FARMS INC: $27,000 over 9y, 8.9% of budgetLEARNING FOR ALL: $24,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetBlue Barn Theatre: $17,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA: $17,100 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST: $15,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DURHAM MUSEUM: $11,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History: $7,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetKANEKO: $6,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $6,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJOSLYN ART MUSEUM: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOLLAND CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE: $6,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF OMAHA FOUNDATION INC: $5,600 over 7y, 9.9% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $5,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION FOR CONTEMPORARY ART INC: $5,200 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHEART MINISTRY CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOMAHA PARKS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNEBRASKA HUMANITIES COUNCIL: $5,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBIDEAWEE INC: $4,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOMAHA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE BIG GARDEN: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNAMI NEBRASKA: $1,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetNEBRASKA BRASS BAND INC: $650 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetOMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUDDY PAWS SECOND CHANCE RESCUE: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOLLAND CHILDRENS MOVEMENT: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLILY HAVEN: $70 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FILM STREAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds OLLIE WEBB CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds JOSLYN CASTLE TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds TAKE FLIGHT FARMS INC ↗
  • Who funds LEARNING FOR ALL ↗
  • Who funds Blue Barn Theatre ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST ↗
  • Who funds THE DURHAM MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds American Museum of Natural History ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds KANEKO ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds JOSLYN ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds HOLLAND CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF OMAHA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION FOR CONTEMPORARY ART INC ↗
  • Who funds HEART MINISTRY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA HUMANITIES COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds BIDEAWEE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sherwood FoundationNE43.7× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sherwood Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · The Holland Foundation · The Giving 3 Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · The Claire M Hubbard Foundation · Kenneth (Kim) & Karen Hawkins Foundation · Richard Brooke Foundation · The Hawks Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bluestem Prairie Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bluestem Prairie Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bluestem Prairie Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bluestem Prairie Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bluestem Prairie’s filings →

    More from the funding graph