Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bluestem Prairie Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$150k
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$83k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Housing & Shelter$236kArts & Culture$205kHealth$116kEducation$100kAnimals$38kRecreation & Sports$26kCivil Rights$24kFood & Nutrition$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k34 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $83k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Omaha Douglas Public Building Commi$83,340
Planned Parenthood$10,000
Ollie Webb Center$10,000
Film Streams$5,000
Omaha Public Library$5,000
Foodbank For The Heartland$5,000
Learning for All$4,000
Take Flight Farms$3,000
Joslyn Castle Trust$3,000
Nebraska Appleseed$2,500
ACLU Foundation$2,000
Lauritzen Gardens$2,000
The Nature Conservancy Nebraska$1,000
Wounded Warriors$1,000
Durham Museum$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Wounded Warriors: $1k → 12%Wounded Warriors: $1k → 12%Wounded Warriors: $1k → 12%Wounded Warriors: $1k → 12%Wounded Warriors: $1k → 12%Wounded Warriors: $1k → 12%Wounded Warriors: $1k → 12%Child Saving Institute: $500 → 12%Child Saving Institute: $500 → 12%Child Saving Institute: $500 → 12%Child Saving Institute: $500 → 12%Child Saving Institute: $500 → 12%Child Saving Institute: $500 → 12%Child Saving Institute: $500 → 12%Child Saving Institute: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$858k · 55 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

55 repeat relationships — 36 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
11

Total granted

$858k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+26%

Still filing today

53%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsHealthHuman ServicesReligionFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OW
    OLLIE WEBB CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +3%
  • JC
    JOSLYN CASTLE TRUST INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $39k · revenue +99%
  • LF
    LEARNING FOR ALL
    7× · 2019–2025 · $24k · revenue +100%

Funded once

  • HM
    HEART MINISTRY CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +26%
  • A
    ACLU
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • NH
    NE High School Track Scholarship
    one grant, 2019 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nebraska Academy of Sciences
Science & Tech
2
Omaha Children's Museum

Omaha children's museum is a not-for-profit organization that provides children and families with opportunities to discover how the world works, challenge themselves, and learn through play. the mission of the museum is to engage the…

Arts & Culture
3
Opera Omaha Inc

Enriching the quality of life in the community by creating professional opera and music theater, which uniquely combine the visual and performing arts to express humanity's deepest emotions and highest aspirations.

Arts & Culture
4
One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
5
Museum of Nebraska Art

The museum of nebraska art (mona) celebrates the history of nebraska's visual art for diverse audiences. mona collects, preserves, researches, exhibits, and interprets the work of artists who were born, lived, trained, or worked in…

Arts & Culture
6
Omaha Botanical Center Inc

We believe in thoughtful, ecologically-minded practices and the curation of accessible, educational, and inspirational experiences that enhance lives.

Environment
7
Omaha Community Playhouse

The omaha community playhouse is a performing arts organization that enhances quality of life through live theatre, community involvement, and arts education. we are dedicated to enriching the lives of audiences and participants through…

Community Improvement
8
Omaha Zoological Society

The omaha zoological society's mission is to inspire, educate, and engage people to serve as life-long stewards for animals, their habitats, and their conservation.

Animals
9
Omaha Discovery Trust

The luminarium opened in april 2023 with more than 125 interactive exhibits and a kaleidoscope of engaging programs focused on science, art, and human perception. the luminarium is an innovative community space and learning environment…

Education
10
Omaha Performing Arts Society

The mission of Omaha Performing Arts is to enrich the community through presentation of the highest quality arts and entertainment experiences; education and community engagement programs; and stewardship of three world-class venues - the…

Arts & Culture
11
Hastings Museum

The mission of the hastings museum is to bring to life the natural and cultural history of hastings, adams county and the great plains of nebraska through the use of educational programs, exhibits and films.

12
Share Omaha

Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Omaha Public Schools Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Learning for All. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%9%5–10yr21%24%10–20yr21%29%20–35yr14%27%35–55yr13%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%21%5–10yr21%5%10–20yr21%47%20–35yr14%20%35–55yr13%7%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/37
the rest of the field
11%
2,507/23,704

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
22/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Omaha Douglas Public Building Commi — $236,130 · OtherOmaha Douglas Public Building CommiFILM STREAMS INC — $81,000 · OtherFILM STREAMS INCOmaha Public Library — $59,000 · OtherOmaha Public LibraryPlanned Parenthood — $59,000 · OtherPlanned ParenthoodTAKE FLIGHT FARMS INC — $27,000 · Other+44 more — $187,255 · Other+44 moreJOSLYN CASTLE TRUST INC — $39,100 · Arts & CultureJOSLYN CASTLE…Blue Barn Theatre — $17,500 · Arts & CultureBlue Barn The…THE DURHAM MUSEUM — $11,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DURHAM MU…American Museum of Natural History — $7,750 · Arts & CultureAmerican Muse…METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $7,000 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN …KANEKO — $6,500 · Arts & CultureKANEKOJOSLYN ART MUSEUM — $6,000 · Arts & CultureJOSLYN ART MU…THE UNION FOR CONTEMPORARY ART INC — $5,200 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $3,850 · Arts & CultureOLLIE WEBB CENTER INC — $50,000 · Health+1 more — $70 · HealthLEARNING FOR ALL — $24,000 · EducationGIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA — $17,100 · Youth DevelopmentNEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST — $15,000 · Crime & LegalWOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC — $7,000 · Human ServicesCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC — $4,000 · Human Services
Other$649,385Arts & Culture$103,900Health$50,070Education$24,000Youth Development$17,100Crime & Legal$15,000Human Services$11,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFILM STREAMS INC — $81,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetOLLIE WEBB CENTER INC — $50,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetJOSLYN CASTLE TRUST INC — $39,100 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetTAKE FLIGHT FARMS INC — $27,000 over 9y, 8.9% of budgetLEARNING FOR ALL — $24,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetBlue Barn Theatre — $17,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA — $17,100 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST — $15,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DURHAM MUSEUM — $11,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND — $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History — $7,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC — $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetKANEKO — $6,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY — $6,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJOSLYN ART MUSEUM — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOLLAND CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE — $6,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF OMAHA FOUNDATION INC — $5,600 over 7y, 9.9% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $5,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION FOR CONTEMPORARY ART INC — $5,200 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA HUMANITIES COUNCIL — $5,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHEART MINISTRY CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOMAHA PARKS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBIDEAWEE INC — $4,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC — $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOMAHA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC — $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCATHEDRAL ARTS PROJECT INC — $2,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE BIG GARDEN — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNAMI NEBRASKA — $1,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetNEBRASKA BRASS BAND INC — $650 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetOMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUDDY PAWS SECOND CHANCE RESCUE — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOLLAND CHILDRENS MOVEMENT — $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLILY HAVEN — $70 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FILM STREAMS INC
  • Who funds OLLIE WEBB CENTER INC
  • Who funds JOSLYN CASTLE TRUST INC
  • Who funds TAKE FLIGHT FARMS INC
  • Who funds LEARNING FOR ALL
  • Who funds Blue Barn Theatre
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA
  • Who funds NEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST
  • Who funds THE DURHAM MUSEUM
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND
  • Who funds American Museum of Natural History
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
  • Who funds KANEKO
  • Who funds NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds JOSLYN ART MUSEUM
  • Who funds HOLLAND CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF OMAHA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds THE UNION FOR CONTEMPORARY ART INC
  • Who funds NEBRASKA HUMANITIES COUNCIL
  • Who funds HEART MINISTRY CENTER
  • Who funds OMAHA PARKS FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sherwood FoundationNE43.7× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sherwood Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · The Holland Foundation · The Giving 3 Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · The Claire M Hubbard Foundation · Kenneth (Kim) & Karen Hawkins Foundation · Richard Brooke Foundation · The Hawks Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bluestem Prairie Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bluestem Prairie Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bluestem Prairie Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph