Loading…
· Public charity
BLOCKCHAIN CHARITY FOUNDATION USA
Transparency and accountability in charitable giving.
$3.8M
Granted FY2021
3
Grants
3
Communities
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fund
01beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
covid relief
2021
crypto currencyfinancialrelief
2022
—
2023
—
2024
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
02FY2021 · 3 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2021
- $10k–50k1 grant · $31k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.1M
$60,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
- UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY$1,111,059
- CODE TO INSPIRE$60,000
- ONE TREE PLANTED$31,129
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 11%. 5% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Montefiore Health System Inc
To heal, to teach, to discover and to advance the health of the communities we serve.
Health
2
Long Island Jewish Medical Center
LIJMC strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality of care for the community regardless of ability to pay.
Health
3
Nyu Langone Hospitals
Nyu langone hospitals' trifold mission to serve, teach, and discover is achieved daily through an integrated academic culture devoted to excellence in patient care, education, and research.
Health
4
Northwell Health Inc
Northwell Health is the parent company of a fully integrated health system that is committed to caring for the community regardless of ability to pay.
Community Improvement
5
South Shore University Hospital
South Shore strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care and caring for the entire community.
Health
6
The New York and Presbyterian Hospital
To be a leader in the provision of world class patient care, teaching, research, and service to local, state, national, and international communities.
Health
7
Staten Island University Hospital Foundation
The mission of siuh foundation is to achieve philanthropic relationships for support and endowment, pro- viding the highest quality care, services and state-of-the-art equip.
Health
8
The Mount Sinai Hospital
Mount sinai provides compassionate patient care and advanced medicine through education, research and outreach in the many diverse communities it serves.
Health
9
Northern Westchester Hospital Association
Nwh strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality of care for the community regardless of ability to pay.
Health
10
Central Suffolk Hospital
Central suffolk hospital ("csh") is a not-for-profit hospital, a skilled nursing facility, and a certified home care agency.
Health
11
Lenox Hill Hospital Medical Pc
Lenox Hill Hospital Medical, PC strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care.
Health
12
Plainview Hospital
health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality of care for the community regardless of ability to pay
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Beth Israel Medical Center and the most unlike its peers is Maimonides Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Education$1,111,059International$60,000Philanthropy$31,129
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Reach Out and Read of Greater New YorkNY16× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Reach Out and Read of Greater New York · Caipa Foundation Inc · New York Metropolitan Reference And · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation BLOCKCHAIN CHARITY FOUNDATION USA funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CODE TO INSPIRE.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~5 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 9 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
9 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.9× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 473076235 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on CODE TO INSPIRE, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 5 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 12% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Blockchain Charity Foundation USA?
Find your warmest path to Blockchain Charity Foundation USA through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines