Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bleser Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
42
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$225k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$4.5MHealth$2.6MReligion$616kHousing & Shelter$406kHuman Services$400kFood & Nutrition$397kYouth Development$289kRecreation & Sports$255kOther$0
02FY2024 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $447k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $1.3M
$15,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$36M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY$225,000
SNC SCHOLARSHIP FUND$225,000
MAYO CLINIC FUND$200,000
CRAIG HOSPITAL$200,000
SACRED HEART SCHOOL$120,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$100,000
WAISMAN CENTER - UW MADISON$100,000
SAFE HAVEN$60,000
NORTHEAST WISCONSIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE$50,000
SACRED HEART PARISH$47,000
FRIENDS OF SHAWANO COUNTY LIBRARY$35,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
SHAWANO AREA FOOD PANTRY AND RESOURCE CENTER$30,000
SAM25$30,000
DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SAM25: $30k → 11%SAM25: $20k → 11%SAM25: $20k → 11%SAM25: $20k → 11%SAM25: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.7M · 50 repeat orgs$731k to everyone else

50 repeat relationships: 40 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
18

Total granted

$9.7M
$696k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+60%

Still filing today

38%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentFood & NutritionEducationHealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    Marquette University
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +24%
  • CH
    Craig Hospital
    5× · 2020–2024 · $675k · revenue +48%
  • DA
    DOMESTIC ABUSE SUPPORT CENTER OF SHAWANO COUNTY INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $310k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • SS
    SNS SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $250k
  • HS
    HSHS ST VINCENT FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $150k
  • SM
    SHAWANO MEDICAL CENTER FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wisconsin Wildlife Federation Inc

The wisconsin wildlife federation has a dual mission to engage in conservation education and to advocate for sound conservation policy.

Environment
2
Food Pantry of Waukesha County Inc

The food pantry serving waukesha county provides food, hope, and dignity to county residents in need, and advocates to increase awareness of hunger through community partnerships.

—
3
Waushara County Food Pantry Inc

We provide food, household and personal items as available to combat food scarcity and poverty in our community.

Food & Nutrition
4
Waukesha County Historical Society & Museum Inc

The museum is an educational institution dedicated to preserving the history and culture of waukesha county.

—
5
Friends of Wisconsin State Parks Inc

To preserve, promote, protect, and enhance wisconsin state parks, forests, trails, and recreation areas.

Recreation & Sports
6
Waukesha County Land Conservancy Inc

To protect environmentally senstive land in waukesha county wisconsin

Environment
7
Friends of Kishwauketoe

To further improve and maintain the kishwauketoe nature conservancy.

Environment
8
Wisconsin Humane Society

The mission of the Wisconsin Humane Society is to make a difference for animals and the people who love them.

Animals
9
Humane Animal Welfare Society of Waukesha County Inc

The humane animal welfare society of waukesha county leads the community in animal welfare and assures sanctuary for animals in need.

Animals
10
Wisconsin Agricultural Education Center Inc

To educate visitors of all ages about how and where their food is produced and why agriculture is so important to them.

Arts & Culture
11
Southeast Wisconsin Land Conservancy

Obtain and manage land of ecological significance.

Environment
12
University of Wisconsin - River Falls Foundation Inc

An independent, not for profit wisconsin corporation, the uwrf foundation is organized solely for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-river falls. private giving to the foundation is essential in raising the level of excellence at…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Wisconsin Inc; the most unlike its peers is Domestic Abuse Support Center of Shawano County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
17/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $800,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITALSACRED HEART SCHOOL: $751,500 · OtherSACRED HEART SCHOOLMAYO CLINIC FUND: $750,000 · OtherMAYO CLINIC FUNDSNC SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $725,000 · OtherSNC SCHOLARSHIP FUNDST NORBERT COLLEGE SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $500,000 · OtherST NORBERT COLLEGE SCHOLARSHIP FUNDWAISMAN CENTER - UW MADISON: $500,000 · OtherWAISMAN CENTER - UW MADISONIndividual grant recipient: $400,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSACRED HEART PARISH: $349,000 · OtherSNS SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $250,000 · Other+46 more: $2,210,517 · Other+46 moreMarquette University: $1,195,000 · EducationMarquette Unive…UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $225,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF W…Craig Hospital: $675,000 · Health+1 more: $21,000 · HealthDOMESTIC ABUSE SUPPORT CENTER OF SHAWANO COUNTY INC: $310,000 · Housing & ShelterWOLF RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $28,000 · Housing & ShelterSHAWANO AREA FOOD PANTRY AND RESOURCES CENTER INC: $126,000 · Food & NutritionPAUL'S PANTRY INC: $125,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC: $50,000 · Food & NutritionNAVARINO NATURE CENTER INC: $100,000 · EnvironmentGREEN BAY BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $90,000 · EnvironmentTREES FOR TOMORROW INC: $15,000 · EnvironmentWOODLAND DUNES NATURE CENTER AND PRESERVE INC: $12,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF SHAWANO COUNTY LIBRARIES INC: $175,000 · Arts & CultureShawano County Arts Council Inc: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$7,236,017Education$1,420,000Health$696,000Housing & Shelter$338,000Food & Nutrition$301,000Environment$217,000Arts & Culture$185,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMarquette University: $1,195,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCraig Hospital: $675,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDOMESTIC ABUSE SUPPORT CENTER OF SHAWANO COUNTY INC: $310,000 over 6y, 7.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $225,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF SHAWANO COUNTY LIBRARIES INC: $175,000 over 5y, 58% of budgetSHAWANO AREA FOOD PANTRY AND RESOURCES CENTER INC: $126,000 over 4y, 31% of budgetPAUL'S PANTRY INC: $125,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSHAWANO COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $120,000 over 6y, 7.8% of budgetSHAWANO AREA MATTHEW 25 INC: $117,500 over 6y, 9.5% of budgetNAVARINO NATURE CENTER INC: $100,000 over 5y, 20% of budgetGREEN BAY BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $90,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetRAWHIDE INC: $90,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWOLF RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $28,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC: $21,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTREES FOR TOMORROW INC: $15,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetWOODLAND DUNES NATURE CENTER AND PRESERVE INC: $12,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetShawano County Arts Council Inc: $10,000 over 5y, 9.8% of budgetFORREST GOETSCH CHARITIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 81% of budgetBADGER BOYS STATE INCORPORATED: $4,800 over 4y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds Craig Hospital ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC ABUSE SUPPORT CENTER OF SHAWANO COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF SHAWANO COUNTY LIBRARIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SHAWANO AREA FOOD PANTRY AND RESOURCES CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PAUL'S PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds SHAWANO COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SHAWANO AREA MATTHEW 25 INC ↗
  • Who funds NAVARINO NATURE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GREEN BAY BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds RAWHIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Little Rapids Corporation - Egan Family Foundation IncWI26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Little Rapids Corporation - Egan Family Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Ruth & Pat Crawford Family Foundation Inc · K C Stock Foundation Inc · Cornerstone Foundation of Northeastern Wisconsin Inc · Covantage Cares Foundation Inc · George Kress Foundation Inc · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Baird Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bleser Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bleser Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bleser Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph