Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Bluepearl Cares Inc

Bluepearl cares is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit charity providing grants and programs that impact the lives of pets needing specialty or emergency care, expanding to the most vulnerable in rural communities, veterinary deserts and urban centers.

$788k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $108,883 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $787,832 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $678,949 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $96k
$12,670
Median grant
9
States reached
$149k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHELTER FROM THE STORM ANIMAL RESCUE$15,000
ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION$15,000
UNDERDOG ANIMAL RESCUE AND REHAB$14,935
MOUNTAIN VIEW HUMANE$14,868
PET RESOURCE CENTER OF KANSAS CITY$12,670
HUMANE SOCIETY OF MEMPHIS AND SHELBY COUNTY$12,219
SPAY NEUTER NETWORK$10,967
PAWS CHICAGO$7,000
ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE$6,224
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 76% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE: $6k → 11%SPAY NEUTER NETWORK: $11k → 9%PET RESOURCE CENTER OF KANSAS CITY: $13k → 15%SHELTER FROM THE STORM ANIMAL RESCUE: $15k → 10%HUMANE SOCIETY OF MEMPHIS AND SHELBY COUNTY: $12k → 17%UNDERDOG ANIMAL RESCUE AND REHAB: $15k → 11%PAWS CHICAGO: $7k → 14%ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION: $15k → 12%MOUNTAIN VIEW HUMANE: $15k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
NJ
UT
MO
VA
AZ
TN
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
All About Animals Rescue

All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.

Animals
2
Save a Pet Animal Rescue Inc

Save-A-Pet Animal Rescue believes it is their moral responsibility to protect and improve the lives of abused, abandoned and homeless animals and to place them in loving, permanent homes. They provide spay and neuter services and any…

Animals
3
Animal Spay and Neuter a Nonprofit Clinic

To provide low cost pet spaying and neutering services, in an effort to reduce the number of pets that are euthanized.

Animals
4
Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals
5
Willamette Animal Guild

To reduce animal cruelty and suffering, with emphasis on providing low-cost spay/neuter and wellness services. Specifically, WAGs goal is to reduce pet overpopulation through our high-quality, high-volume, low-cost spay/neuter clinic in…

Animals
6
Spay Neuter Charlotte

The organization stands for every pet and pet owner by making the highest quality veterinary care and spay neuter services affordable and accessible, with the goal of reducing the number of dogs and cats euthanized in regional shelters and…

Animals
7
Wag Again Rescue

We opened up our clinic and through the low-cost wellness we provided, we kept approximately 14,600 dogs in their homes which means they werent in shelters, the streets, or being rehomed in 2024 and provided access to low-cost care to…

Animals
8
Animal Alliance Inc

Animal alliance places animals removed from the shelters into temporary foster care where they are rehabilitated, spayed/neutered, restored to health and readied for speedy adoption. through its planned pethood low cost spay/neuter clinic,…

Animals
9
Jet Wag Animal Rescue Inc

Our mission is to move adoptable dogs and cats primarily from heavily-burdened areas to loving homes. We work with trusted partners throughout the country and around the world and facilitate vet care, transport, and adoptions to help…

Animals
10
St Louis Metropolitan Spay Neuter and Wellness Center Inc

1.) provide low cost, subsidized or free spay/neuter surgeries for cats and dogs, including transportation services, 2.) provide wellness services for cats and dogs, and 3.) provide educational services regarding health and welfare of cats…

Animals
11
Safe Haven Inc
Animals
12
Spay-Neuter Assistance Program Inc

To prevent the suffering and death of companion animals and to enrich the human-animal bond by providing excellent, accessible, and affordable spay/neuter and veterinary care.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spay & Neuter Kansas City D/B/a Pet Resource Center of Kansas City and the most unlike its peers is Underdog Animal Rescue and Rehab. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
2/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Animal Welfare Association Inc — $15,000 · AnimalsAnimal Welfare Association IncUNDERDOG ANIMAL RESCUE AND REHAB — $14,935 · AnimalsUNDERDOG ANIMAL RESCUE AND REHABMOUNTAIN VIEW HUMANE — $14,868 · AnimalsMOUNTAIN VIEW HUMANESPAY & NEUTER KANSAS CITY D/B/A PET RESOURCE CENTER OF KANSAS CITY — $12,670 · AnimalsSPAY & NEUTER KANSAS CITY D/B/A PET RESOURCE CENTER OF KANSAS CITYHumane Society of Memphis & Shelby County — $12,219 · AnimalsHumane Society of Memphis & Shelby CountySPAY NEUTER NETWORK — $10,967 · AnimalsSPAY NEUTER NETWORKPAWS CHICAGO — $7,000 · AnimalsPAWS CHICAGOTHE ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE — $6,224 · AnimalsTHE ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUESHELTER FROM THE STORM ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $15,000 · OtherSHELTER FROM TH…
Animals$93,883Other$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSHELTER FROM THE STORM ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAnimal Welfare Association Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNDERDOG ANIMAL RESCUE AND REHAB — $14,935 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMOUNTAIN VIEW HUMANE — $14,868 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSPAY & NEUTER KANSAS CITY D/B/A PET RESOURCE CENTER OF KANSAS CITY — $12,670 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHumane Society of Memphis & Shelby County — $12,219 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSPAY NEUTER NETWORK — $10,967 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAWS CHICAGO — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE — $6,224 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Banfield FoundationWA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Banfield Foundation · Petco Love · Best Friends Animal Society · Petsmart Charities Inc · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bluepearl Cares Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bluepearl Cares Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Bluepearl Cares Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph