Skip to content

Minnesota · Public charity

BlueGreen Alliance Foundation

The BlueGreen Alliance Foundation (BGAF) conducts research and educates the public and media about solutions to environmental challenges that create economic opportunities for the American people. Pursuant to this mission and its interorganizational agreement with the BlueGreen Alliance (BGA), BGAF supports a variety of programs.

$102k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
1
Grants FY2025
4
Organizations funded FY2024
75%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$100,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$100,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 13
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$11M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 75% of the organizations BlueGreen Alliance Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 19% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentPublic BenefitEducationPhilanthropyAnimalsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving1$100k0%
FY20244$124k75%
FY20234$144k50%
FY20222$267k50%
FY20216$637k67%
FY202013$452k85%
FY20199$214k89%
FY20185$459k60%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$2.4MHealth$301kEmployment$24kEducation$16kPublic Benefit$15kScience & Tech$15kHousing & Shelter$12k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
RI
CA
UT
CO
VA
AZ
DC
OK
MS
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
BlueGreen Alliance Inc$2,000,000924%
Clean Production Action Inc$160,500212%
National Wildlife Federation$112,50020%
Workers Assistance Program Inc$97,00012%
Common Defense Civic Engagement Inc$66,66714%
Common Defense Education Fund Inc$66,66713%
Oregon Environmental Council$35,00011%
Arizona State University$34,0003n/a
City of Boulder$23,0001n/a
Municipality of Anchorage$20,0001n/a
Show all 34 grantees
All grantees of BlueGreen Alliance Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
BlueGreen Alliance Inc$2,000,000924%
Clean Production Action Inc$160,500212%
National Wildlife Federation$112,50020%
Workers Assistance Program Inc$97,00012%
Common Defense Civic Engagement Inc$66,66714%
Common Defense Education Fund Inc$66,66713%
Oregon Environmental Council$35,00011%
Arizona State University$34,0003n/a
City of Boulder$23,0001n/a
Municipality of Anchorage$20,0001n/a
City of Missoula$20,0001n/a
City of Flint$20,0001n/a
Providence School Department$16,5001n/a
The Trustees of Princeton University$15,00010%
One Voice$15,00011%
Boulder Housing Partners$12,0001n/a
Clean Water Fund$10,00010%
Charles Pankow Foundation$10,00010%
Southwest Detroit Environmental Vision$10,00011%
Lynn Public Schools$10,0001n/a
The Paideia Academies Inc$10,00010%
City of Champaign Township$10,0001n/a
Wisconsin Regional Training Partnership$8,00010%
Hire360$8,00010%
Michigan State AFL-CIO Workforce Dev Inst$8,0001n/a
Metropolitan State University Foundation$5,50010%
Redevelopment Agency$5,0001n/a
Healthy Start Inc$5,00010%
City of Scranton$5,0001n/a
Alaska Community Action on Toxics$5,00010%
City of Salem$5,0001n/a
City and County of San Francisco$5,0001n/a
Norman Animal Welfare$5,0001n/a
Greenfaith Inc$2,00010%

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget BlueGreen Alliance Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBlueGreen Alliance Inc: $2,000,000 over 9y, 24% of budgetClean Production Action Inc: $160,500 over 2y, 12% of budgetNational Wildlife Federation: $112,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWorkers Assistance Program Inc: $97,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCommon Defense Civic Engagement Inc: $66,667 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetCommon Defense Education Fund Inc: $66,667 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetOregon Environmental Council: $35,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOne Voice: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetClean Water Fund: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCharles Pankow Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSouthwest Detroit Environmental Vision: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe Paideia Academies Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWisconsin Regional Training Partnership: $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHire360: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMetropolitan State University Foundation: $5,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHealthy Start Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAlaska Community Action on Toxics: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGreenfaith Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 19.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Recreation and Park AssociationVA15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Recreation and Park Association · Natural Resources Defense Council Inc · Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation Inc · United States Energy Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Tides Foundation · Progressive Multiplier Fund · Cities for Financial Empowerment Fund Inc · National League of Cities Institute Inc · Windward Fund · Patagoniaorg · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare BlueGreen Alliance Foundation with peer funders

About BlueGreen Alliance Foundation

How much does BlueGreen Alliance Foundation give?
BlueGreen Alliance Foundation reported 1 grants totaling $102,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 13 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does BlueGreen Alliance Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (86%), Health (11%), Employment (1%).
Who are BlueGreen Alliance Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: BlueGreen Alliance Inc ($2.0M), Clean Production Action Inc ($161k), National Wildlife Federation ($113k).
Does BlueGreen Alliance Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 75% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as BlueGreen Alliance Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include National Recreation and Park Association, Natural Resources Defense Council Inc, Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation Inc.
Where is BlueGreen Alliance Foundation based?
BlueGreen Alliance Foundation is based in MN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on BlueGreen Alliance’s filings →

More from the funding graph