Skip to content
Blaser Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Blaser Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$269k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$225k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$473kEducation$83kPhilanthropy$76kReligion$40kYouth Development$31kFood & Nutrition$13kInternational$11kCommunity Improvement$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $225k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$31k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE LYRICS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION$225,000
JAR OF HOPE$20,000
PACE CENTER FOR GIRLS$10,000
ALACHUA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$8,000
CHRIST COMMUNITY CHURCH$5,000
UF CAMPAIGN FOR CHARITIES$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY: $500 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
NJ
CT
CA
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Blaser Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 77% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 64%.

Blaser Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$543k · 13 repeat orgs$203k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
21

Total granted

$543k
$169k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+36%

Still filing today

38%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentEducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC
    5× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +67%
  • GO
    GIRLS ON THE RUN NYC INC
    2× · 2017–2024 · $1k · revenue +142%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $610 · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • TL
    THE LYICS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $75k
  • SF
    SANTA FE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +36%
  • TU
    TRINITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
2
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
3
H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Hospital Inc

The primary purpose of the h. lee moffitt cancer center and research institute hospital, inc. ("hospital") is to contribute to the prevention and cure of cancer.

Health
4
The Children's Cancer Cause Inc

The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.

Health
5
Global Down Syndrome Foundation

To significantly improve the lives of people with down syndrome through research, medical care, education and advocacy. an important part of this mission is to support the global affiliate organizations that we helped establish and…

Health
6
Cog Research Foundation Llc

Cog research foundation, llc is a california 501(c)(3) entity founded in 2024 and designed to become the federal grantee organization for the children's oncology group (cog). the cog, a member of the national cancer institute (nci)…

Health
7
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
8
Alliance for Childhood Diseases

To advance cures and treatment of childhood cancer and other rare diseases.

Health
9
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
10
The Jackson Laboratory

The purposes of the laboratory are scientific, medical, charitable, and educational. our mission is to discover precise genomic solutions for disease and empower the biomedical community.

Health
11
Florida Chamber of Commerce Foundation Inc

Working in partnership with state business leaders to secure florida's future.

—
12
Cadasil Association

The mission of curecadasil is to raise awareness of cadasil, ensuring it will be universally recognized and understood by the medical community, enabling patients to be correctly diagnosed. we are dedicated to helping all touched by…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pace Center for Girlsinc; the most unlike its peers is Chamber of Commerce. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/17
Grantees still filing
8/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $96,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE LYICS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $75,000 · OtherTHE LYICS FOR LIFE FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $50,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSANTA FE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · OtherSANTA FE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCTRINITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherTRINITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCHSEBASTIAN FERRERO FOUNDATION INC: $18,372 · OtherTASTE OF GREATER GAINESVILLE INC: $12,255 · Other+21 more: $45,381 · Other+21 moreLYRICS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION INC: $325,000 · PhilanthropyLYRICS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION INCPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC: $30,200 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS ON THE RUN NYC INC: $1,250 · Youth DevelopmentJAR OF HOPE: $20,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $4,825 · HealthTYLER'S HOPE FOR DYSTONIA CURE INC: $1,000 · Health+1 more: $610 · HealthChamber of Commerce: $8,000 · Community ImprovementTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEORG: $236 · EducationCADE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$347,508Philanthropy$325,000Youth Development$31,450Health$26,435Community Improvement$8,000Education$5,236Arts & Culture$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLYRICS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION INC: $325,000 over 2y, 41% of budgetPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC: $30,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJAR OF HOPE: $20,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTASTE OF GREATER GAINESVILLE INC: $12,255 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetChamber of Commerce: $8,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $4,825 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCADE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN NYC INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTYLER'S HOPE FOR DYSTONIA CURE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $610 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChild Advocacy Center Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $236 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LYRICS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JAR OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds SEBASTIAN FERRERO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TASTE OF GREATER GAINESVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds Chamber of Commerce ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CADE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN NYC INC ↗
  • Who funds TYLER'S HOPE FOR DYSTONIA CURE INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗
  • Who funds Child Advocacy Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation of North Central FloridaFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Central Florida · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Blaser Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Blaser Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Child Advocacy Center Inc: 40% of income from government
  • The Children's Home Society of Florida: 6% of income from government
  • Pace Center for Girlsinc: 2% of income from government
  • Cade Museum Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Santa Fe College Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Blaser Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home