Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Blue Ridge Partnership for Children

Family education and development of children.

$252k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$58k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$276kHuman Services$195kPublic Safety & Disaster$116kHealth$114k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $171,616 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $252,169 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $80,553 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $93k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $58k
$10,003
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S CASTLE CHILDCARE CENTER$58,492
KINGDOM KIDS CHILDCARE CENTER$33,358
YANCEY HEAD START$20,273
SPRUCE PONE MONTESSORI$19,350
BUNCOMBE COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN$10,003
PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN OF THE FOOTHILLS$10,000
BURKE COUNTY SMART START$8,981
CHURCH STREET PRESCHOOL INC$5,950
AVERY COUNTY SCHOOLS$5,209
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 70% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%SMART START PARTNERSHIP: $10k → 12%MOUNTAIN AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC: $94k → 12%RESOURCES FOR RESILENCE: $37k → 12%SMART START OF TRANSYLVANIA: $10k → 13%KINGDOM KIDS CHILDCARE CENTER: $33k → 15%YANCEY HEAD START: $20k → 15%MADISON COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN: $9k → 15%TOE RIVER HEALTH DISTRICT: $74k → 16%CHILDREN'S CASTLE CHILDCARE CENTER: $58k → 16%PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN OF THE FOOTHILLS: $10k → 16%REGION A PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN: $12k → 18%MOUNTAIN AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC: $32k → 12%AVERY COUNTY COOPERATIVE EXTENSION: $6k → 15%CHURCH STREET PRESCHOOL INC: $11k → 15%TOE RIVER HEALTH DISTRICT: $55k → 16%PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN OF THE FOOTHILLS: $8k → 16%MOUNTAIN AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC: $19k → 12%AVERY COUNTY SCHOOLS: $5k → 15%YANCEY COUNTY COOPERATIVE EXTENSION: $9k → 15%TOE RIVER HEALTH DISTRICT: $53k → 16%BUNCOMBE COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 12%YANCEY COUNTY COOPERATIVE EXTENSION: $7k → 15%MITCHELL COUNTY COOPERATIVE EXTENSION: $9k → 16%CHURCH STREET PRESCHOOL INC: $7k → 15%MITCHELL COUNTY COOPERATIVE EXTENSION: $7k → 16%THE CHILDREN'S GARDEN INC: $7k → 15%TOE RIVER HEALTH DISTRICT: $5k → 16%CHURCH STREET PRESCHOOL INC: $6k → 15%SPRUCE PONE MONTESSORI: $19k → 16%CHURCH STREET PRESCHOOL INC: $6k → 15%CHURCH STREET PRESCHOOL INC: $6k → 15%CHURCH STREET PRESCHOOL INC: $6k → 15%YANCEY COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY: $6k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$431k · 6 repeat orgs$271k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$431k
$116k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
-1%

Still filing today

50%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $156k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    TOE RIVER HEALTH DISTRICT
    4× · 2020–2023 · $188k
  • MA
    MOUNTAIN AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $146k · revenue +34%
  • CS
    CHURCH STREET PRESCHOOL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $41k · revenue -39%

Funded once

  • RF
    Resources for Resilience
    one grant, 2024 · $37k · revenue 0%
  • AS
    APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • RA
    REGION A PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN
    one grant, 2024 · $12k · revenue -1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Carolina Partnership for Children Inc

The north carolina partnership for children (ncpc) is the lead organization and backbone of the smart start network, setting statewide vision, policy, and funding priorities. while local partnerships translate the statewide vision into…

Education
2
Partnership for Children of Cumberland County Inc

The partnership's mission is to be the driving force to engage partners to achieve lasting positive outcomes for all children, beginning at birth.

Education
3
Guilford County Partnership for Children Inc

The Guilford County Partnership for Children is a local non-profit strategically directing Smart Start and NC Pre-K funding to ensure equitable access to high quality childcare, professional development for early childhood educators and…

Education
4
Early Years Inc

Early years leads efforts to strengthen accessible and affordable quality early care and education by providing support for families, communities and the workforce. early years 's primary purpose is to provide services, research and…

5
Durham's Partnership for Children

To ensure every child in durham enters school ready to succeed, we lead community strategies for children birth to 5, and their families that promote healthy development and learning and echance access to high quality care.

Education
6
Surry County Early Childhood Partnership

For the future health and vitality of Surry County, the mission of the Surry County Early Childhood Partnership is to take action on behalf of the people of Surry County to support children 0 to 5 and their families through partnerships…

Education
7
Onslow County Partnership for Children

When they have challenges, we connect all children and their families to programs and resources that provide opportunities and hope.

Education
8
Partnership for Children of Johnston County Inc

The Partnership effectively utilizes a multitude of resources to ensure that Johnston's youngest residents and their families receive educational, health, and emotional support services, preparing children for lifelong success.

Education
9
Orange County Partnership for Young Children

To ensure that every child in orange county arrives at school healthy and ready to succeed. we focus on the early years of a child's life, from birth to five, which is the most critical time in a child's development.

Education
10
Down East Partnership for Children

Launch every child as a healthy, lifelong learner by the end of the third grade. This is accomplished through working across the four building blocks of early education. 1) Health and development are on track beginning before birth 2)…

Education
11
Martin Pitt Partnership for Children Inc

To make meaningful and measurable investments in the quality of life for young children and families in education, health, and support services.

Education
12
Montgomery County Partnership for Children Inc

To develop and implement strategies that will improve the education, health, and well-being of young children and their families in montgomery county, north carolina.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Burke County Smart Start Inc and the most unlike its peers is Spruce Pine Montessori School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
3/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TOE RIVER HEALTH DISTRICT — $187,813 · OtherTOE RIVER HEALTH DISTRICTCHILDREN'S CASTLE CHILDCARE CENTER — $58,492 · OtherCHILDREN'S CASTLE CHILDCARE CENTERCHURCH STREET PRESCHOOL INC — $41,128 · OtherCHURCH STREET PRESCHOOL INCKINGDOM KIDS CHILDCARE CENTER — $33,358 · OtherKINGDOM KIDS CHILDCARE CENTERAPPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY — $24,851 · OtherAPPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITYEast Yancey Water and Sewer District — $21,900 · OtherSPRUCE PINE MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC — $19,350 · OtherCOUNTY OF MITCHELL — $16,400 · Other+3 more — $17,621 · OtherMOUNTAIN AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC — $145,763 · EducationMOUNTAIN AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INCResources for Resilience — $37,345 · EducationResources for ResilienceINTERMOUNTAIN CHILDRENS SERVICES — $20,273 · EducationINTERMOUNTAIN CHILDRENS SERVICESPARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN OF THE FOOTHILLS INC — $17,603 · EducationPARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN OF THE FOOTHILLS INCREGION A PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN — $12,000 · EducationBLUE RIDGE PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN — $10,003 · EducationSMART START PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDRE — $10,000 · EducationSMART START OF TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY — $10,000 · Education+2 more — $18,051 · Education+2 more
Other$420,913Education$281,038

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMOUNTAIN AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC — $145,763 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHURCH STREET PRESCHOOL INC — $41,128 over 6y, 9.8% of budgetResources for Resilience — $37,345 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetINTERMOUNTAIN CHILDRENS SERVICES — $20,273 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSPRUCE PINE MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC — $19,350 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN OF THE FOOTHILLS INC — $17,603 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetREGION A PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN — $12,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBLUE RIDGE PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN — $10,003 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSMART START PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDRE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSMART START OF TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMADISON COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC — $9,070 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetBURKE COUNTY SMART START INC — $8,981 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dogwood Health TrustNC29.9× affinity12 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dogwood Health Trust · The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · North Carolina Partnership for Children Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Blue Ridge Partnership for Children funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph